Article

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction between AEE788 and RAD001 causing thrombocytopenia in patients with glioblastoma.

Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, SW-460F, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (Impact Factor: 2.8). 01/2012; 69(1):281-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1754-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Treating glioblastoma through the simultaneous inhibition of multiple transduction pathways may prove more effective than single-pathway inhibition. We evaluated the safety, biologic activity, and pharmacokinetic profile of oral AEE788, a selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), plus oral RAD001, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, in glioblastoma patients.
This phase IB/II, open-label, multicenter, 2-arm, dose-escalation study enrolled adult glioblastoma patients at first or second recurrence/relapse. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of AEE788 combined with RAD001. Secondary objectives included determining the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of the combination.
Sixteen patients were enrolled (AEE788 200 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg/day, 2 patients; AEE788 150 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg every other day [qod], 14); all patients discontinued the study most commonly because of disease progression. Four patients experienced DLT (AEE788 200 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg/day, 1 patient; AEE788 150 mg/day + RAD001 5 mg qod, 3). Both patients receiving AEE788 (200 mg/day) plus RAD001 (5 mg/day) experienced clinically significant thrombocytopenia requiring a dose reduction/interruption. AEE788 appeared to inhibit the metabolism of RAD001. The study was terminated prematurely before an MTD was determined because of safety findings in other studies evaluating AEE788 monotherapy.
The coadministration of AEE788 and RAD001 in glioblastoma patients caused a clinically significant thrombocytopenia and a higher-than-expected RAD001 area under the curve concentration when dosed at 200 and 5 mg/day, respectively. After a dose reduction to AEE788 (150 mg/day) and RAD001 (5 mg qod), the combination appeared to be better tolerated.

1 Bookmark
 · 
85 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although chemotherapy has advanced into the era of targeted drugs, the antitumor efficacies of current therapies are limited, most likely because of the high degree of cancer clonal heterogeneity, intratumor genetic heterogeneity, and cell signal complexity. Since shutdown of a single target does not necessarily eradicate the cancer, the use of combinations of molecular targeted agents has been proposed, and some pioneering research has been conducted to examine the efficacy of this strategy. Here, we summarize the clinical and preclinical studies that are underway in an attempt to improve the anticancer efficacy of chemotherapies through combination strategies. Studies of combining cytotoxic agents with molecular targeted agents, co-inhibiting two or more targets in a single pathway, or co-inhibiting parallel or compensatory pathways as well as specific combinations will be introduced respectively, and the antitumor potentials of each combination strategy will be evaluated. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    International Journal of Cancer 05/2013; · 6.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to achieve higher dosages than previously used in clinical trials, we conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of erlotinib and sirolimus for the treatments of recurrent malignant gliomas. Patients with pathologically proven World Health Organization (WHO) grade III glioma and grade IV glioblastoma and radiographically proven tumor recurrence were eligible for this study. Treatments included once daily erlotinib, which was given alone for the first 7 days of treatments, then in combination with once daily sirolimus. Sirolimus was given with a loading dose on day 8 followed by a maintenance dose starting on day 9. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined over the first 28 days of treatments, and the MTD was determined in a 3 + 3 classic study design. 19 patients were enrolled, and 13 patients were eligible for MTD determination. The MTD was determined to be 150 mg daily for erlotinib and 5 mg daily (after a 15 mg loading dose) for sirolimus. The DLTs included rash and mucositis (despite maximal medical managements), hypophosphatemia, altered mental status, and neutropenia. The combination of erlotinib and sirolimus is difficult to tolerate at dosages higher than previously reported in phase II trials.
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology 08/2012; 110(2):245-50. · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Despite therapy with maximal safe surgical resection, radiation and temozolomide, prognosis remains poor at 14.6 months. Hence, there is an urgent need for developing novel therapeutic agents. In GBMs, the balance of angiogenic growth factors is skewed toward pro-angiogenesis and VEGF is identified as the key growth factor responsible for neovasculature. Targeting angiogenesis is hypothesized to arrest tumor growth and hence VEGF is an attractive therapeutic target. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to discuss VEGF pathway inhibitors, their efficacy as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, the effects on the radiographic response/assessment for GBMs, mechanisms of resistance and associated biomarkers. A short summary of angiogenesis and of the biological characteristics of angiogenesis will also be provided to enhance the understanding of VEGF pathway inhibitors. Expert opinion: Therapeutic targeting of VEGF has lead to improvements in progression-free survival in GBM patients without any change in the overall survival. VEGF-targeted therapy remains a promising therapeutic opportunity if improvements in biomarkers, imaging techniques and rational combination therapy are used to help advance the clinical efficacy of this approach.
    Expert opinion on therapeutic targets 08/2012; 16(10):973-84. · 3.72 Impact Factor