Low-Quality, High-Cost Hospitals, Mainly In South, Care For Sharply Higher Shares Of Elderly Black, Hispanic, And Medicaid Patients

Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 10/2011; 30(10):1904-11. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As policy makers design national programs aimed at managing the quality and costs of health care, it is important to understand the potential impact on minority and poor patients and the hospitals that provide most of their care. We analyzed a range of hospital data and assigned hospitals to various categories, including "best"-high-quality, low-cost institutions-and "worst"-where quality is low and costs high. We found that the "worst" hospitals-typically small public or for-profit institutions in the South-care for double the proportion (15 percent versus 7 percent) of elderly black patients as the "best" hospitals-typically nonprofit institutions in the Northeast. Similarly, elderly Hispanic and Medicaid patients accounted for 1 percent and 15 percent, respectively, of the patient population at the best hospitals, while at the worst hospitals, these groups represented 4 percent and 23 percent of the patients. Patients with acute myocardial infarction at the worst hospitals had 7-10 percent higher odds of death compared to patients with those conditions admitted to the best hospitals. Our findings have important implications for Medicare's forthcoming value-based purchasing program. The worst institutions in particular will have to improve on both costs and quality to avoid incurring financial penalties and exacerbating disparities in care.

Download full-text


Available from: Ashish K Jha, Jul 04, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health disparities, which are sometimes referred to as health inequities, have garnered an increasing amount of attention from physicians and health policy experts, as well as a renewed focus from federal health agencies. As a complex and multi-factorial construct, differential access to medical care, treatment modalities, and disparate outcomes among various racial and ethnic groups has been validated in numerous studies. The antecedents of such differences involve such "drivers" as cost and access to the healthcare system, primary care physicians, and preventive health services. In addition, the subtle role of bias in creating and/or exacerbating health disparities is well documented in the literature. This article highlights the dimensions and extent of health inequities and emphasizes the challenges facing physicians and others in addressing them.
    Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association 01/2012; 123:167-74.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For the past 30 years, research from investigators at Dartmouth has demonstrated large and persistent variations in costs and quality across the US health care system. Beyond simply showing that cost and quality vary by geography, the Dartmouth Atlas has demonstrated that in many communities, care is so fragmented and ineffective that greater spending on Medicare beneficiaries often leads to worse outcomes1- 2 because some patients receive services that are redundant and low value and that may even have substantial risks.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 03/2012; 307(10):1082-3. DOI:10.1001/jama.2012.287 · 30.39 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Best practice guidelines are being used to an increasing degree, not only by physicians to improve the level of care, but also by bureaucrats to constrain reimbursement and guide the pathways of care.
    Journal of Oncology Practice 07/2012; 8(4):233-5. DOI:10.1200/JOP.2011.000500