Lovely JK, Maxson PM, Jacob AK, et al.. Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery

Hospital Pharmacy Services, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
British Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.54). 01/2012; 99(1):120-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7692
Source: PubMed


Accelerated recovery pathways may reduce length of hospital stay after surgery but there are few data on minimally invasive colorectal operations.
An enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) was instituted, including preoperative analgesia, limited intravenous fluids and opiates, and early feeding. Intrathecal analgesia was administered as needed, but epidural analgesia was not used. The first 66 patients subjected to the ERP were case-matched by surgeon, procedure and age (within 5 years) with patients treated previously in a fast-track pathway (FTP). Short-term and postoperative outcomes to 30 days were compared.
Hospital stay was shorter with the ERP than the FTP: median (interquartile range, i.q.r.) 3 (2-3) versus 3 (3-5) days (P < 0·001). A 2-day hospital stay was achieved in 44 and 8 per cent of patients respectively (P < 0·001). Patients in the ERP had a shorter time to recovery of bowel function: median (i.q.r.) 1 (1-2) versus 2 (2-3) days (P < 0·001). Thirty-day complication rates were similar (32 per cent ERP, 27 per cent FTP; P = 0·570). Readmissions within 30 days were more common with ERP, but the difference was not statistically significant (10 versus 5 patients; P = 0·170). Total hospital stay for those readmitted was shorter in the ERP group (18 versus 23 days).
ERP decreased the length of hospital stay after minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New developments in colorectal surgery have been driven primarily by technical innovations, which in turn are responsible for changes in practice. This review examines recent publications that describe and have contributed to these changes. We identified and reviewed recent publications in the areas of fecal incontinence, constipation, single incision and robotic surgical techniques, complex anal fistulas, diverticulitis, local excision techniques for rectal neoplasms, surgical care improvement, use of mechanical bowel preparation, and magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. New technologies and practice innovations will enhance patient outcomes and quality of life. Multiinstitutional studies, randomized when practical, will be necessary to further define the safety and efficacy of these new surgical techniques and to further define best practices in colon and rectal surgery.
    Current opinion in gastroenterology 10/2010; 27(1):48-53. DOI:10.1097/MOG.0b013e328340b842 · 4.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Standardization of surgical technique helps to reproduce excellent clinical outcomes, especially in teaching institutions. We aim to describe in detail our established approach for oncological right colectomy. The right colon is mobilized in a five-step latero-inferior approach starting off with the terminal ileum, visualizing the duodenum and the head of pancreas. The ascending colon is dissected from the retroperitoneum, and takedown of the hepatic flexure is completed coming retrograde from the transverse colon. Transection of the remaining retroperitoneal attachments completes exposure of the duodenum and mobilization of the right colon. Ileocolic vessels are dissected out and divided close to their origin, and the mesocolon is divided. We then establish intestinal continuity by use of a side-to-side stapled technique. The arms of a linear cutting stapler are inserted via transverse incisions at the anti-mesenteric sides of the terminal ileum and the transverse colon (tenia) and fired. The enterotomy site is closed by removal of the specimen using a second transverse firing of the linear cutting stapler. An important final step is the reinforcement of the anastomotic ends and the crossing of the staple lines; an omental patch and closure of the mesenteric window are optional. The suggested standardized five-step lateral-to-medial dissection of the right colon and the three-step side-to-side stapled technique for ileo-colonic anastomosis are easy to learn and to reproduce. Careful adherence to pivotal technical details will help to obtain an optimal oncological outcome and a consistently low leak rate around 2%.
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 05/2012; 16(8):1605-9. DOI:10.1007/s11605-012-1909-3 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: An increasing body of evidence supports the application of the Enhanced Recovery Programme (ERP) to colorectal surgery. Some institutions have reported an association between ERP failure and low rectal cancer surgery. We present the results that we achieved by applying the ERP to low anterior resections for tumours within 6 cm of the anal verge, with a view to determining the validity and safety of applying the ERP to this patient group. Methods: A multimodal ERP, based on Kehlet's model, was introduced in January 2007 and applied to all patients undergoing elective resections. Patients having a low anterior resection for a rectal cancer less than 6 cm from the anal verge between January 2007 and August 2011 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Individual patient record review was performed. Results: Twenty consecutive patients (12 males) were identified. Median total postoperative length of stay (LOS), including readmission, was 8 days (mean 10.7, range 4-47 days), with 2 readmissions and no deaths. When surgery was uncomplicated, median LOS was 5 days (mean 5.8, range 4-12 days, n = 11), whereas LOS increased when a complication occurred, with a median of 12 days (mean 16.6, range 8-47 days, n = 9) [p = 0.001]. Conclusions: The ERP can safely be applied to this high-risk patient group. When no complication occurs, LOS of 5 days can be expected. When a complication is encountered, LOS is prolonged (12 days), but this is acceptable compared with the current national median LOS in the United Kingdom of 11 days for all rectal cancer surgery (at any height) with a stoma.
    Techniques in Coloproctology 08/2012; 17(1). DOI:10.1007/s10151-012-0886-6 · 2.04 Impact Factor
Show more