Exposure and emissions monitoring during carbon nanofiber production--Part I: elemental carbon and iron-soot aerosols.

Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS-R5, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
Annals of Occupational Hygiene (Impact Factor: 2.07). 09/2011; 55(9):1016-36. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mer073
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Production of carbon nanofibers and nanotubes (CNFs/CNTs) and their composite products is increasing globally. High volume production may increase the exposure risks for workers who handle these materials. Though health effects data for CNFs/CNTs are limited, some studies raise serious health concerns. Given the uncertainty about their potential hazards, there is an immediate need for toxicity data and field studies to assess exposure to CNFs/CNTs. An extensive study was conducted at a facility that manufactures and processes CNFs. Filter, sorbent, cascade impactor, bulk, and microscopy samples, combined with direct-reading instruments, provided complementary information on air contaminants. Samples were analyzed for organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), with EC as a measure of CNFs. Transmission electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy also was applied. Fine/ultrafine iron-rich soot, PAHs, and carbon monoxide were production byproducts. Direct-reading instrument results were reported previously [Evans DE et al. (Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann Occup Hyg 2010;54:514-31.)] Results for time-integrated samples are reported as companion papers in this Issue. OC and EC, metals, and microscopy results are reported here, in Part I, while results for PAHs are reported in Part II [Birch ME. (Exposure and Emissions Monitoring during Carbon Nanofiber Production-Part II: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Ann. Occup. Hyg 2011; 55: 1037-47.)]. Respirable EC area concentrations inside the facility were about 6-68 times higher than outdoors, while personal breathing zone samples were up to 170 times higher.


Available from: Douglas E Evans, Jun 02, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The novel physicochemical properties of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) make them very attractive for industrial and biomedical purposes, but concerns have been raised regarding unpredictable adverse health effects in humans. Current evidence for the risk posed by ENPs to exposed workers is the subject of this review. Aims To perform an in-depth review of the state of art of nanoparticle exposure at work. Methods Original articles and reviews in Pubmed and in principal databases of medical literature up to 2013 were included in the analysis. In addition, grey literature released by qualified regulatory agencies and by governmental and non-governmental organizations was also taken into consideration. Results There are significant knowledge and technical gaps to be filled for a reliable evaluation of the risk posed for workers by ENPs. Evidence for potential workplace release of ENPs however seems substantial, and the amount of exposure may exceed the proposed occupational exposure limits (OELs). The rational use of conventional engineering measures and of protective personal equipment seems to mitigate the risk. Conclusions A precautionary approach is recommended for workplace exposure to ENPs, until health-based OELs are developed and released by official regulatory agencies.
    Occupational Medicine 07/2014; 64(5):319-330. DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqu051 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective was to characterize and compare the tensile and compressive mechanical behavior of polymer nanocomposites under both quasi-static and dynamic compressive and tensile loadings. The materials studied included HDPE (high density polyethylene), HDPE/CNF (carbon nanofiber) and HDPE/CNF-GNP (graphite nanoplatelet). Microstructure analyses were also conducted to gain insight into the possible deformation and fracture mechanisms for the observed macroscopic mechanical behavior. The tensile strengths were observed to be lower than the corresponding compression strengths under dynamic loadings, but higher under static loadings. Regarding the strengthening effects due to nanofillers, it was observed that addition of GNP appeared to have somewhat reduced the compressive strength, but improved the tensile strength. Possible mechanisms for the observed tension-compression asymmetry exhibited by both the macroscopic behavior and the reinforcement effects are discussed.KeywordsDynamic loadingSplit Hopkinson barPolymer nanocompositeTension-compression asymmetry
    Polymer Testing 02/2015; 41. DOI:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.11.003 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adverse lung effects following pulmonary exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are well documented in rodents. However, systemic effects are less understood. Epidemiological studies have shown increased cardiovascular disease risk after pulmonary exposure to airborne particles, which has led to concerns that inhalation exposure to MWCNTs might pose similar risks.
    Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 01/2015; 283(3). DOI:10.1016/j.taap.2015.01.011 · 3.63 Impact Factor