Article

A DNA Repair Complex Functions as an Oct4/Sox2 Coactivator in Embryonic Stem Cells

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Cell (Impact Factor: 33.12). 09/2011; 147(1):120-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.038
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The transcriptional activators Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog cooperate with a wide array of cofactors to orchestrate an embryonic stem (ES) cell-specific gene expression program that forms the molecular basis of pluripotency. Here, we report using an unbiased in vitro transcription-biochemical complementation assay to discover a multisubunit stem cell coactivator complex (SCC) that is selectively required for the synergistic activation of the Nanog gene by Oct4 and Sox2. Purification, identification, and reconstitution of SCC revealed this coactivator to be the trimeric XPC-nucleotide excision repair complex. SCC interacts directly with Oct4 and Sox2 and is recruited to the Nanog and Oct4 promoters as well as a majority of genomic regions that are occupied by Oct4 and Sox2. Depletion of SCC/XPC compromised both pluripotency in ES cells and somatic cell reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. This study identifies a transcriptional coactivator with diversified functions in maintaining ES cell pluripotency and safeguarding genome integrity.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Claudia Cattoglio, Jul 16, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
204 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Embryonic stem (ES) cells were first isolated in 1981 in the mouse from the in vitro proliferation of the inner cell mass of a 3.5 days post-coitum (dpc) blastocyst. Later on, epiblast stem cells (EpiSC) were identified from in vitro culture of the epiblast of a 6.5 dpc mouse embryo, leading to the concept of naïve and primed stem cells. Among non-mammalian species, ES cells have been characterized both in birds and fish; here, we focus on cells derived from chicken and the pluripotent associated markers such as OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, and KLF, previously identified in mammalian cells. In this review, we present both published and original data regarding the involvement of those pluripotent associated genes in the ES cells and early embryo of chicken.
    Development Growth and Regeneration 12/2012; DOI:10.1111/dgd.12021 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency depends on a well-characterized gene regulatory network centered on Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog. In contrast, little is known about the identity of the key coregulators and the mechanisms by which they may potentiate transcription in ESCs. Alongside core transcription factors, the orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb (estrogen-related receptor β) is vital for the maintenance of ESC identity and furthermore is uniquely associated with the basal transcription machinery. Here, we show that Ncoa3, an essential coactivator, is required to mediate Esrrb function in ESCs. Ncoa3 interacts with Esrrb via its ligand-binding domain and bridges Esrrb to RNA polymerase II complexes. Functionally, Ncoa3 is critical for both the induction and maintenance of pluripotency. Through chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing and microarray experiments, we further demonstrate that Ncoa3 shares overlapping gene regulatory functions with Esrrb and cooperates genome-wide with the Oct4-Sox2-Nanog circuitry at active enhancers to up-regulate genes involved in self-renewal and pluripotency. We propose an integrated model of transcriptional and coactivator control, mediated by Ncoa3, for the maintenance of ESC self-renewal and somatic cell reprogramming.
    Genes & development 09/2012; 26(20):2286-98. DOI:10.1101/gad.195545.112 · 12.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cellular reprogramming involves the artificial dedifferentiation of somatic cells to a pluripotent state. When affected by overexpressing specific transcription factors, the process is highly inefficient, as only 0.1-1% of cells typically undergo the transformation. This low efficiency has been attributed to high kinetic barriers that affect all cells equally and can only be overcome by rare stochastic events. The barriers to reprogramming are likely to involve transformations of chromatin state because (i) inhibitors of chromatin-modifying enzymes can enhance the efficiency of reprogramming and (ii) knockdown or knock-out of chromatin-modifying enzymes can lower the efficiency of reprogramming. Here, we review the relationship between chromatin state transformations (chromatin reprogramming) and cellular reprogramming, with an emphasis on transcription factors, chromatin remodeling factors, histone modifications and DNA methylation.
    Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 07/2012; 47(5):464-82. DOI:10.3109/10409238.2012.697125 · 5.81 Impact Factor

Similar Publications