Article

Nephron formation adopts a novel spatial topology at cessation of nephrogenesis.

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Australia.
Developmental Biology (Impact Factor: 3.64). 09/2011; 360(1):110-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.09.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nephron number in the mammalian kidney is known to vary dramatically, with postnatal renal function directly influenced by nephron complement. What determines final nephron number is poorly understood but nephron formation in the mouse kidney ceases within the first few days after birth, presumably due to the loss of all remaining nephron progenitors via epithelial differentiation. What initiates this event is not known. Indeed, whether nephron formation occurs in the same way at this time as during embryonic development has also not been examined. In this study, we investigate the key cellular compartments involved in nephron formation; the ureteric tip, cap mesenchyme and early nephrons; from postnatal day (P) 0 to 6 in the mouse. High resolution analyses of gene and protein expression indicate that loss of nephron progenitors precedes loss of ureteric tip identity, but show spatial shifts in the expression of cap mesenchyme genes during this time. In addition, cap mesenchymal volume and rate of proliferation decline prior to birth. Section-based 3D modeling and Optical Projection Tomography revealed a burst of ectopic nephron induction, with the formation of multiple (up to 5) nephrons per ureteric tip evident from P2. While the distal-proximal patterning of these nephrons occurred normally, their spatial relationship with the ureteric compartment was altered. We propose that this phase of nephron formation represents an acceleration of differentiation within the cap mesenchyme due to a displacement of signals within the nephrogenic niche.

1 Bookmark
 · 
117 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The mammalian kidney forms via cell-cell interactions between an epithelial outgrowth of the nephric duct and the surrounding nephrogenic mesenchyme. Initial morphogenetic events include ureteric bud branching to form the collecting duct (CD) tree and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions to form the nephrons, requiring reciprocal induction between adjacent mesenchyme and epithelial cells. Within the tips of the branching ureteric epithelium, cells respond to mesenchyme-derived trophic factors by proliferation, migration, and mitosis-associated cell dispersal. Self-inhibition signals from one tip to another play a role in branch patterning. The position, survival, and fate of the nephrogenic mesenchyme are regulated by ECM and secreted signals from adjacent tip and stroma. Signals from the ureteric tip promote mesenchyme self-renewal and trigger nephron formation. Subsequent fusion to the CDs, nephron segmentation and maturation, and formation of a patent glomerular basement membrane also require specialized cell-cell interactions. Differential cadherin, laminin, nectin, and integrin expression, as well as intracellular kinesin and actin-mediated regulation of cell shape and adhesion, underlies these cell-cell interactions. Indeed, the capacity for the kidney to form via self-organization has now been established both via the recapitulation of expected morphogenetic interactions after complete dissociation and reassociation of cellular components during development as well as the in vitro formation of 3D kidney organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. As we understand more about how the many cell-cell interactions required for kidney formation operate, this enables the prospect of bioengineering replacement structures based on these self-organizing properties. © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Current Topics in Developmental Biology 01/2015; 112:467-508. DOI:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2014.12.002 · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although kidneys of equal size can vary 10-fold in nephron number at birth, discovering what regulates such variation has been hampered by a lack of quantitative parameters defining kidney development. Here we report a comprehensive, quantitative, multiscale analysis of mammalian kidney development in which we measure changes in cell number, compartment volumes, and cellular dynamics across the entirety of organogenesis, focusing on two key nephrogenic progenitor populations: the ureteric epithelium and the cap mesenchyme. In doing so, we describe a discontinuous developmental program governed by dynamic changes in interactions between these key cellular populations occurring within a previously unappreciated structurally stereotypic organ architecture. We also illustrate the application of this approach to the detection of a subtle mutant phenotype. This baseline program of kidney morphogenesis provides a framework for assessing genetic and environmental developmental perturbation and will serve as a gold standard for the analysis of other organs.
    Developmental Cell 04/2014; 29(2):188-202. DOI:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.017 · 10.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent years have challenged the view that adult somatic cells reach a state of terminal differentiation. While the ultimate example of this, somatic cell nuclear transfer, has not proven feasible in humans, dedifferentiation of mature cell types to a more primitive state, direct reprogramming from one mature state to another and the reprogramming of any adult cell type to a pluripotent state via enforced expression of key transcription factors have all now been demonstrated. The implications of these findings for kidney disease include the recreation of key renal cell types from more readily available and expandable somatic cell sources. The feasibility of such an approach has been recently demonstrated with the dedifferentiation of proximal tubule cells to nephrogenic mesenchyme. In this review, we examine the technical challenges and clinical challenges that remain to such an approach and how new reprogramming approaches may also be useful for kidney disease.
    Seminars in Nephrology 07/2014; 34(4). DOI:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2014.06.012 · 2.94 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
69 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014