Article

Changes in radial artery volume assessed using intravascular ultrasound: a comparison of two vasodilator regimens in transradial coronary interventions.

Cardiology Service, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona.
The Journal of invasive cardiology (Impact Factor: 0.82). 10/2011; 23(10):401-4.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate radial artery volume changes after intraarterial administration of nitroglycerin and/or verapamil.
Radial artery spasm, which is associated with radial artery size, is the main limitation of the transradial approach in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
This prospective, randomized study compared the effect of two intra-arterial vasodilator regimens on radial artery volume: 0.2 mg of nitroglycerin plus 2.5 mg of verapamil (Group 1; n = 15) versus 2.5 mg of verapamil alone (Group 2; n = 15). Radial artery lumen volume was assessed using IVUS at two time points: at baseline (5 minutes after sheath insertion) and post-vasodilator (1 minute after drug administration). The luminal volume of the radial artery was computed using ECOC Random Fields (ECOC-RF), a technique used for automatic segmentation of luminal borders in longitudinal cut images from IVUS sequences.
There was a significant increase in arterial lumen volume in both groups, with an increase from 451 ± 177 mm³ to 508 ± 192 mm³ (p = 0.001) in Group 1 and from 456 ± 188 mm³ to 509 ± 170 mm³ (p = 0.001) in Group 2. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of absolute volume increase (58 mm³ versus 53 mm³, respectively; p = 0.65) or in relative volume increase (14% versus 20%, respectively; p = 0.69).
Administration of nitroglycerin plus verapamil or verapamil alone to the radial artery resulted in similar increases in arterial lumen volume according to ECOC-RF IVUS measurements.

0 Followers
 · 
208 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The success of transradial catheterization depends on meticulous access of radial artery which in turn depends on palpating a good radial pulse. Objectives Our objectives were to analyze the effects of subcutaneously infiltrated nitroglycerin on diameter of radial artery, palpability of radial pulse, ease-of-puncture and pre-cannulation spasm of radial artery during transradial coronary angiography. Methods Patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography were randomized to Group NL or Group SL. In Group NL, 3 ml of solution containing nitroglycerin and lignocaine was infiltrated subcutaneously at the site intended for puncture of radial artery. Similarly, saline and lignocaine were infiltrated in Group SL. Diameter of radial artery was objectively assessed by ultrasonography. Measurements were performed at baseline and repeated at 1 min after injecting the solutions. The ease-of-puncture was evaluated by the number of punctures and the time needed for successful access of radial artery. Results Both groups had 100 patients each. Baseline diameter of radial artery was similar between two groups. The post-injection diameter of radial artery increased by 26.3% in Group NL and 11.4% in Group SL. Nitroglycerin significantly improved the palpability of radial pulse, reduced the number of punctures and shortened the time needed for successful access of radial artery. Pre-cannulation spasm of radial artery occurred in 1% of Group NL and 8% of Group SL. Conclusions Subcutaneously infiltrated nitroglycerin leads to significant vasodilation of radial artery. This avoids pre-cannulation spasm of radial artery, enhances palpability of the radial pulse and thus makes the puncture of radial artery easier.
    Indian Heart Journal 06/2014; 66(6). DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2014.05.023
  • International journal of cardiology 03/2014; 173(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.041
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Verapamil is traditionally applied prophylactically in transradial procedures to prevent radial artery spasm. However, verapamil may have side effects and is contraindicated in some clinical settings. During an investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind trial, we evaluated the need for preventive verapamil administration. After vascular access was established, patients received either 5 mg verapamil (n=297) or placebo (n=294). We compared the rate of access site conversions as primary end point using a superiority margin of 5%. Occurrence of code breaks (composite of conversions and unplanned use of verapamil), overall verapamil use, procedural and fluoroscopic times, contrast volume, and subjective pain were investigated as secondary end points. The rate of access site conversions was not different in the 2 arms (placebo 1.7% versus verapamil 0.7%, P=0.28, difference 1.0%, 95% CI for the difference -1.1% to 3.3%). Proportion of code breaks was similar in the 2 groups (3.4% versus 1.3%, P=0.11), whereas overall verapamil use was markedly lower in the placebo arm (2.0% versus 100%, P<0.0001). Procedural time (median [IQR] 16.0 minutes [9.0 to 30.0 minutes] versus 17.0 minutes [10.0 to 31.0 minutes], P=0.37), fluoroscopic time (4.4 minutes [2.1 to 9.6 minutes] versus 4.8 minutes [2.4 to 10.7 minutes], P=0.28), contrast volume (72.5 mL [48.0 to 146.0 mL] versus 75.5 mL [47.0 to 156.5 mL], P=0.74), and pain score (P for trend=0.12) were comparable in the 2 groups. The preventive use of verapamil may be unnecessary for transradial procedures. The omission of prophylactic verapamil may not only reduce the rate of potential complications related to the drug but also allow the safe extension of the transradial method to those with contraindications to verapamil. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01402427.
    Journal of the American Heart Association 03/2014; 3(2):e000588. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.113.000588