Article

Geophagy during pregnancy in Africa: a literature review.

International Masters in Public Health Program, Hebrew University Braun School of Public Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Obstetrical & gynecological survey (Impact Factor: 2.36). 07/2011; 66(7):452-9. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318232a034
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Geophagy is a form of pica characterized by craving and eating of soil. The main materials ingested include anthill soils and soft stone. In this review, our objectives were to study the prevalence of geophagy in pregnancy (GiP), establish the risk factors for GiP, assess the effects of GiP on pregnancy outcomes, and recommend possible interventions for reducing GiP. PREVALENCE: Geophagy among pregnant women is common in many cultures. In some African countries, GiP prevalence of up to 84% has been observed. In Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, the prevalence of GiP is estimated at 50%. The practice has been associated with religious practice, culture, and famine. RISKS: It is postulated that GiP is due to micronutrient deficiencies, cultural influences, and gastrointestinal upsets. Despite their potential to supply micronutrients, soils interfere with bioavailability of micronutrients leading to micronutrient deficiency and can also act as a pathway for ingestion of geohelminths and heavy metals, putting woman and fetus at risk. GAPS: Despite its association with anemia, pregnancy, and micronutrients, many antenatal care guidelines or National guidelines on micronutrient deficiency control are silent on GiP. The guidelines generally recommend iron supplementation and deworming of pregnant women as anemia control measures. However, not all women seek antenatal services; hence, there is need for more innovative ways of addressing micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy.
It is imperative to enquire whether pregnant women are geophagous and discourage geophagy, strengthen and expand the existing supplementation programs, and mandate flour fortification to enhance population-wide iron supply and safer pregnancies.
Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Family Physicians.
After completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to analyze the prevalence of GiP, identify the risk factors for GiP, and assess the effects of GiP on pregnancy outcomes. In addition to propose remedial interventions for reducing GiP.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Haron Njiru, Apr 19, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
387 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To provide an overview of the current state of knowledge concerning the determinants and consequences of geophagy during pregnancy. Bibliographic searching of articles published in English or French and included in the Scopus database, and reporting of our experience with the management of geophagic pregnant women at the maternity unit of Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni (French Guiana). Geophagy is a little known practice initiated by various stimuli, including nausea and iron deficiency. Sustained geophagy during pregnancy has many consequences, due to complex ionic interactions with the digestive tract. Clay consumption may lead to iron deficiency, which may even be life-threatening in cases of post-partum haemorrhage in severely anaemic women. For the foetus, in addition to the known risk of preterm birth associated with maternal anaemia, maternal geophagy may lead to overexposure to heavy metals, including aluminium in particular. This practice should therefore be considered potentially damaging to the neurological development of the child. The ionic imbalances caused by the ingestion of clay over a long period should be systematically evaluated and corrected, given the secondary malabsorption they may cause, often necessitating parenteral feeding.
    Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 07/2013; 43(7). DOI:10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.06.001 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pica, the deliberate ingestion of non-food substances, has been described in different antenatal populations in some parts of the world. Although the aetiology remains unclear, pica has been associated with complications such as anaemia in pregnancy. Little is known regarding the existence of this phenomenon in a high-risk antenatal population such as women with diabetes in pregnancy.
    The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 08/2013; 13(4):183-186. DOI:10.1177/1474651413500829
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This report summarizes current knowledge about pica practices during pregnancy through a systematic review of the literature for the period 1950 through 1990. Pica behavior was considered in terms of its prevalence, risk factors, clinical profile, and effect on pregnancy outcome. Data on pica practices by pregnant women are limited and inconclusive but reveal several interesting relationships. The prevalence of pica among pregnant women in high-risk groups declined between the 1950s and the 1970s but now remains steady, affecting about one fifth of high-risk women. Women at high risk of pica are more likely to be black, to live in rural areas, and to have a positive childhood and family history of pica. The clinical picture of the disorder during pregnancy is not well described. The evidence suggests that pica during pregnancy results in anemia, but it is not definitive. Pica also has been associated with maternal and perinatal mortality. We conclude that the behavior is more prevalent than commonly believed, shows no sign of further decline, and may have serious effects, particularly anemia, on mother and infant. Dietetic practitioners who counsel pregnant women should ask questions about pica when they conduct nutrition assessments of their clients.
    Journal of the American Dietetic Association 02/1991; 91(1):34-8. · 3.92 Impact Factor