Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Arthritis care & research 02/2012; 64(2):229-37. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20646
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the impact of a videobooklet patient decision aid supplemented by an interactive values clarification exercise on decisional conflict in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) considering total knee arthroplasty.
A total of 208 patients participated in the study (mean age 63 years, 68% female, and 66% white). Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: 1) educational booklet on OA management (control), 2) patient decision aid (videobooklet) on OA management, and 3) patient decision aid (videobooklet) + adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA) tool. The ACA tool enables patients to consider competing attributes (i.e., specific risks/benefits) by asking them to rate a series of paired comparisons. The primary outcome was the decisional conflict scale ranging from 0-100. Differences between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference tests.
Overall, decisional conflict decreased significantly in all groups (P < 0.05). The largest reduction in decisional conflict was observed for participants in the videobooklet decision aid group (21 points). Statistically significant differences in pre- versus postintervention total scores favored the videobooklet group compared to the control group (21 versus 10) and to the videobooklet plus ACA group (21 versus 14; P < 0.001). Changes in the decisional conflict score for the control group compared to the videobooklet decision aid + ACA group were not significantly different.
In our study, an audiovisual patient decision aid decreased decisional conflict more than printed material alone or the addition of a more complex computer-based ACA tool requiring more intense cognitive involvement and explicit value choices.

Download full-text


Available from: Maria E Suarez-Almazor, Aug 25, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent scientific advances in the treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) relating to education, exercise, weight control and passive non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments such as manual therapy, orthoses/orthotics and other aids are described. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline from July 2011 to 10 April 2012 using the terms 'osteoarthritis, knee', 'osteoarthritis, hip' rehabilitation, physical therapy, exercise therapy and preoperative intervention; both as text words and as MeSH terms where possible. Trials evaluating rehabilitation interventions were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or systematic reviews. Outcome papers were identified by combining the initial search with the terms 'outcome', 'measure*', 'valid*', 'reliabil*' or 'responsiveness'. Outcome studies were included if they contributed methodologically to advancing outcome measurement. The literature search identified 550 potentially relevant papers. Seventeen RCTs on rehabilitation were selected and the results from these were supported by six systematic reviews. Sixteen outcomes papers were considered relevant, but did not add significantly to current knowledge about outcome measures in OA and so, were not included. The current research focus on non-pharmacological and non-surgical treatments for hip and/or knee OA, when combined in systematic reviews, is improving the available evidence to identify best practice treatment. Education, exercise and weight loss are effective in the long term and supported as cost-effective first-line treatments.
    Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 09/2012; 20(12):1477-83. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.028 · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Decision making in knee osteoarthritis, with many treatment options, challenges patients and physicians alike. Unfortunately, physicians cannot describe in detail each treatment's benefits and risks. One promising adjunct to decision making in osteoarthritis is adaptive conjoint analysis (ACA). OBJECTIVE: To obtain insight into the experiences of elderly patients who use adaptive conjoint analysis to explore treatment options for their osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Participants, all 65 and older, completed an ACA decision aid exploring their preferences with regard to the underlying attributes of osteoarthritis interventions. We used focus groups to obtain insight into their experiences using this software. RESULTS: Content analysis distributed our participants' concerns into five areas. The predicted preferred treatment usually agreed with the individual's preference, but our participants experienced difficulty in four other domains: the choices presented by the software were sometimes confusing, the treatments presented were not the treatments of most interest, the researchers' claims about treatment characteristics were unpersuasive and cumulative overload sometimes developed. CONCLUSION: Adaptive conjoint analysis presented special challenges to our elderly participants; we believe that their relatively low level of computer comfort was a significant contributor to these problems. We suggest that other researchers choose the software's treatments and present the treatment attributes with care. The next and equally vital step is to educate participants about what to expect, including the limitations in choice and apparent arbitrariness of the trade-offs presented by the software. Providing participants with a sample ACA task before undertaking the study task may further improve participant understanding and engagement.
    Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 09/2012; 17(6). DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00811.x · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To create and validate educational material for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Methods: The design included five phases: (a) a review of the literature regarding surgical complications; (b) gathering information on the needs of patients through blogs and virtual communities; (c) evaluating patient perceptions of the post-operative period through a focus group; (d) obtaining information through specialists using the Delphi technique and validation by judges; and (e) validation by patients in terms of understanding the exhibited material. Results: The first three phases of the study and the first round of the Delphi technique assisted in generating the perioperative patient booklet. The following rounds of the Delphi technique introduced modifications to improve the material, with the judges agreeing on the final material to be validated by patients. Conclusion: Creating a booklet involves more than simply writing summarized ideas on a paper and handing it to the patient. One must understand the population, involve the relevant professionals, and obtain high-quality graphic aids for this type of educational material.
    Asian Nursing Research 12/2012; 6:166-172. DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2012.10.006 · 0.42 Impact Factor
Show more