The Lively Legs self-management programme increased physical activity and reduced wound days in leg ulcer patients: Results from a randomized controlled trial

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
International journal of nursing studies (Impact Factor: 2.25). 09/2011; 49(2):151-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Investigating the effectiveness of the Lively Legs program for promoting adherence with ambulant compression therapy and physical exercise as well as effects on leg ulcer recurrence.
A randomized controlled trial.
Eleven outpatient clinics for dermatology in the Netherlands participated in the study.
184 patients attending the outpatient clinic with leg ulcers based dominantly on a venous aetiology. Randomization was stratified by centre, age, sex and aetiology (purely venous or mixed).
The intervention group received additionally to usual care, lifestyle counselling according to the Lively Legs program, the control group received care as usual. Patient behaviour on physical activity (IPAQ), adherence to compression therapy and wound status were assessed every 6 months during a follow-up period of 18 months. Data analysis was based on the intention to treat principle, using a generalized linear model with additive link function and Bernouilli distributions. Effects on recurrence were analyzed after the first ulcer had healed using proportional hazard regression.
The results showed an increase in adherence with compression therapy in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. The intervention group performed significantly better on conducting leg exercises (p<0.01) and 10 min walks at five days a week (p<0.01). There was no difference on reaching 30 min of walking on 5 days a week. The intervention group had less wound days (p<0.01), time till recurrence did not differ significantly (p=0.07).
The Lively Legs program effectively increased the use of leg exercises and walking behaviour, and decreased wound time, however it did not significantly enhance use of compression stockings. Non significant effects regarding secondary outcomes may relate to the frailty of the sample.

Download full-text


Available from: Rob A B Oostendorp, Aug 20, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a home-based exercise programme and examine the effects on the healing rates of venous leg ulcers. A 12-week randomised controlled trial was conducted investigating the effects of an exercise intervention compared to a usual care group. Participants in both groups (n = 13) had active venous ulceration and were treated in a metropolitan hospital outpatients clinic in Australia. Data were collected on recruitment from medical records, clinical assessment and questionnaires. Follow-up data on progress in healing and treatments were collected fortnightly for 12 weeks. Calf muscle pump function data were collected at baseline and 12 weeks from recruitment. Range of ankle motion data were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks from recruitment. This pilot study indicated that the intervention was feasible. Clinical significance was observed in the intervention group with a 32% greater decrease in ulcer size (P = 0·34) than the usual care group, and a 10% (P = 0·74) improvement in the number of participants healed in the intervention group compared to the usual care group. Significant differences between groups over time were observed in calf muscle pump function parameters [ejection fraction (P = 0·05), residual volume fraction (P = 0·04)] and range of ankle motion (P = 0·01). This pilot study is one of the first studies to examine and measure clinical healing rates for participants involved in a home-based progressive resistance exercise programme. Further research is warranted with a larger multi-site study.
    International Wound Journal 06/2012; 10(4). DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00995.x · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Implementation of lifestyle interventions in patient care is a major challenge. Understanding factors that influence implementation is a first step in programs to enhance uptake of these interventions. A lifestyle-counseling intervention, Lively Legs, delivered by trained nurses, can effectively improve the lifestyle in patients with venous leg ulcers. The aim of this study was to identify factors that hindered or facilitated implementation of this intervention in outpatient dermatology clinics and in home care. Methods A mixed-methods multiple case study in five purposefully selected healthcare settings in the Netherlands was conducted. Measurements to identify influencing factors before and after implementation of Lively Legs included interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, and nurses’ registration. Analyses focused on qualitative data as the main data source. All data were compared across multiple cases to draw conclusions from the study as a whole. Results A total of 53 patients enrolled in the Lively Legs program, which was delivered by 12 trained nurses. Barriers for implementation were mainly organizational. It was difficult to effectively organize reaching and recruiting patients for the program, especially in home care. Main barriers were a lack of a standardized healthcare delivery process, insufficient nursing time, and a lack of motivated nurses to deliver the program. Facilitating factors were nurse-driven coordination of care and a standardized care process to tie Lively Legs into, as this resulted in better patient recruitment and better program implementation. Conclusions This study identified a range of factors influencing the implementation of a lifestyle-counseling program, mainly related to the organization of healthcare. Using a case study method proved valuable in obtaining insight into influencing factors for implementation. This study also shed light on a more general issue, which is that leg ulcer care is often fragmented, indicating that quality improvement is needed.
    Implementation Science 10/2012; 7(1):104. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-7-104 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many surgeons recommend rest and restricting activities to their patients after surgery. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature regarding types of activities gynecologic surgeons restrict and intra-abdominal pressure during specific activities and to provide an overview of negative effects of sedentary behavior (rest). We searched PubMed and Scopus for years 1970 until present and excluded studies that described recovery of activities of daily living after surgery as well as those that assessed intra-abdominal pressure for other reasons such as abdominal compartment syndrome and hypertension. For our review of intra-abdominal pressure, we excluded studies that did not include a generally healthy population, or did not report maximal intra-abdominal pressures. We identified no randomized trial or prospective cohort study that studied the association between postoperative activity and surgical success after pelvic floor repair. The ranges of intra-abdominal pressures during specific activities are large and such pressures during activities commonly restricted and not restricted after surgery overlap considerably. There is little concordance in mean peak intra-abdominal pressures across studies. Intra-abdominal pressure depends on many factors, but not least the manner in which it is measured and reported. Given trends towards shorter hospital stays and off work intervals, which both predispose women to higher levels of physical activity, we urge research efforts towards understanding the role of physical activity on recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence after surgery.
    International Urogynecology Journal 01/2013; 24(5). DOI:10.1007/s00192-012-2026-2 · 2.16 Impact Factor
Show more