Article

Children's Depression Screener (ChilD-S): development and validation of a depression screening instrument for children in pediatric care.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Child Psychiatry and Human Development (Impact Factor: 1.93). 09/2011; 43(1):137-51. DOI: 10.1007/s10578-011-0254-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Children's Depression Screener (ChilD-S) for use in pediatric care. In two pediatric samples, children aged 9-12 (N(I) = 200; N(II) = 246) completed an explorative item pool (subsample I) and a revised item pool (subsample II). Diagnostic accuracy of each of the 22 items from the revised pool was evaluated in order to select the best items for the brief instrument ChilD-S. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of the revised item pool and the ChilD-S were compared. A diagnostic interview, the Kinder-DIPS, served as gold standard. For the purpose of screening for depressive disorders in children, the eight-item ChilD-S (AUC = 0.97) performed just as well as the revised 22-item pool (AUC = 0.94). For the ChilD-S the optimal cut-off point of ≥11 yielded a sensitivity of 0.91 and a specificity of 0.89. The ChilD-S shows high potential for depression screening of children in pediatric care.

1 Bookmark
 · 
244 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We compared the concurrent validity of several tests for screening depression in pediatric care with respect to ICD-10 depression diagnoses in medically ill children: the German version of the Children's Depression Inventory (Depressionsinventar für Kinder und Jugendliche, DIKJ), the scale Dysphoria of the Depression Test for Children (Depressionstest für Kinder, DTK), and the Children's Depression Screener (ChilD-S). Data of 9- to 12-year-old patients (N = 228) were analyzed with receiver operating characteristics. Validity measures like area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP) were calculated for each instrument and subsequently compared. ICD-10 depression diagnoses according to a structured clinical interview served as the gold standard. The concurrent validity was high for the 26-item DIKJ (AUC = 92.6 %), satisfactory for the 25-item scale Dysphoria (AUC = 86.2 %), and very high for the 8-item ChilD-S (AUC = 97.5 %); the ChilD-S was significantly superior to the DIKJ. According to the Youden-Index the following cutoff scores are recommended: DIKJ ≥ 12 (SE = 91.7 %, SP = 81.9 %), scale Dysphoria ≥ 10 (SE = 75.0 %, SP = 89.8 %) and ChilD-S ≥ 10 (SE = 100 %, SP = 86.6 %). DIKJ and ChilD-S showed excellent concurrent validity for depression screening in pediatric patients, while the scale Dysphoria achieved lower values. For implementation in time-limited pediatric settings, the economic ChilD-S is the preferred instrument.
    Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie 05/2012; 40(3):161-9. · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diagnosing childhood depression can pose a challenge, even for mental health specialists. Screening tools can aid clinicians within the initial step of the diagnostic process. For the first time, the Children׳s Depression Screener (ChilD-S) is validated in a mental health setting as a novel field of application beyond the previously examined pediatric setting. Based on a structured interview, DSM-IV-TR diagnoses of depression were made for 79 psychiatric patients aged 9-12, serving as the gold standard for validation. For assessing criterion validity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. Point prevalence of major depression and dysthymia was 28%. Diagnostic accuracy in terms of the area under the ROC curve was high (0.97). At the optimal cut-off point ≥12 according to the Youden׳s index, sensitivity was 0.91 and specificity was 0.81. The findings suggest that the ChilD-S is not only a valid screening instrument for childhood depression in pediatric care but also in mental health settings. As a brief tool it can easily be implemented into daily clinical practice of mental health professionals facilitating the diagnostic process, especially in case of comorbid depression.
    Psychiatry research. 04/2014;

Full-text (4 Sources)

Download
1,056 Downloads
Available from
May 17, 2014