Reinfected Revised TKA Resolves With an Aggressive Protocol and Antibiotic Infusion

Missouri Bone and Joint Center, St Louis, MO, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.77). 09/2011; 470(1):236-43. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2087-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Revision of failed two-stage revision TKA for infection is challenging, and amputation often is the only alternative.
We asked whether reinfection after two-stage revision for infection could be controlled with an aggressive revision protocol and intraarticular antibiotic infusion.
We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients (12 women, six men) who underwent revision for failed reimplantation between January 1999 and January 2008. Mean time from revision for infection to rerevision for reinfection was 5 months (range, 1-18 months). All knees were treated with an individualized protocol that included aggressive exposure, extensive débridement, uncemented components, closure with muscle flaps (seven knees) and other plastic surgery procedures (three knees), and direct antibiotic infusion through Hickman catheters for 6 weeks. Ten knees had one-stage revision; five had débridement, cement spacer, and revision surgery 3 to 4 months later; and three had extensive soft tissue reconstruction before revision surgery. The minimum followup was 2.3 years (mean, 6.1 years; range, 2.3-12.0 years).
The mean Knee Society scores improved from 33 preoperatively to 76. Seventeen of the 18 had control of infection and achieved durable fixation and a closed wound. One patient had recurrent infection 13 months after one-stage revision, was revised, and remained asymptomatic 28 months postoperatively after redébridement and vancomycin infusion for 6 weeks. In one patient, soft tissue closure was not obtained and the patient required amputation.
Extensile exposure, débridement, and soft tissue flaps for closure combined with uncemented fixation of revision implants and antibiotic infusion into the knee controlled reinfection after revision TKA.

17 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Two-stage revision is the gold standard treatment of TKA infection; nevertheless various factors may influence the success rate. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of the number of patient comorbidities together with virulence of infectious organism on prognosis of two-stage revision procedure in chronic peri-prosthetic knee infection; moreover we tried to demonstrate correlation between the presence of positive culture during re-implantation and re-infection rate. METHODS: Thirty-eight cases of two-staged revision procedures for infected total knee arthroplasty were prospectively followed. The presence of high virulence microorganisms on the culture result and the number (more than three) of comorbidities were used as major risk factors. All cases were divided into three groups: Group 1 (10 patients without major risk factors), Group 2 (18 patients with only one major risk factor), Group 3 (10 patients with both of major risk factors). RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 65months (range 24-139months), there was infection recurrence in nine cases: four re-infections occurred with the same organism while five patients had re-infection with a different organism. Recurrence was higher in Group 3 (33% of the cases), lower in Group 2 (12% of the cases), whereas no infection occurred in Group 1. Finally in case of positive intraoperative cultures recurrence rate was 83%, whereas when specimens were negative we had only 12.5% of re-infections. CONCLUSIONS: Even if standard protocol of two-stage revision has demonstrated good results when treating low-virulence infections or patients without associated risk factors, its application to more challenging condition cannot be assumed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.
    The Knee 07/2012; 20(1). DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.004 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infection after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication with multiple treatment options. Irrigation and debridement with a polyethylene liner exchange can be used for knees with an acute postoperative or acute hematogenous infection however, the literature suggest a failure rate of approximately 50% with some larger and more recent series suggesting success rates that are even lower. For a chronically infected TKA, options include a one-stage or a two-stage exchange with pro’s and con’s to both approaches, however a thorough debridement is key for both techniques. Resection arthroplasty, fusion, and above knee amputation are options for patients with recurrent infection and/or who are not candidates for further attempts at knee reconstruction. Finally, other adjunct treatments, including chronic antibiotic suppression and multiple methods of antibiotic delivery, are described.
    Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 12/2012; 22(4):236-46. DOI:10.1053/j.oto.2012.11.002
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It seems simple to define what a PJI is. The problem is that definitions vary depending on the author involved. It has become accepted that the PJI diagnosis is confirmed when there is purulence around the joint, there is a communication between the skin and the implant, and when causative agent(s) are isolated in multiple samples. In this chapter each of these criteria is discussed in some detail to help in diagnosing PJI as unambiguously as possible.
    infected total joint arthroplasty, first edited by Rihard Trebše, 12/2012: pages 23-30; Springer London., ISBN: 978-1-4471-2481-8
Show more


17 Reads
Available from