Alignment of Ankle and Hindfoot in Early Stage Ankle Osteoarthritis

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University, 85, 2-Ka, Jur-dong, Chung-ku, Seoul 100-032, Republic of Korea.
Foot & Ankle International (Impact Factor: 1.51). 07/2011; 32(7):693-9. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0693
Source: PubMed


Supramlleolar osteotomy has been recommended to correct varus deformity of the tibial plafond, however we have seen only a few ankles with significant deviation of alignment in early stage osteoarthritis, in which realignment treatments might be necessary to modify the course of the disease. Our hypothesis was that there are diverse radiographic features of the tibial plafond and hindfoot in varus ankle osteoarthritis.
The study included 154 ankles of 98 patients with medial osteoarthritis, and 80 ankles of 80 normal subjects. On weightbearing AP radiographs, the tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), tibial axis-medial malleolus angle (TMM) and talar tilt angle was measured. On weightbearing lateral radiographs, tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) was measured. On the hindfoot alignment view, the heel alignment angle and heel alignment ratio were obtained. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were obtained for all radiographic parameters. The radiographic parameters were compared among the normal ankles and the ankles in different stages of ankle arthritis by the Takakura classification.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability were very high for all radiographic parameters except TLS. There was no statistically significant difference in TAS among stages 2, 3a, and 3b. TAS was 86.9 +/- 2.4 degrees, 86.2 +/- 3.3 degrees, and 85.4 +/- 4 3.1 degrees in stage 2, 3a, 3b, respectively. There was no significant difference in hindfoot alignment among normal, stage 2, stage 3a. The hindfoot alignment angle was 0.5 +/- 8.1 degrees, 0.5 +/- 6.8 degrees, and 9.6 +/- 9.1 degrees in Stage 2, 3a, 3b, respectively.
Alignment of the tibial plafond and hindfoot was variable in early stage ankle osteoarthritis. Level of Evidence: III, Retrospective Case Control Study

11 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We recommend gradual correction of distal tibia varus as most applicable for patients with severe deformities that would not be adequately corrected with acute methods. Complex deformity, compromised soft tissues, and limb shortening are, in general, better managed with this technique.
    Foot and ankle clinics 03/2012; 17(1):83-93. DOI:10.1016/j.fcl.2011.11.002 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Varus malalignment of the ankle may be a misleading term. The isolated frontal plane deformity has been shown to be multiplanar in nature. Identifying this dominant feature of the condition and applying appropriate surgical principles to allow for complete correction of the deformity are critical to a successful outcome. The following 3 factors are key to an optimal surgical outcome from TAR with VMAA: (1) Obtaining a congruent ankle with sufficient ROM is a important before implantation of the arthroplasty prosthesis; (2) not all ankles are correctable; and (3) recognition both preoperatively and intraoperatively that a conversion of TAR to a fusion is sometimes the best course of action to achieve best results or patient satisfaction.
    Foot and ankle clinics 03/2012; 17(1):127-39. DOI:10.1016/j.fcl.2011.11.008 · 0.76 Impact Factor
  • Foot & Ankle International 05/2012; 33(5):450-4. DOI:10.3113/FAI.2012.0450 · 1.51 Impact Factor
Show more