Article

Yield of Practice-Based Depression Screening In VA Primary Care Settings

VA Greater Los Angeles Center of Excellence for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 10/2011; 27(3):331-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1904-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many patients who should be treated for depression are missed without effective routine screening in primary care (PC) settings. Yearly depression screening by PC staff is mandated in the VA, yet little is known about the expected yield from such screening when administered on a practice-wide basis.
We characterized the yield of practice-based screening in diverse PC settings, as well as the care needs of those assessed as having depression.
Baseline enrollees in a group randomized trial of implementation of collaborative care for depression.
Randomly sampled patients with a scheduled PC appointment in ten VA primary care clinics spanning five states.
PHQ-2 screening followed by the full PHQ-9 for screen positives, with standardized sociodemographic and health status questions.
Practice-based screening of 10,929 patients yielded 20.1% positive screens, 60% of whom were assessed as having probable major depression based on the PHQ-9 (11.8% of all screens) (n = 1,313). In total, 761 patients with probable major depression completed the baseline assessment. Comorbid mental illnesses (e.g., anxiety, PTSD) were highly prevalent. Medical comorbidities were substantial, including chronic lung disease, pneumonia, diabetes, heart attack, heart failure, cancer and stroke. Nearly one-third of the depressed PC patients reported recent suicidal ideation (based on the PHQ-9). Sexual dysfunction was also common (73.3%), being both longstanding (95.1% with onset >6 months) and frequently undiscussed and untreated (46.7% discussed with any health care provider in past 6 months).
Practice-wide survey-based depression screening yielded more than twice the positive-screen rate demonstrated through chart-based VA performance measures. The substantial level of comorbid physical and mental illness among PC patients precludes solo management by either PC or mental health (MH) specialists. PC practice- and provider-level guideline adherence is problematic without systems-level solutions supporting adequate MH assessment, PC treatment and, when needed, appropriate MH referral.

Full-text

Available from: Barbara F Simon, Jun 02, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
167 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Depression prevalence is between 15% and 20% in coronary heart disease patients, such as those with angina, or after a myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The presence of depression places a coronary heart disease patient at twofold higher risk for further major cardiac events and death, as well as poor quality of life and early exit from the labour force. As a consequence, several learned societies, including the National Heart Foundation of Australia, have published guidelines that recommend questionnaire screening to improve identification and management strategies for depression in coronary heart disease patients. Psychologists in hospitals, community settings, and private practice can have a key role in the realisation of the National Heart Foundation of Australia's aims. We review the recent guidelines and outline implications for psychologists to identify and manage depression in coronary heart disease patients. The evidence reviewed suggests that cognitive-behavioural therapy and problem-solving therapy are frontline non-pharmacological interventions for depression in CHD patients.
    Australian Psychologist 11/2014; 49(6):337–344. DOI:10.1111/ap.12075 · 0.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Primary care screening programs for mental health disorders are designed to detect patients who might benefit from treatment. As such, the utility of these programs is predicated on the actions that take place in response to a positive screen. Our objective was to characterize the cascade of care delivery steps following a positive screen for a mental health disorder. Method We examined the care received by primary care patients over the year following a new positive screen for depression, PTSD, or alcohol misuse. We characterized whether the care adhered to practice guidelines for related mental health disorders and whether involvement of mental health specialists led to higher use of guideline-adherent practices. Results Many patients received appropriate treatment in the primary care setting and those whose scores were consistent with more severe illness were more likely to receive care in a mental health setting. Patients with positive screens for depression and PTSD who went on to be seen in mental health clinics received care that was consistent with treatment guidelines for the related disorder most of the time. In the case of patients with positive screens for alcohol misuse, few received guideline-recommended medications in any setting. However, a substantial portion of patients received some alcohol-related counseling from their primary care physicians during the visit in which their alcohol misuse was detected. Conclusion It appears that the treatment system for mental health problems, which extends from primary care settings to mental health sub-specialty settings, can provide adequate care when patients’ mental health problems are identified through screening. The care provided in all settings can be improved, and additional steps to enhance the quality of care are warranted. This should include additional efforts to align screening and treatment.
    General Hospital Psychiatry 11/2014; 36(6). DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.009 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research conducted in the civilian population demonstrates that cognitive-behavioral therapies are effective for depression, but some evidence suggests that Veterans' treatment response may differ from civilians. This review examined cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for depression in Veteran samples. A literature search for treatment outcome studies with Veteran samples was conducted using PsycInfo, PubMed, and SCOPUS databases. Nine studies met inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological rigor (randomized controlled trials = 5; open trials = 4). Controlled effect sizes were compared for randomized controlled trials, and pre-post effect sizes were used to compare treatment groups across all studies. The open trials reviewed demonstrated large pre-post effect sizes, though these studies were of lower methodological quality. CBT performed better than control treatment in only two of five randomized controlled trials reviewed, a finding that contrasts with research in non-Veteran samples. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed, including psychosocial factors that may influence the course of depression treatment in Veterans. Additional high quality research is needed to conclusively determine if depression treatment outcomes differ for Veterans and, if so, what modifications to current CBT protocols might enhance response to treatment.
    Military medicine 09/2014; 179(9):942-949. DOI:10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00128 · 0.77 Impact Factor