Investigation of lipid composition of dissected sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients by 7T proton MR spectroscopy

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Impact Factor: 3.21). 02/2012; 35(2):387-92. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22820
Source: PubMed


To determine lipid composition of excised healthy and metastatic sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients, as lipids are a potential discriminatory marker for malignancy.
Ten breast cancer patients undergoing surgical nodal staging were included. (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic images (MRSI) were acquired without water and lipid suppression (resolution 3.0 × 3.0 × 5.0 mm(3)). MRSI was compared to histopathology. Six groups of lipid resonances (5.4-5.2, 4.3-4.1, 2.8, 2.3-2.0, 1.6-1.3, 0.9 ppm) were identified. The intensity ratios of the total of these resonances to this total including the water resonance and of each lipid resonance to the total of all lipid resonances were determined. For statistical analysis, a mixed model was applied after logistic transformation. The results were expressed as ratios of the median values of these lipid compositions in metastatic to benign nodes.
In all, 6/32 (19%) of the excised nodes contained metastases. The ratios of the lipid resonances 5.4-5.2, 4.3-4.1, 2.8, 2.3-2.0, 1.6-1.3, 0.9 ppm between metastatic vs. benign were 0.3, 1.2, 0.2, 0.2, 1.2, and 0.9, respectively. Only the ratios of signals from unsaturated fatty acids to the total lipid signal differed significantly.
Metastatic axillary lymph nodes contained fewer unsaturated fatty acids than benign nodes. 7T (1)H-MRS may be useful for detecting axillary breast cancer metastases.

7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter reviews articles on NMR and lipids published between June 2011 and May 2012. The number of papers devoted to NMR utilization to investigate lipids, their structures, behavior in native and artificial membranes, interactions with proteins and peptides, as well as with low molecular weight compounds, and biomedical applications is quite large (over 1100 articles in Pub-Med) although we included here only a selection of those papers that were accessible and peer-reviewed. The reviewed material has been arranged in sections devoted to the structure and function of lipids in membranes, their roles in membrane-related processes including membrane fusion and lipid-mediated signal transduction, interactions of lipids with membrane and soluble proteins, peptides and antibiotics, lipid metabolomics, visualization of lipid related processes in biomedicine, diagnosis and therapy, as well as methodological approaches.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the behavior of lipid olefinic and diallylic resonances as a function of PRESS (point resolved spectroscopy) echo time (TE) to determine an optimal long TE value for their measurement at 3 T. Experiments were conducted on nine oils (almond, canola, cod liver, corn, linseed, peanut, sesame, sunflower, and walnut oil) and on vertebral and tibial bone marrow in vivo at 3 T. The methylene (or methyl + methylene), diallylic, and olefinic resonances were measured with PRESS with multiple TEs. J-coupling evolution effects on the olefinic and diallylic peaks appeared to be minimized when TE = 200 msec. The TE = 200 msec olefinic/methylene and diallylic/methylene peak area ratios calculated for each oil correlated well with ratios deduced from oil compositions in the literature (R2 = 0.92 and 0.98 for the olefinic and diallylic protons, respectively). In addition, the relative amounts of bone marrow unsaturation of vertebral and tibial bone marrow inferred from the TE = 200 msec olefinic/(methyl + methylene) peak area ratio agreed with values estimated from the literature. A PRESS sequence with a long TE value of 200 msec is suitable for determining relative amounts of lipid unsaturation at 3 T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:944–949.
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 04/2013; 37(4). DOI:10.1002/jmri.23868 · 3.21 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 08/2014; 40(2). DOI:10.1002/jmri.24444 · 3.21 Impact Factor
Show more