Article

Strategies for Implementing a Tobacco-Free Campus Policy

Department of Health and Recreation Professions, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, USA.
Journal of American College Health (Impact Factor: 1.45). 11/2011; 59(8):764-8. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2010.529479
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This report examines the rationale for creating a tobacco-free campus to utilize in passing antitobacco policies, and recommendations for overcoming barriers. As with any type of advocacy effort, a variety of impediments exist, including lack of administrative and staff support, absence of student involvement, and sparse resources. A variety of potential remedies and advocacy opportunities are explored and delineated.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Tavis Glassman, Aug 29, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
132 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tobacco-free campuses are a great public health initiative. Healthy People 2020 and Healthy Campus 2020 address tobacco use and young adults including college students. Sources indicate that of the more than 6,000 colleges and universities in the United States, less than 800 are either smoke free or tobacco free. An increasing number of college campus policy makers in the United States are implementing smoke-free or tobacco-free policies, including procedures for violators of these policies. However, without a clearly defined and actionable enforcement component, these policies serve little purpose. This has become a policy enforcement issue that campus leaders should address. Should colleges and universities become tobacco free, if enforcement is not implemented? College and university administrators should demonstrate leadership by having violators of tobacco-free campus policies held to the same standard as those who violate other policies.
    Journal of American College Health 10/2012; 60(7):491-494. DOI:10.1080/07448481.2012.716981 · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One in five college students report tobacco use, thus universities are making strides to reduce tobacco use by adopting smoke- or tobacco-free policies. Describe an innovative ambassador program to increase adherence with a tobacco-free campus policy. The Tobacco-Free Take Action! (TFTA!) Ambassador program was created to form an environment of compliance. Hot spots were targeted by Ambassadors, who were trained to use scripted messages. Ambassadors completed an online documentation form to assess the number of violators observed and approached. The Tobacco-Free Compliance Assessment Tool (TF-CAT) was used to collect pre- and post-cigarette butt data at each hot spot. During the 4-week intervention period, Ambassadors approached 332 violators (529 observed), of which 68% responded positively and complied with the policy. The number of cigarette butts declined by 25%. Adherence with campus tobacco-free policies remains a challenge. Lessons learned from this innovative approach will benefit those currently implementing and planning tobacco-free campus policies.
    03/2013; 5(1):47-56. DOI:10.1002/wmh3.20
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Identify college presidents' support for tobacco-free campus policies (TFCP), perceived barriers and benefits to implementing such policies and activities that might initiate policy adoption. Participants: 405 presidents (51% of 796 delivered surveys) from a national sample of eligible 4-year institutions in summer 2012. Methods: A 4-page, 24-item cross-sectional questionnaire was mailed to potential participants in four waves to maximize the response rate. Results: The vast majority of presidents support TFCP (84%) and believed they should play a key role in establishing TFCP (80%). A majority agreed advocacy by campus groups was necessary to establishing TFCP. Presidents with an existing policy were twice as likely to believe advocacy was necessary for policy establishment. Presidents most commonly selected creating policy drafts and designating a committee as important to initiating TFCP. Conclusion: Advocates would benefit from focusing on presidential involvement and solutions to personnel barriers in establishing TFCP.
    Journal of American College Health 12/2013; 62(3). DOI:10.1080/07448481.2013.877019 · 1.45 Impact Factor
Show more