Article
Impact of aetiological treatment on conventional and multiplex serology in chronic Chagas disease.
Chagas Disease and Heart Failure Section, Cardiology Department, Hospital Eva Perón, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases (impact factor:
4.69).
09/2011;
5(9):e1314.
DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001314
pp.e1314
Source: PubMed
- Citations (35)
-
Cited In (0)
-
Article: Treatment of chronic Chagas' disease with benznidazole: clinical and serologic evolution of patients with long-term follow-up.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Prescribing etiologic treatment for chronic Chagas' disease is highly controversial because of the difficulties involved in assessing its therapeutic efficacy--the low degree of parasitemia, the persistence of positive immunologic reactions, the lack of clinical findings to support each type of treatment, and the necessarily prolonged follow-up of the patient. An 8-year average follow-up was performed on 131 patients treated with benznidazole (5 mg/kg/day for 30 days) (TP) and 70 untreated patients (UTP) by serial electrocardiograms and analysis of the cardiomyopathic progress of the clinical groups, and by immunologic tests at both the beginning and end of the study. TPs presented less electrocardiographic changes during the follow-up period (4.2% vs 30%) and a lower frequency of deterioration in their clinical condition (2.1% vs 17%). The percentage of TPs who were serologically negative was 19.1% whereas 6% of the UTPs became serologically negative, a result that correlated with a lack of progress in the cardiomyopathy. Benznidazole treatment significantly decreased serologic titers, signifying parasitologic cure in two patients.American Heart Journal 02/1994; 127(1):151-62. · 4.65 Impact Factor -
Article: Long-term cardiac outcomes of treating chronic Chagas disease with benznidazole versus no treatment: a nonrandomized trial.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Benznidazole is effective for treating acute-stage Chagas disease, but its effectiveness for treating indeterminate and chronic stages remains uncertain. To compare long-term outcomes of patients with nonacute Chagas disease treated with benznidazole versus outcomes of those who did not receive treatment. Clinical trial with unblinded, nonrandom assignment of patients to intervention or control groups. Chagas disease center in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 566 patients 30 to 50 years of age with 3 positive results on serologic tests and without heart failure. The primary outcome was disease progression, defined as a change to a more advanced Kuschnir group or death. Secondary outcomes included new abnormalities on electrocardiography and serologic reactivity. Oral benznidazole, 5 mg/kg of body weight per day for 30 days (283 patients), or no treatment (283 patients). Fewer treated patients had progression of disease (12 of 283 [4%] vs. 40 of 283 [14%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.59]; P = 0.002) or developed abnormalities on electrocardiography (15 of 283 [5%] vs. 45 of 283 [16%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.27 [CI, 0.13 to 0.57]; P = 0.001) compared with untreated patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.97 [CI, 0.94 to 0.99]; P < 0.002) and left ventricular diastolic diameter (hazard ratio, 2.45 [CI, 1.53 to 3.95]; P < 0.001) were also associated with disease progression. Conversion to negative results on serologic testing was more frequent in treated patients than in untreated patients (32 of 218 [15%] vs. 12 of 212 [6%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.1 [CI, 1.06 to 4.06]; P = 0.034). Nonrandom, unblinded treatment assignment was used, and follow-up data were missing for 20% of patients. Loss to follow-up was more common among patients who were less sick. Two uncontrolled interim analyses were conducted. Compared with no treatment, benznidazole treatment was associated with reduced progression of Chagas disease and increased negative seroconversion for patients presenting with nonacute disease and no heart failure. These observations indicate that a randomized, controlled trial should now be conducted.Annals of internal medicine 05/2006; 144(10):724-34. · 16.73 Impact Factor -
Article: Trypanocide treatment among adults with chronic Chagas disease living in Santa Fe city (Argentina), over a mean follow-up of 21 years: parasitological, serological and clinical evolution.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficacy of treatment with nifurtimox and/or benznidazole among adults with chronic Chagas disease with no previous electrocardiographic disturbances was evaluated over a mean follow-up of 21 years, by means of conventional serology, xenodiagnosis, clinical examination, electrocardiograms and chest X-ray. One hundred and eleven patients, between 17 and 46 years old, were studied: 54 underwent treatment (nifurtimox 27, benznidazole 27) and 57 remained untreated (control group). Xenodiagnosis was performed on 65% of them: 36/38 of the treated and 9/34 of the untreated patients had previous positive xenodiagnosis. Post-treatment, 133 xenodiagnoses were performed on 41 patients, all resulting negative. In the control group, 29 xenodiagnoses were performed on 14 patients; 2 resulted positive. Sera stored during the follow-up were simultaneously analyzed through conventional serology tests (IHA; DA-2ME; IIF). The serological evolution in the treated group was: a) 37% underwent negative seroconversion (nifurtimox 11, benznidazole 9); b) 27.8% decreased titers (nifurtimox 9, benznidazole 6), 9 showed inconclusive final serology (nifurtimox 7, benznidazole 2); c) 35.2% remained positive with constant titers (nifurtimox 7; benznidazole 12). The control group conserved the initial antibody levels during the follow-up. In the clinical evolution, 2/54 (3.7%) of the treated and 9/57 (15.8%) of the untreated patients showed electrocardiographic disturbances attributable to Chagas myocardiopathy, with a statistically relevant difference (p<0.05). Treatment caused deparasitation in at least 37% of the chronically infected adults and a protective effect on their clinical evolution.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 40(1):1-10. · 0.68 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
2 tests
3 tests
antibody levels
antibody levels pos-treatment
Chagas Disease
chronic Chagas disease
conventional serologic tests
conventional serological titers
main limitations
new multiplex assay
partial seronegative conversion
reliable tests
serology specific
significant decrease
strong concordance
T. cruzi antibodies
T. cruzi infection
treatment effectiveness
treatment impact
years post-treatment