Postoperative Complications After Gynecologic Surgery

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 5.18). 10/2011; 118(4):785-93. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822dac5d
Source: PubMed


To estimate the association of age, medical comorbidities, functional status, and unintentional weight loss (as a marker of frailty) with postoperative complications in women undergoing major gynecologic surgery.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2009 participant use data files to analyze gynecologic procedures. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day major postoperative complications.
A total of 22,214 women were included in our final analysis. The overall prevalence of composite 30-day major postoperative complications was 3.7% (n=817). Age 80 years or older (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.58), dependent functional status (adjusted OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.53-3.68), and unintentional weight loss (adjusted OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.48-4.17) were significantly associated with postoperative morbidity after adjusting for diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.79), known bleeding disorder (adjusted OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.49-3.52), morbid obesity (adjusted OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.45-2.17), ascites (adjusted OR 3.27, 95% CI 2.18-4.90), preoperative systemic infection (adjusted OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.03-4.48), procedures for gynecologic cancer (adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.27-2.0), disseminated cancer (adjusted OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.64-4.03), emergency procedures (adjusted OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.18-2.79), operative time more than 4 hours compared with less than 1 hour (adjusted OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.18-3.89), and wound class 4 compared with wound class 1 (adjusted OR 4.28, 95% CI 1.82-10.1).
Age 80 years or older, medical comorbidities, dependent functional status, and unintentional weight loss are associated with increased major postoperative complications after gynecologic procedures.

28 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to create a clinical prediction tool to differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery. We utilized the 2005 to 2009 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant use data files to perform a secondary data-set analysis of women older than 16 years who underwent benign gynecologic procedures. We then temporally divided women into 2 similar cohorts. Our derivation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2005 to 2008. Our validation cohort included all women undergoing benign gynecologic procedures in 2009. The primary outcome, composite 30-day major postoperative complications, was analyzed as a dichotomous variable. A prediction tool was then constructed to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications built from the logistic regression model by rounding the value of each estimated β coefficient to the nearest integer. An individual's risk score was then computed by summing the number of points based on her preoperative characteristics. This risk score was then used to categorize women into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. A prediction tool for benign gynecologic procedures identified women at low (2.7% and 2.4%), medium (6.3% and 6.8%), and high (29.5% and 23.8%) risk of complications in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. A prediction tool can differentiate women at risk for postoperative complications after benign gynecologic surgery.
    Journal of Pelvic Medicine and Surgery 09/2012; 18(5):274-80. DOI:10.1097/SPV.0b013e318263a210 · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on several outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy, in particular in the extremes of obesity. Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital. Eight hundred thirty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from January 2007 to October 2011. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was a composite index score that took into account operative time, nonsurgical operating room time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, number of complications, and severity of complications according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. We individually examined elements of the composite index as a secondary outcome. Models were developed to assess the association of BMI with the composite index score and the components of the index, controlling for age, presence of diabetes, tobacco use, surgeon, type of hysterectomy (total vs supracervical), use of robotics, uterine weight, number of additional procedures performed, presence of adhesions requiring lysis, and deeply infiltrating endometriosis as potential confounders. Mean (SD) BMI was 31.4 (8.1). Mean (SD) uterine weight was 345 (388) g. Mean operative time was 150 (61) minutes. Increasing BMI was associated with a worse composite score (p < .01); longer operative time (p = .03), nonsurgical operating room time (p = .02), and total operating room time (p < .01); greater estimated blood loss (p < .01); and complication severity (p = .01). These data suggest that there is a significant association of BMI with surgical outcomes in laparoscopic hysterectomy, and the effect is most pronounced in the morbidly obese. These patients may stand to gain the greatest differential benefit from a laparoscopic approach to surgery. However, they should be properly counseled about the challenge that obesity poses to the operation.
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 11/2012; 19(6):701-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.07.005 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review perioperative care in gynecologic oncology with special emphasis on areas of controversy. Major gynecologic surgery still represents the cornerstone of management among women diagnosed with gynecologic malignancies. The implementation of clinical guidelines can significantly impact perioperative morbidity and mortality. Preoperative evaluation and preparation allows the surgeon to identify patient risks and develop risk factor modification strategies decreasing delays in preparation and cost and improving patient safety. Preoperative areas of controversy include preoperative testing and evaluation, use of mechanical bowel preparation, prophylactic antibiotics, and use of anticoagulants, and the timing of postoperative feeding. In healthy women undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery preoperative evaluation requirements will be minimal. For women with extensive comorbid conditions a more detailed evaluation will be required to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Mechanical bowel preparations should not be required preoperatively. Preoperative administration of antibiotics and anticoagulants should be provided to all patients undergoing major gynecologic cancer surgery.
    Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 02/2013; 25(1):23-8. DOI:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835b80f5 · 2.07 Impact Factor
Show more


28 Reads
Available from