Brief Strategic Family Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual: Results of a Multisite Randomized Trial for Substance Using Adolescents

Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL, USA.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 10/2011; 79(6):713-27. DOI: 10.1037/a0025477
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the effectiveness of brief strategic family therapy (BSFT; an evidence-based family therapy) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) as provided in community-based adolescent outpatient drug abuse programs.
A randomized effectiveness trial in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network compared BSFT to TAU with a multiethnic sample of adolescents (213 Hispanic, 148 White, and 110 Black) referred for drug abuse treatment at 8 community treatment agencies nationwide. Randomization encompassed both adolescents' families (n = 480) and the agency therapists (n = 49) who provided either TAU or BSFT services. The primary outcome was adolescent drug use, assessed monthly via adolescent self-report and urinalysis for up to 1 year post randomization. Secondary outcomes included treatment engagement (≥2 sessions), retention (≥8 sessions), and participants' reports of family functioning 4, 8, and 12 months following randomization.
No overall differences between conditions were observed in the trajectories of self-reports of adolescent drug use. However, the median number of days of self-reported drug use was significantly higher, χ2(1) = 5.40, p < .02, in TAU (Mdn = 3.5, interquartile range [IQR] = 11) than BSFT (Mdn = 2, IQR = 9) at the final observation point. BSFT was significantly more effective than TAU in engaging, χ2(1) = 11.33, p < .001, and retaining, χ2(1) = 5.66, p < .02, family members in treatment and in improving parent reports of family functioning, χ2(2) = 9.10, p < .011.
We discuss challenges in treatment implementation in community settings and provide recommendations for further research.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report relies on official crime data, law enforcement intelligence, census data, and ethnographic interviews to assess the nature and extent of the gang problem in Niagara Falls, NY. It finds that street gangs are firmly entrenched on the streets of Niagara Falls, and that they are fueled by high poverty rates, a vibrant underground illicit economy, and the dissemination of gang culture across geographical locations. We also identify that the city of Niagara Falls has experienced escalating rates of violence that contrast national trends. We examine the extent to which street gangs may be involved in localized violence and note that interpersonal violence appears to be a growing problem in the city, but gangs are not yet involved in patterns of contagious murder. They are, however, heavily involved in drug dealing and may increasingly be demonstrating a willingness to use excessive forms of violence (guns) to resolve interpersonal disputes. Moreover, gangs and gang members appear to evolve and become more sophisticated as they remain active in street life. This report concludes with a discussion of viable solutions for dealing with street gangs in Niagara Falls.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: In this article we describe and assess the state of the science on systemic psychotherapies. In the quarter century since the first issue of Psychotherapy Research was published, considerable progress has been made. There is an increasingly solid evidence base for systemic treatments, which includes a wide range of approaches to working conjointly with couples and families. Moreover, there are exciting new developments that hold promise for explicating the dynamic processes of therapeutic change in couple and family systems. Method: We begin by explaining how we view "systemic therapies" as different from individual approaches and then summarize what we have learned in the past 25 years about this set of treatments, how we have learned it, and what we have yet to learn. Results and Conclusions: We consider current trends in research on outcomes and change process mechanisms, and end with speculations about what lies ahead in the interrelated domains of systemic research and practice.
    Psychotherapy Research 03/2015; DOI:10.1080/10503307.2014.983208 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Science has always been a central part of family therapy. Research by early pioneers focused on studying the efficacy of both couple and family interventions from a systemic perspective. Today we know more now than ever before about the processes of diverse families and the therapeutic outcomes of family therapy practices. Despite the acknowledged importance of family therapy research, there are still questions about its impact on "real life" practice. Despite all the flaws of each, research and practice are critical interacting elements of a dialectic relationship: High-quality practice combines reliable scientific knowledge with individual clinical judgment made by family therapists in the context of their dynamic transactions with a family or couple. Future research can help uncover the mechanisms we have yet to know and test the ones we have identified while the dynamic interaction of research and practice that can lead to further innovations and developments central to the future of family therapy.
    Family Process 06/2014; 53(3). DOI:10.1111/famp.12084 · 1.73 Impact Factor


Available from
May 31, 2014