Article
Evaluation of methods for sampling the malaria vector Anopheles darlingi (Diptera, Culicidae) in Suriname and the relation with its biting behavior.
Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8031, 6700 EH, The Netherlands.
Journal of Medical Entomology (impact factor:
1.76).
09/2011;
48(5):1039-46.
pp.1039-46
Source: PubMed
-
Article: Biting pattern and host-seeking behavior of Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern South Africa.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Biting rhythm as well as vertical and horizontal distribution of host-seeking Anopheles arabiensis Patton was studied at a remote warm-water spring in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, which usually is devoid of human presence. An. arabiensis seeking hosts were collected throughout the night with several peaks, often with greatest biting activity during the predawn period. Abundance did not decline linearly as a function of distance from the breeding area, but was related to vegetation patterns. Most bites occurred on the ankles or feet and decreased rapidly above that height. Wearing closed shoes or raising feet off the ground could reduce vector contact and therefore the risk of malaria infection.Journal of Medical Entomology 06/1994; 31(3):333-9. · 1.76 Impact Factor -
Article: Incubated Human Sweat but not Fresh Sweat Attracts the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A dual-port olfactometer was used to quantify behavioral responses of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto to volatiles emitted by sweat samples collected from three human volunteers. Significant attraction (P < 0.05)="" was="" found="" to="" sweat="" of="" two="" volunteers="" after="" two="" days="" and="" to="" one="" of="" the="" volunteers'="" sweat="" after="" one="" day="" of="" incubation="" at="" 37c.="" there="" was="" no="" attraction="" to="" any="" of="" the="" fresh="" sweat="" samples.="" the="" ph="" of="" the="" sweat="" that="" became="" attractive="" after="" one="" or="" two="" days="" had="" changed="" from="" acidic="" (5.5–5.75)="" to="" alkaline="" (8.25–8.75),="" while="" the="" ph="" of="" the="" sweat="" of="" the="" third="" volunteer="" (ph="" 7)="" did="" not="" change="" during="" incubation.="" microorganisms,="" present="" in="" all="" fresh="" sweat="" samples,="" showed="" distinct="" growth="" during="" incubation.="" the="" concentration="" of="" lactic="" acid="" decreased="" an="" average="" of="" 23%="" in="" two="" days="" of="" incubation.="" the="" role="" of="" the="" ph,="" skin="" microflora,="" and="" lactic="" acid="" in="" the="" differential="" attractiveness="" of="" human="" sweat="" samples="" is="">Journal of Chemical Ecology 02/1999; 25(3):663-672. · 2.66 Impact Factor -
Article: Light, carbon dioxide, and octenol-baited mosquito trap and host-seeking activity evaluations for mosquitoes in a malarious area of the Republic of Korea.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two field trials for commercially available and experimental mosquito traps variously baited with light, carbon dioxide, octenol, or combinations of these were evaluated in a malarious area at Paekyeon-Ri near Tongil-Chon (village) and Camp Greaves, Paju County, Kyonggi Province, Republic of Korea. The host-seeking activity for common mosquito species was determined using hourly aspirator collections from a human- and propane lantern-baited Shannon trap. The total number of mosquitoes and number of each species captured during the test were compared using 8 x 8 and 5 x 5 Latin square designs based on trap location. Significant differences were observed for the total number of mosquitoes collected in the 8 x 8 test, such that counterflow geometry (CFG) with CO2 > or = CFG with CO2 and octenol > or = Shannon trap > or = Mosquito Magnet with octenol > American Biophysics Corporation (ABC) light trap with light, CO2 (500 ml/min), and octenol > or = ABC light trap with light and dry ice > or = ABC light trap with light and CO2 > ABC light trap with light only. A concurrent 5 x 5 test found significant differences in trap catch, where Mosquito Magnet with octenol > New Jersey light trap > or = EPAR Mosquito Killer with CO2 > or = ABC light trap with light and dry ice > Centers for Disease Control (CDC) light trap (manufactured by John W. Hock) with light and octenol. Significant differences in trap catch were noted for several species including: Aedes vexans, Anopheles sinensis, An. yatsushiroensis, An. lesteri, Culex pipiens, and Cx. orientalis. Traps baited with octenol captured significantly fewer Cx. pipiens than those not baited with octenol. Likewise, no Cx. orientalis were captured in octenol-baited traps. Host-seeking activity showed a similar bimodal pattern for all species captured. Results from these field trap evaluations can significantly enhance surveillance efforts. Significantly greater numbers of mosquitoes were captured with mosquito traps using counterflow technology (e.g., Mosquito Magnet and CFG traps) when compared to standard light and carbon dioxide-baited traps. Additionally, field evaluations demonstrate that various traps can be utilized for isolation and detection of arboviruses and other pathogens.Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 09/2001; 17(3):196-205. · 0.91 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
alternative sampling tools
Anopheles darlingi Root
BG Sentinel mosquito trap
CO2 bait
Higher efficiency
host-specific volatiles
human baits
human landing collections
human odor
human-baited mosquito traps
lower legs
mosquito
Mosquito Magnet Liberty
mosquito species
mosquito trap
odor bait
odor-baited sampling systems
Prevention Miniature Light trap
seated human host
trapping data