Article

Yield of practice-based depression screening in VA primary care settings.

VA Greater Los Angeles Center of Excellence for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.28). 10/2011; 27(3):331-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1904-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Many patients who should be treated for depression are missed without effective routine screening in primary care (PC) settings. Yearly depression screening by PC staff is mandated in the VA, yet little is known about the expected yield from such screening when administered on a practice-wide basis.
We characterized the yield of practice-based screening in diverse PC settings, as well as the care needs of those assessed as having depression.
Baseline enrollees in a group randomized trial of implementation of collaborative care for depression.
Randomly sampled patients with a scheduled PC appointment in ten VA primary care clinics spanning five states.
PHQ-2 screening followed by the full PHQ-9 for screen positives, with standardized sociodemographic and health status questions.
Practice-based screening of 10,929 patients yielded 20.1% positive screens, 60% of whom were assessed as having probable major depression based on the PHQ-9 (11.8% of all screens) (n = 1,313). In total, 761 patients with probable major depression completed the baseline assessment. Comorbid mental illnesses (e.g., anxiety, PTSD) were highly prevalent. Medical comorbidities were substantial, including chronic lung disease, pneumonia, diabetes, heart attack, heart failure, cancer and stroke. Nearly one-third of the depressed PC patients reported recent suicidal ideation (based on the PHQ-9). Sexual dysfunction was also common (73.3%), being both longstanding (95.1% with onset >6 months) and frequently undiscussed and untreated (46.7% discussed with any health care provider in past 6 months).
Practice-wide survey-based depression screening yielded more than twice the positive-screen rate demonstrated through chart-based VA performance measures. The substantial level of comorbid physical and mental illness among PC patients precludes solo management by either PC or mental health (MH) specialists. PC practice- and provider-level guideline adherence is problematic without systems-level solutions supporting adequate MH assessment, PC treatment and, when needed, appropriate MH referral.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
138 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Depression, an important global health problem, negatively impacts the lives of individuals and their families beyond simply increasing the demand for health services. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of depression and associated mental health issues in individuals older than 14 years of age seeking primary care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three primary care units involved with the Catholic University of Pelotas. Depression, anxiety disorders, and suicide risk were assessed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Factors such as age, gender, solitary living, education, and psychoactive substance use were evaluated using a sociodemographic questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of depression was 23.9% (n = 256). Depression was more prevalent in women with only 4-7 years of education, in women who belong to socioeconomic class D or E, in those who abuse or are dependent on alcohol, or in women who showed an anxiety disorder or suicide risk (p < 0.050). DISCUSSION: Based on these findings, we emphasize the integration of mental health care into primary care through diagnostic evaluations and treatment protocols that cover depression and its comorbidities.
    Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica 12/2011; 39(6):194-197. · 0.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical practice guidelines frequently recommend systematic screening for depression in cancer patients to improve recognition and prompt appropriate management. We aimed to screen major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer inpatients using a structured tool and explore its applicability. Cancer inpatients were routinely screened by nurses using the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ), and for those screened positive, this was followed by a non-mandated referral to a psychiatrist for clinical evaluation and diagnosis. Patients who completed this two-stage procedure comprised the analysis sample. Routine screening of 8800 patients in a period of 27 months yielded 1087 (26.9%) positive first-time screens. Of them, 298 (27.4%) completed the psychiatric consultation. Depressive disorders were diagnosed in 185 patients (62.1%), mainly adjustment disorder (23.8%) and MDD (21.5%). The estimated prevalence of MDD was 21.5%. Area under the curve was 0.72, a result produced by the receiver operating characteristic curve of the TDQ scores relative to the clinical psychiatric diagnoses of MDD. A TDQ cutoff score of ≧26 provided an optimal diagnostic accuracy for MDD. This two-stage depression screening and diagnosing strategy is practical for improving recognition of MDD and other depressive disorders in cancer patients and could be routinely applied, rather than selectively, in a comprehensive cancer care system. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Psycho-Oncology 05/2014; · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Primary care screening programs for mental health disorders are designed to detect patients who might benefit from treatment. As such, the utility of these programs is predicated on the actions that take place in response to a positive screen. Our objective was to characterize the cascade of care delivery steps following a positive screen for a mental health disorder. Method We examined the care received by primary care patients over the year following a new positive screen for depression, PTSD, or alcohol misuse. We characterized whether the care adhered to practice guidelines for related mental health disorders and whether involvement of mental health specialists led to higher use of guideline-adherent practices. Results Many patients received appropriate treatment in the primary care setting and those whose scores were consistent with more severe illness were more likely to receive care in a mental health setting. Patients with positive screens for depression and PTSD who went on to be seen in mental health clinics received care that was consistent with treatment guidelines for the related disorder most of the time. In the case of patients with positive screens for alcohol misuse, few received guideline-recommended medications in any setting. However, a substantial portion of patients received some alcohol-related counseling from their primary care physicians during the visit in which their alcohol misuse was detected. Conclusion It appears that the treatment system for mental health problems, which extends from primary care settings to mental health sub-specialty settings, can provide adequate care when patients’ mental health problems are identified through screening. The care provided in all settings can be improved, and additional steps to enhance the quality of care are warranted. This should include additional efforts to align screening and treatment.
    General Hospital Psychiatry. 01/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
30 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014