The Effect of Neuraxial Versus General Anesthesia Techniques on Postoperative Quality of Recovery and Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Department of Anesthesiology, Santo Antonio Hospital, Bahia, Brazil. Anesthesia and analgesia
(Impact Factor: 3.47).
09/2011; 113(6):1480-6. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182334d8b
Patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy often have significant postoperative pain despite the use of concurrent multimodal pain strategies. Neuraxial anesthesia has opioid-sparing effects and may provide better postoperative recovery to patients when compared with general anesthesia. Our main objective in this study was to compare the effects of neuraxial and general anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery after abdominal hysterectomy.
The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Seventy healthy females were recruited and randomized to a general anesthesia or neuraxial technique as their primary anesthetic regimen. The primary outcome was the global quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) at 24 hours after the surgical procedure. Other data collected included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, and linear regression. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The median difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the global QoR-40 score at 24 hours between the neuraxial and general anesthesia groups was 17 (11 to 21.5) (P < 0.001). Patients in the neuraxial anesthesia group had better quality of recovery scores in all the QoR-40 subcomponents than did the general anesthesia group (all P < 0.005). The median difference in global QoR-40 scores at 48 hours between the neuraxial anesthesia and the general anesthesia groups was 8 (6-10) (P < 0.001). Postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were higher in the general anesthesia group than in the neuraxial anesthesia group. There was an inverse linear relationship between opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery at 24 hours, r(2) = 0.67 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI of 0.77 to 0.51), and at 48 hours, r(2) = 0.58 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI of 0.72 to 0.42).
Neuraxial anesthesia provides better quality of recovery than does general anesthesia for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. The opioid-sparing effects of neuraxial anesthesia were associated with a better quality of recovery in patients after the surgical procedure. In the absence of contraindications, neuraxial anesthesia seems to be a better anesthetic plan for those patients.
Available from: Roxana Hagioglu Ciobotaru
- "Prior to an abdominal hysterectomy , the patient undergoes a regional or general anaesthesia. In the absence of contraindications, neuraxial anaesthesia provides a better quality of recovery than general anaesthesia. Minimizing the intensity of such pain maintains normal biological parameters, physical functioning and mental well-being. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Opioids are the drugs of choice for medium and high-intensity postoperative pain. Morphine is considered to be the most effective, but it can also lead to an increased risk of allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock. A retrospective study was conducted, where postoperative positive intradermal skin tests to morphine of 90 patients with total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were analysed. Patients were categorized in terms of the type of anaesthesia, diet, sugar diet and the amount of alcohol consumed. It was found that the type of anaesthesia significantly influences the frequency of positive intradermal skin test to morphine, which is most common in patients with general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation (67% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). There is a correlation between the type of anaesthesia and allergy to morphine, but not a very strong one. Diet and alcohol consumed had moderate influence on the frequency of positive intradermal skin test to morphine. There was no correlation observed between sugar consumption and allergy to morphine.
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 06/2015; 29(5):1-7. DOI:10.1080/13102818.2015.1047405 · 0.30 Impact Factor
Pain 06/2012; 153(9):1974. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.023 · 5.21 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Hip fracture in geriatric patients has a substantial economic impact and represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. At our institution, a regional anesthesia program was instituted for patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. This retrospective cohort review examines the effects of regional anesthesia (from mainly after July 2007) vs general anesthesia (mainly prior to July 2007) on morbidity, mortality and hospitalization costs.
This retrospective cohort study involved data collection from electronic and paper charts of 308 patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture from September 2006 to December 2008. Data on postoperative morbidity, in-patient mortality, and cost of hospitalization (as estimated from data on hospital charges) were collected and analyzed. Seventy-three patients received regional anesthesia and 235 patients received general anesthesia. During July 2007, approximately halfway through the study period, a regional anesthesia and analgesia program was introduced.
The average cost of hospitalization in patients who received surgery for hip fracture was no different between patients who receive regional or general anesthesia ($16,789 + 631 vs $16,815 + 643, respectively, P = 0.9557). Delay in surgery and intensive care unit (ICU) admission resulted in significantly higher hospitalization costs. Age, male gender, African American race and ICU admission were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality and rates of readmission are not statistically different between the two anesthesia groups.
There is no difference in postoperative morbidity, rates of rehospitalization, in-patient mortality or hospitalization costs in geriatric patients undergoing regional or general anesthesia for repair of hip fracture. Delay in surgery beyond 3 days and ICU admission both increase cost of hospitalization.
Pain Medicine 07/2012; 13(7):948-56. DOI:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01402.x · 2.30 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.