Article

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor is Associated With Progressive Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis C Infection

Medical Department III, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Journal of clinical gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 3.19). 09/2011; 46(4):334-8. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822da19d
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Progressive liver fibrosis is the main predictor of disease outcome in chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. Although the importance of the coagulation cascade has been suggested in liver fibrogenesis, the role of the fibrinolytic pathway is yet unclear.
We evaluated the association of serum levels of the fibrinolysis-associated soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) with the severity of liver fibrosis in HCV infection.
suPAR serum levels were assessed in 146 chronically HCV-infected patients of 2 independent cohorts (64 subjects in the screening cohort, 82 in the validation cohort) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated with biopsy-proven histologic stage of liver fibrosis and noninvasive liver fibrosis markers (aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index score, transient elastography).
suPAR serum levels were strongly associated with the histologic stage of liver fibrosis in both cohorts (P<0.0001). Although mean suPAR levels in patients with F1 and F2 fibrosis were not different from healthy control subjects, they were significantly increased at higher stages of liver fibrosis (F3 and F4, P<0.0001). suPAR values had a high diagnostic specificity and sensitivity to differentiate mild/moderate fibrosis (F1/F2) from severe fibrosis (F3/F4) with an area under curve of 0.774 (P=0.0001) and for the differentiation of noncirrhosis from cirrhosis (F1/F2/F3 vs. F4, area under curve 0.791, P=0.0001). SuPAR serum levels were also strongly correlated to the noninvasive fibrosis markers aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index score (r=0.52) and transient elastography (r=0.44, both P<0.0001).
Serum suPAR levels were robust markers of liver fibrosis in 2 cohorts with a comparable diagnostic accuracy for prediction of severe liver fibrosis as established noninvasive marker.

0 Followers
 · 
147 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a GPI anchored cell surface protein that is closely associated with invasion, migration, and metastasis of cancer cells. Many functional extracellular proteins and transmembrane receptors interact with uPAR. However, few studies have examined the association of uPAR with cytoplasm proteins. We previously used yeast two-hybrid screening to isolate several novel uPAR-interacting cytoplasmic proteins, including Sprouty1 (SPRY1), an inhibitor of the (Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase) MAPK pathway. In this study, we show that SPRY1 interacts with uPAR and directs it toward lysosomal-mediated degradation. Overexpression of SPRY1 decreased the cell surface and cytoplasmic uPAR protein level. Moreover, SPRY1 overexpression augmented uPAR-induced cell adhesion to vitronectin as well as proliferation of cancer cells. Our results also further support the critical role of SPRY1 contribution to tumor growth. In a subcutaneous tumor model, overexpression of SPRY1 in HCT116 or A549 xenograft in athymic nude mice led to great suppression of tumor growth. These results show that SPRY1 may affect tumor cell function through direct interaction with uPAR and promote its lysosomal degradation.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background & AimEarly detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before imaging signs appear remains an unmet medical need. Former publications suggest that soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a non-specific cancer marker. suPAR was validated for the detection of patients at risk for HCC.Methods After an initial training set in 23 patients with extreme disease phenotypes, a prospective test set was conducted in which 267 patients without any imaging signs of HCC were followed-up for seven years. Patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk for the development of HCC by the EASL criteria. suPAR was measured at the beginning of follow-up. All patients underwent liver biopsy to define staging of fibrosis. The primary study endpoint was to define a cut-off among high-risk patients by the EASL criteria that can early discriminate those at real risk for HCC.ResultsThe training set showed that suPAR was significantly greater in patients with HCC even in the absence of underlying cirrhosis compared with patients with minimal liver inflammation due to fatty deposition. The test set showed that among the high-risk EASL subgroup, suPAR more than 9.56ng/ml had sensitivity 76.0%, specificity 90.4%, positive predictive value 54.3% and negative predictive value 96.2% for the development of HCC (odds ratio: 29.88, p< 0.0001). In survival analysis, patients with suPAR above 9.56 ng/ml at baseline progressed earlier to HCC.Conclusions The specificity and negative predictive value make serum suPAR a potential screening tool for the early detection of HCC in patients with chronic liver disorders.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Liver international: official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 10/2014; 35(2). DOI:10.1111/liv.12705 · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For decades tumors have been recognized as "wounds that do not heal." Besides the commonalities that tumors and wounded tissues share, the process of wound healing also portrays similar characteristics with chronic fibrosis. In this review, we suggest a tight interrelationship, which is governed as a concurrence of cellular and microenvironmental reactivity among wound healing, chronic fibrosis and cancer development/progression (i.e., the WHFC triad). It is clear that the same cell types, as well as soluble and matrix elements that drive wound healing (including regeneration) via distinct signaling pathways, also fuel chronic fibrosis and tumor progression. Hence, here we review the relationship between fibrosis and cancer through the lens of wound healing.
    Physiological Genomics 02/2014; 46(7). DOI:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00158.2013 · 2.81 Impact Factor