Effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination in healthcare workers: A systematic review

Infectious Disease Control Training Centre, Hospital Authority/Infection Control Branch, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR, China.
The Journal of hospital infection (Impact Factor: 2.54). 12/2011; 79(4):279-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.08.004
Source: PubMed


Vaccination is considered a key measure to protect vulnerable groups against influenza infection. The objectives of this review are to determine the effect of influenza vaccinations in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza infections, influenza-like illnesses (ILIs), working days lost among vaccinated HCWs, and associated adverse effects after vaccination. Twenty-two healthcare-related databases and internet resources, as well as reference lists, and the bibliographies of all of the retrieved articles were examined. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of any kind of influenza vaccine among all groups of HCWs with a placebo/vaccine other than the influenza vaccine/no intervention were included in the review. Only three RCTs matched the inclusion criteria. There is a limited amount of evidence suggesting that receiving influenza vaccination reduces laboratory-confirmed influenza infections in HCWs. No evidence can be found of influenza vaccinations significantly reducing the incidence of influenza, number of ILI episodes, days with ILI symptoms, or amount of sick leave taken among vaccinated HCWs. There is insufficient data to assess the adverse effects after vaccination. There is no definitive conclusion on the effectiveness of influenza vaccinations in HCWs because of the limited number of related trials. Further research is necessary to evaluate whether annual vaccination is a key measure to protect HCWs against influenza infection and thus increase their confidence in the vaccine. In the mean time, the direction of promoting influenza vaccination to HCWs can be shifted from staff protection to patient protection, with accurate information to address concerns and misconceptions.

32 Reads
  • Source
    • "Programs intended to increase influenza vaccination uptake among healthcare workers reported 5%–45% increase in uptake with best case cost saving of £12/vaccine [44]. Accurate information dissemination and addressing concerns and misconceptions was identified as the key components to increase the acceptance and uptake of influenza vaccinations [46]. Pharmacist-led interventions aimed to reduce drug-related morbidity, hospitalization or death from medication overuse or misuse in healthcare facility have shown significant impact on reducing hospital admissions (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.96) although the evidence is weak and does not report impact on preventable drug related morbidity [49]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most of the maternal and newborn deaths occur at birth or within 24 hours of birth. Therefore, essential lifesaving interventions need to be delivered at basic or comprehensive emergency obstetric care facilities. Facilities provide complex interventions including advice on referrals, post discharge care, long-term management of chronic conditions along with staff training, managerial and administrative support to other facilities. This paper reviews the effectiveness of facility level inputs for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. We considered all available systematic reviews published before May 2013 on the pre-defined facility level interventions and included 32 systematic reviews. Findings suggest that additional social support during pregnancy and labour significantly decreased the risk of antenatal hospital admission, intrapartum analgesia, dissatisfaction, labour duration, cesarean delivery and instrumental vaginal birth. However, it did not have any impact on pregnancy outcomes. Continued midwifery care from early pregnancy to postpartum period was associated with reduced medical procedures during labour and shorter length of stay. Facility based stress training and management interventions to maintain well performing and motivated workforce, significantly reduced job stress and improved job satisfaction while the interventions tailored to address identified barriers to change improved the desired practice. We found limited and inconclusive evidence for the impacts of physical environment, exit interviews and organizational culture modifications. At the facility level, specialized midwifery teams and social support during pregnancy and labour have demonstrated conclusive benefits in improving maternal newborn health outcomes. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited to high income countries. Future programs in resource limited settings should utilize these findings to implement relevant interventions tailored to their needs.
    Reproductive Health 09/2014; 11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S4. DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S4 · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Influenzainfektionen können sich in Krankenhäusern schnell ausbreiten, nosokomiale Influenzaübertragungen sind wiederholt beschrieben worden. Die Influenzaimpfung des medizinischen Personals ist eine wichtige Maßnahme, um sowohl Mitarbeiter als auch Patienten zu schützen. Im Sommer 2011 fand eine anonyme Befragung in hessischen Krankenhäusern über die Influenzaimpfquoten sowie die Art und Durchführung der klinikinternen Impfprogramme statt. Insgesamt 95,8% (68/71) der befragten Krankenhäuser bieten kostenlose Influenzaimpfungen für das medizinische Personal an. Die Influenzaimpfquoten werden jedoch nur von 70,4% (50/71) der Krankenhäuser erfasst. Über 80% (Saison 2009/2010: 41/50; Saison 2010/2011: 44/50) der befragten Krankenhäuser gaben Influenzaimpfquoten der medizinischen Beschäftigten von weniger als 20% an. Die von uns erhobenen Daten zeigen, dass die Influenzaimpfquoten in Krankenhäusern vermutlich noch geringer sind als bisher angenommen und dass hier die üblicherweise in Deutschland kommunizierten Impfquoten von 20–25% nicht erreicht werden. Dreißig Jahre, nachdem die Ständige Impfkommission (STIKO) die Influenzaimpfung für medizinische Beschäftigte empfiehlt, liegen die Impfquoten bei ihnen weiterhin unter 30%. Maßnahmen zur Steigerung der Influenzaimpfquoten sind somit erforderlich. Eine Erfassung der Impfquoten ist Voraussetzung, um die Akzeptanz eines Impfkonzeptes zu bewerten.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 08/2012; 55(8). DOI:10.1007/s00103-012-1510-7 · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Influenza infections have been shown to spread in hospitals rapidly; nosocomial transmissions occur frequently. Influenza vaccination of health care personnel (HCP) is an effective strategy for preventing influenza infections among personnel and patients. In summer 2011 we conducted an anonymous questionnaire among Hessian hospitals assessing influenza vaccination rates, kind and concept of vaccination programmes. Overall, 95.8% (68/71) of hospitals surveyed offered influenza vaccinations for HCP free of charge. Influenza vaccination rates have been recorded only by 70.4% (50/71). Over 80% (season 2009/2010: 41/50- season 2010/2011: 44/50) of hospitals questioned, mentioned influenza vaccination rates under 20%. Our findings confirm that the influenza vaccination rates might be less than the generally assumed and communicated influenza vaccination rates of 20-25%. Thirty years since the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) recommended that all HCP get vaccinated against influenza, vaccination rates still remain below 30%. Measures to improve influenza vaccination rates among HCP are required. Monitoring of vaccination rates is a precondition to assess the acceptance of a vaccination programme.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 08/2012; 55(8):932-6. · 1.42 Impact Factor
Show more


32 Reads
Available from