Article

Prediction of tumour necrosis fractions using metabolic and volumetric 18F-FDG PET/CT indices, after one course and at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in children and young adults with osteosarcoma.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.53). 09/2011; 39(1):39-49. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-011-1936-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The utility of combined metabolic and volumetric (18)F-FDG PET/CT indices for predicting tumour necrosis fractions following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been extensively studied in osteosarcoma. Furthermore, little is known of the early PET/CT responses after only one chemotherapy course.
Enrolled in the study were 20 children and young adults with resectable osteosarcoma who had undergone (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Maximum standardized uptake value (mSUV), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured. From among the 20 patients, 14 were prospectively recruited and underwent an additional PET/CT scan after one chemotherapy course. Histopathological necrosis fractions were compared with the above-mentioned PET/CT indices and their ratios.
MTV at the SUV threshold of 2 g/ml was closely correlated with the magnetic resonance image volumes before therapy (r = 0.91). In the prospective cohort, five patients were classified as good responders and nine as poor responders. All the metabolic indices (mSUV and its ratio) and combined metabolic/volumetric indices (MTV, TLG, and their ratios) except the mSUV ratio determined after therapy showed significant differences between good and poor responders (P <0.05). Differences were also noted for all of these indices determined after one chemotherapy course. Furthermore, most of these indices determined after therapy as well as after one chemotherapy course had good sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with respect to predicting histological response to chemotherapy.
In our osteosarcoma patient population, (18)F-FDG PET/CT indices (either combined metabolic/volumetric or metabolic indices) determined after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were useful in predicting tumour responses. This held true after only one chemotherapy course.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
99 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary osseous malignancy excluding malignant neoplasms of marrow origin (myeloma, lymphoma and leukemia) and accounts for approximately 20% of bone cancers. It predominantly affects patients younger than 20 years and mainly occurs in the long bones of the extremities, the most common being the metaphyseal area around the knee. These are classified as primary (central or surface) and secondary osteosarcomas arising in preexisting conditions. The conventional plain radiograph is the best for probable diagnosis as it describes features like sun burst appearance, Codman's triangle, new bone formation in soft tissues along with permeative pattern of destruction of the bone and other characteristics for specific subtypes of osteosarcomas. X-ray chest can detect metastasis in the lungs, but computerized tomography (CT) scan of the thorax is more helpful. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lesion delineates its extent into the soft tissues, the medullary canal, the joint, skip lesions and the proximity of the tumor to the neurovascular structures. Tc99 bone scan detects the osseous metastases. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is used for metastatic workup and/or local recurrence after resection. The role of biochemical markers like alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase is pertinent for prognosis and treatment response. The biopsy confirms the diagnosis and reveals the grade of the tumor. Enneking system for staging malignant musculoskeletal tumors and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems are most commonly used for extremity sarcomas.
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 05/2014; 48(3):238-46. · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective According to the current treatment protocol of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study, it is mandatory to determine the histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment before surgical removal of the tumor, particularly if a limb salvage procedure is planned. The aim of this systematic, retrospective study was to evaluate the ability of 2-(18F) fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to predict chemotherapy response of osteosarcoma and to identify a simple promising method for noninvasive evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma.Methods The PubMed database was searched to identify and analyze relevant published reports. In particular, correlations between tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), standard uptake value (SUV) and histological response to chemotherapy were assessed.ResultsIt was found that good responses are achieved in patients with TBR after chemotherapy (TBR2)/TBR before chemotherapy (TBR1) < 0.470 (positive predictive value [PPV] = 92.31%, negative predictive value [NPV] = 82.76%, sensitivity [S] = 87.80%, specificity [SP] = 88.89%), whereas poor responses occur in patients with SUV after chemotherapy/before chemotherapy (SUV2/SUV1) > 0.396 (PPV = 73.68%, NPV = 73.33%, S = 63.64%, SP = 81.48%).Conclusion Changes in TBR are better predictors of chemotherapy response than SUV in osteosarcoma patients. Therefore, we believe that choice of surgical strategy is optimally based on changes in TBR.
    Orthopaedic Surgery 05/2014; 6(2).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE. Numerous primary bone tumors are encountered on (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and many are FDG avid. The degree of FDG uptake in bone tumors does not necessarily reflect malignant potential. In conjunction with radiographs, evaluation of morphologic characteristics on the CT portion of PET/CT scans is important for characterization of the lesions. FDG PET/CT has been found to be useful for staging and has also been found to reflect prognosis in some primary bone malignancies. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with topics regarding FDG PET/CT and both malignant and benign primary bone tumors. CONCLUSION. FDG uptake alone is not adequate for characterizing primary bone tumors, and morphologic evaluation is an important factor in the interpretation of PET/CT scans. After diagnosis, FDG avidity and morphologic features can play an important role in staging and determining response to therapy. On completion of this article, readers should have an improved ability to evaluate the FDG uptake and CT morphologic features of malignant and benign primary bone tumors. Readers should also have a better understanding of the potential role of FDG PET/CT in the management of patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.
    AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 06/2014; 202(6):W521-31.

Full-text

Download
5 Downloads
Available from
Aug 21, 2014