ACR Appropriateness Criteria (R) Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. The Breast Journal
(Impact Factor: 1.41).
09/2011; 17(6):579-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01150.x
Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a disease that is heterogeneous in its presentation, potentially curable, and generally necessitating multidisciplinary management. Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in the management of LABC. The integration of radiation with surgery, chemotherapy, and sometimes breast reconstruction can be complex. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Breast Committee aims to provide guidance for the management of a variety of LABC cases. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria is evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is either lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Available from: Fatima Cardoso
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The 1st international Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 1) took place on November 2011, in Lisbon. Consensus guidelines for the management of this disease were developed. This manuscript summarizes these international consensus guidelines.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 03/2012; 21(3):242-52. DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.003 · 2.38 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Preoperative systemic therapy with cytotoxic or biologic anticancer regimens has gained significant popularity in the management of breast cancer. Moreover, there is a worldwide paradigm shift toward an individualized approach to identify predictive surrogate markers for stratifying patients into distinct subgroups to improve outcome after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Although achievement of pathologic complete response constitutes the gold standard for assessing therapeutic efficacy only a minority of patients achieve a pathologic complete response. Imaging has evolved to play a crucial role in monitoring treatment effectiveness, particularly, early during therapy. There is mounting evidence that (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a more superior metabolic imaging modality than anatomic modalities for assessment of the response during or at completion of treatment. Ultimately, the prediction of therapeutic effectiveness or survival or both by FDG-PET imaging could successfully tailor treatment and avoid unnecessary toxicities. This paper provides an overview of current use and the main indications of FDG-PET and integrated PET/computed tomography in response assessment of breast cancer as well as the future directions for the management using non-FDG-based tracers developed against specific targets.
Seminars in nuclear medicine 07/2013; 43(4):299-316. DOI:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.03.001 · 3.34 Impact Factor
Available from: Joseph Gligorov
Annals of Oncology 09/2014; 25(10):871-88. DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdu385 · 7.04 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.