Profiling Health and Health-Related Services for Children With Special Health Care Needs With and Without Disabilities

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Academic pediatrics (Impact Factor: 2.01). 09/2011; 11(6):508-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.08.004
Source: PubMed


The aims of this study were to profile and compare the health and health services characteristics for children with special health care needs (CSHCN), with and without disabilities, and to determine factors associated with unmet need.
Secondary data analysis of the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs was conducted. The sociodemographics, health, and health services of CSHCN with and without disabilities were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to examine factors associated with unmet need for health services.
Children from minority racial and ethnic groups and children living in or near poverty were over-represented among CSHCN with disabilities, compared with other CSHCN. Statistically higher percentages of CSHCN with disabilities had behavioral problems (39.6% vs 25.2%), anxiety/depressed mood (46.1% vs 24.0%), and trouble making/keeping friends (38.1% vs 15.6%) compared with other CSHCN. Thirty-two percent of CSHCN with disabilities received care in a medical home compared with 51% of other CSHCN. CSHCN with disabilities had higher rates of need and unmet need than other CSHCN for specialty care, therapy services, mental health services, home health, assistive devices, medical supplies, and durable medical equipment. The adjusted odds of unmet need for CSHCN with disabilities were 71% higher than for other CSHCN.
CSHCN with disabilities had more severe health conditions and more health services need, but they less commonly received care within a medical home and had more unmet need. These health care inequities should be amenable to policy and health service delivery interventions to improve outcomes for CSHCN with disabilities.

Download full-text


Available from: Amy J Houtrow, Jul 12, 2014
18 Reads
  • Source
    • "Sibling's mental health and well-being can also be affected (Moyson & Roeyers 2012, Newton et al. 2010, Redshaw & Wilson 2012, Welch et al. 2012). Whilst parents attach importance to home-based care (Carnevale et al. 2008, Carter et al. 2012, McCann et al. 2012, Thomas et al. 2011) support services are not always readily available (Dybwik et al. 2011, Heath et al. 2012, Houtrow et al. 2011, Winitzer et al. 2012). Only a minority of families can access regular respite care (Doig et al. 2009, Grinyer et al. 2010, Neff 2009, Simkiss 2012) or comprehensive palliative care (Bradford et al. 2012, Jones 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with life-limiting and disabling conditions are surviving longer than previously, and many require palliative and supportive care, usually at home. Home-based care can put family life under considerable strain, as parents care for their child's complex, often unpredictable, continuing care needs. Rainbow Trust Children's Charity aims to bridge gaps in services for children with life-threatening or terminal conditions by providing family support workers (FSWs). The study used a range of methods (surveys, interviews and ethnographic observation) approach to explore key aspects of the work of the FSWs. The target population for the surveys was families with a child having complex, life-threatening or terminal conditions receiving care from FSWs. The participants included 55 families (12 bereaved) and 39 children aged 2-18 years. Thematic analysis revealed how the FSWs became a presence in families' lives in three main ways: (1) encompassing and embracing families through supporting needs and promoting resilience; (2) befriending and bonding through developing knowledge, trusting relationships and a sense of closeness; and (3) accompanying and enduring by 'being with' families in different settings, situations and crises and by enduring alongside the families. The study demonstrated the fundamental importance of workers who are able to provide aspects of support that is usually not provided by other services.
    Journal of Child Health Care 01/2014; 19(3). DOI:10.1177/1367493513516391 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are at risk for decreased participation in educational and social activities, which can negatively impact their lives. The objectives of this study were to document the presence of participation restrictions for CSHCN compared with other children and to determine how personal and environmental factors are associated with participation restrictions for CSHCN. The 2007 National Survey of Children's Health was analyzed to evaluate 2 participation outcomes for children aged 6 to 17 years, ie, school attendance and participation in organized activities, and 2 participation outcomes for children aged 12 to 17 years, ie, working for pay and volunteering. Adjusted prevalences of participation restrictions were calculated for children with and without special health care needs. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with participation restrictions for CSHCN. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, a greater proportion of CSHCN (27.9%) reported missing more than 5 days of school than other children (15.1%). In contrast, no differences were found for participation in organized activities, working for pay, or volunteering. CSHCN with functional limitations were more likely to experience all 4 types of participation restrictions compared with other CSHCN and non-CSHCN. For CSHCN, the odds of certain participation restrictions were greater for those with functional limitations, in fair/poor health, with depressed mood, living at or near the federal poverty level, and living in homes not headed by two parents. CSHCN with functional limitations and those with worse health status are at elevated risk of experiencing participation restrictions than other children. Social disadvantage furthers the likelihood that CSHCN will experience participation restrictions.
    Academic pediatrics 06/2012; 12(4):326-34. DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2012.03.004 · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To identify and describe selected key characteristics of children with neurodevelopmental disorders and disabilities (NDD/D) in a national disability survey database. Method: Secondary analysis of data on children aged 5-14 years in the Canadian Participation and Activity Limitation Survey (PALS). Children with NDD/D were ascertained from ICD-10 diagnoses "fine-tuned" with functional limitation information, and classified into six predetermined NDD/D subtypes by independent expert evaluators. Results: Children with NDD/D accounted for 73.5% of children with disabilities. Amongst children with a single NDD/D type, 28.8% were in the Cognition-Learning subgroup, 22.2% Psychological, 19.9% Social interactive, 13.3% Sensory, 10.6% Motor and 5.2% Speech-Language disorders/disabilities. Complexity, both diagnostic (more than one ICD-10 diagnosis) and functional (more than one parent-identified functional limitation), was encountered frequently though variably across NDD/D subtypes. In aligning parent-identified functional limitation information with researcher-ascertained assignment of children to NDD/D subgroups, matching with additional limitations (61.3% of children) occurred far more commonly than simple 1:1 matches (14.0%) or non-matching (24.7%). Conclusions: Conceptual, definitional and terminology issues affect population-based research on children with NDD/D. Ascertainment methods can use diagnostic as well as functional information. Diagnostic information alone is likely to under-represent the complexity and needs of children with NDD/D and their families.
    Disability and Rehabilitation 07/2012; 35(6). DOI:10.3109/09638288.2012.699580 · 1.99 Impact Factor
Show more