Mycophenolate mofetil for steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a phase II Bayesian trial.
ABSTRACT Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a new therapeutic option in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We conducted a phase II Bayesian trial of MMF in children with SDNS. Phase II trials, usually single-arm studies, investigate the effect of new treatments. Standard Fleming's procedure relies on observed results (relapse rate during the trial), whereas Bayesian approach combines observed results with prior information (expected relapse rate according to prior studies and clinical experience). All patients were required to have received prior alkylating-agent treatment. Sixty-seven percent of them had also received levamisole. Patients received MMF (1,200 mg/m(2)/day) and prednisone according to a defined schedule [reduction of alternate-day (e.o.d) dose to 50% of pre-MMF dose at 3 months, 25% at 6 months]. Twenty-four children (median age 6.0 years, 2.8-14.4) entered the study and 23 completed it. Bayesian analysis showed that adding four patients would not change significance of results, allowing stopping inclusions. Four patients relapsed during the first 6 months (estimated probability 17.6%, 95% credibility interval: 5.4-35.0%) and two at months 8 and 11.5. In the 19 patients free of relapse during the first 6 months, median (Q1-Q3) prednisone maintenance dose decreased from 25 (10-44) to 9 (7.5-11.2) mg/m(2) e.o.d (p < 0.001) and cumulative dose from 459 (382-689) to 264 (196-306) mg/m(2)/month (p < 0.001) before and on MMF respectively. Pre-MMF patient characteristics and MMF pharmacokinetics did not differ between patients with or without relapse. MMF reduces relapse rate and steroid dose in children with SDNS and should be proposed before cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide.
- Indian pediatrics 01/2013; 50(1):107-10. · 1.04 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is used as a steroid-sparing agent in pediatric nephrotic syndrome (NS). However, data about its long-term efficacy and safety is limited. METHODS: We report the long-term outcome of MMF therapy in 46 NS patients who remained steroid dependent (SD) despite previous treatment with levamisole and cyclophosphamide. RESULTS: After 1 year of MMF initiation, 32 (70 %) patients had reduced steroid requirement: 12 with decreased threshold dose and 20 were able to stop steroids. At follow-up of mean 3.56 (standard deviation + 1.76) years, 25 (54 %) children required no further alternative immunosuppression (IS), having infrequent or no relapses, of which 14 stopped MMF after a mean 2.4 (standard deviation + 0.9) years; 11 are continuing on MMF for a median of 2.25 years (range 1.33-7.75 years). One patient had a psoriasis flare, and MMF was stopped. No other patient required permanent drug withdrawal due to side effects. The outcome of patients who did not require further alternate IS was significantly better than those who did, with 56 % vs. 10.5 %, respectively, being off regular medications at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that MMF therapy is safe in the long term and allows >50 % of severe SDNS patients to avoid further toxic IS.Pediatric Nephrology 08/2012; · 2.94 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) clinical practice guideline for management of glomerulonephritis was recently released. The Canadian Society of Nephrology convened a working group to review the recommendations and comment on their relevancy and applicability to the Canadian context. A subgroup of pediatric nephrologists reviewed the guideline statements for management of childhood nephrotic syndrome and agreed with most of the guideline statements developed by KDIGO. This commentary highlights areas in which there is lack of evidence and areas in need of translation of evidence into clinical practice. Areas of controversy or uncertainty, including the length of corticosteroid therapy for the initial presentation and relapses, definitions of steroid resistance, and choice of second-line agents, are discussed in more detail. Existing practice variation is also addressed.American Journal of Kidney Diseases 01/2014; · 5.29 Impact Factor