Examining Stools for Colon Cancer Prevention: What Are We Really Looking for?

Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, 80045, USA.
Cancer Prevention Research (Impact Factor: 4.89). 10/2011; 4(10):1531-3. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0410
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is superior to guiac-based testing if we are looking for blood in stools, as it has better one-time colorectal cancer sensitivity and specificity and better patient acceptance. In this issue of the journal, Cai and colleagues (beginning on page 1572) and Khalid-de Bakker and colleagues (beginning on page 1563) present new information about the one-time test performance of FIT. FIT will have a growing appeal to providers and health care systems as resources for clinical preventive services shrink and as incentives to expand colorectal screening rates increase, but there are good reasons to be cautious about the temptation to organize new FIT screening programs. Colorectal screening has two potential objectives: To find cancers in an earlier, more-treatable stage and to find and remove adenomas to prevent cancers from forming in the first place. Because most adenomas, even advanced adenomas, do not bleed, tests designed to identify occult blood in the stool are better for detecting colorectal cancer, whereas direct endoscopic visualization of the colorectum is better for prevention. Even if advanced adenomas did commonly bleed, low compliance with repeat annual testing will seriously erode the benefit of FIT.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Each year the American Cancer Society (ACS) publishes a summary of its recommendations for early cancer detection, a report on data and trends in cancer screening rates, and select issues related to cancer screening. In this issue of the journal, current ACS cancer screening guidelines are summarized, as are updated guidelines on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening with low-dose helical computed tomography. The latest data on the use of cancer screening from the National Health Interview Survey also are described, as are several issues related to screening coverage under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
    CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 02/2013; DOI:10.3322/caac.21174 · 153.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, is preventable with effective screening and removal of precursor lesions. Yet, screening efforts have been hampered by low participation rates and by performance limitations of the screening tools themselves. Stool DNA testing has emerged as a biologically rational and user-friendly strategy for the non-invasive detection of both CRC and critical precursor lesions. Unlike most conventional screening tools, stool DNA testing detects proximal and distal colorectal neoplasms equally well. Several key technical advances have led to increasingly accurate approaches for stool DNA testing including use of a DNA preservative buffer with stool collection, efficient target capture and amplification methods, broadly informative marker panels, and automated assay components. Based on recent studies, advanced multi-marker stool DNA tests including methylated markers, mutation markers and an assessment of faecal haemoglobin have been shown to detect CRC at sensitivities of 85% and higher and adenomas >1 cm at 60% and higher in a case-control environment. If the high accuracy of multi-marker stool tests is corroborated in multicentre screening studies on average-risk persons currently underway, then these stool tests could influence our CRC screening paradigm.This review discusses the biological basis, key technical advances, and recent clinical performance validation of stool DNA testing.
    Pathology 12/2011; 44(2):80-8. DOI:10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283502fdf · 2.62 Impact Factor