Article

Heat shock protein 90 regulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase family proteins together with the RUVBL1/2 and Tel2-containing co-factor complex

Department of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Cancer Science (Impact Factor: 3.53). 09/2011; 103(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02112.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), a conserved molecular chaperone for a specific set of proteins critical for signal transduction including several oncogenic proteins, has been recognized as a promising target for anticancer therapy. Hsp90 inhibition also sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damage. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Here, we provide evidence that Hsp90 is a general regulator of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase (PIKK) family proteins, central regulators of stress responses including DNA damage. Inhibition of Hsp90 causes a reduction of all PIKK and suppresses PIKK-mediated signaling. In addition, Hsp90 forms complexes with RUVBL1/2 complex and Tel2 complex, both of which have been shown to interact with all PIKK and control their abundance and functions. These results suggest that Hsp90 can form multiple complexes with the RUVBL1/2 complex and Tel2 complex and function in the regulation of PIKK, providing additional rationale for the effectiveness of Hsp90 inhibition for anticancer therapy, including sensitization to DNA damage.

0 Followers
 · 
151 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload high-quality image (336 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is the best-characterized mRNA surveillance mechanism that degrades a premature-termination codon (PTC)-containing mRNA. During mammalian NMD, SMG1 and UPF1, key proteins in NMD, join at a PTC and form an SMG1-UPF1-eRF1-eRF3 (SURF) complex by binding UPF1 to eRF3 after PTC-recognition by the translating ribosome. Subsequently, UPF1 is phosphorylated after UPF1-SMG1 moves onto the downstream exon junction complex (EJC). However, the cellular events that induce UPF1 and SMG1 complex formation and increase NMD efficiency before PTC recognition remain unclear. Here, we show that telomere-maintenance 2 (TEL2) phosphorylation by casein-kinase 2 (CK2) increases SMG1 stability, which increases UPF1 phosphorylation and, ultimately, augments NMD. Inhibition of CK2 activity or downregulation of TEL2 impairs NMD. Intriguingly, loss of TEL2 phosphorylation reduces UPF1-bound PTC-containing mRNA and the formation of the SMG1-UPF1 complex. Thus, our results identify a new function of CK2-mediated TEL2 phosphorylation in a mammalian NMD.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 07/2013; 1829(10). DOI:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.06.002 · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SMG-1, a member of the PIKK (phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinase) family, plays a critical role in the mRNA quality control system known as nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). NMD protects cells from the accumulation of aberrant mRNAs with premature termination codons (PTCs) which encode nonfunctional or potentially harmful truncated proteins. SMG-1 directly phosphorylates Upf1 helicase, another key component of NMD, upon recognition of PTC on postspliced mRNA during the initial round of translation. Phosphorylated-Upf1 recruits the SMG-5/SMG-7 complex to induce ribosome dissociation and decapping-mediated decay. Phospho-Upf1 also recruits the SMG-6 endonuclease which might be involved in endo-cleavage. Upf1 ATPase/helicase activities are likely required for the activation of other mRNA decay enzymes and the mRNA-protein complex dissociation to complete NMD. At present, a variety of tools are available that can specifically suppress NMD, and it has become possible to examine the contribution of NMD in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions.
    Genes to Cells 01/2013; 18(3). DOI:10.1111/gtc.12033 · 2.86 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads