"I'm Supposed to Be In Charge": Self-Advocates' Perspectives on Their Self-Determination Support Needs

Bureau of Autism Services, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, USA.
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Impact Factor: 1.13). 10/2011; 49(5):327-40. DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-49.5.327
Source: PubMed


In this qualitative interview study, we explored the perceptions of adults with intellectual disability regarding interpersonal or social supports needed to express their own self-determination. Specifically, 10 adults, all members of a self-advocacy group, were asked to discuss their understanding of the term self-determination and ways in which support staff have either supported or inhibited their self-determination. Ten themes characterizing supportive and impeding staff actions were identified. The need for greater exploration of environmental and social influences on self-determination is emphasized.

34 Reads
  • Source
    • "While Self- Advocacy can produce deeper senses of community, culture, identity formation, and disability pride (Caldwell, 2011; Carlson, 2010; Spassiani and Friedman, 2014), it is also noted for its liberatory potential because it directly challenges deficit-based understandings of IDD by continually pushing for self-determination. While there are various definitions of self-determination, self-advocates define self-determination as making themselves heard about their wants and needs, including both daily decisions and larger goals (Nonnemacher and Bambara, 2011). Interdependence is a core aspect of self-determination for people with IDD because they often rely on other people in their lives to provide support so they can enact their self-determination (Wehmeyer, 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: People with intellectual and developmental disabilities must often advocate for themselves in many facets of life, including sexuality. Because of this, sexual self-advocacy is an important concept to develop and apply to policy and practice. This paper provides a conceptualization of sexual self-advocacy, a view of sexuality formulated by adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities that is closely tied to the values of the Self-Advocacy Movement. In describing the study process, this paper also puts forth the Participatory Action Research method, Nominal Group Technique, as an accessible method for gaining insight from adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The choice of Nominal Group Technique as a research method was motivated by several factors. Nominal Group Technique served to counterbalance many of the potential research difficulties when working with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, including the need for understandable, inclusive, and participatory ways to access data from people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and addressed the topic of sexual self-advocacy that is important to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
    Qualitative Social Work 06/2015; DOI:10.1177/1473325015589803
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This paper presents findings from a qualitative research project on an English self-advocacy organization. In light of recent political and economic developments that have threatened the sustainability of a number of self-advocacy groups for people with intellectual disability, I seek to explore how one particular organization managed to survive and grow. In particular, the paper explores themes of management, leadership, and user control, linking these to external perceptions about self-advocacy organizations. The organization in my study developed an "interdependent" governance model based on key organizational roles for nondisabled advisors and self-advocates, which proved popular with external funders. Despite the organization's notable achievements, its success raises questions for the wider self-advocacy movement, notably how leadership capacity can be developed among self-advocates.
    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 12/2013; 51(6):470-81. DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-51.6.470 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines Brantlinger and colleagues' longitudinal case study Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility [Brantlinger, E.A., S.M. Klein, and S.L. Guskin. 1994. Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility. New York: Teachers College Press]. I describe how this piece resonated with me as a mother of a boy considered to have significant disabilities and how it informed my practice as an emerging qualitative researcher. I explore the relationship between this form of methodology and the ‘subjects’ agency referring to my own research and others in the humanities. Brantlinger's work here is historical in its documentation of the experience of a teenager with a label of autism who has not been supported in developing conventional communication and who becomes pregnant and has a child. It is illustrative of the unique contributions she made towards understanding the complexities of daily life for families with children with disabilities. Two decades have passed since this study was published and yet the methodology and lessons learned remain important to informing those of us who value the humanity of people with significant disabilities and respect their sense of agency. Finally, the possible implications for the activist researcher, such as Brantlinger, are discussed.
    International Journal of Inclusive Education 12/2013; 17(12). DOI:10.1080/13603116.2013.781237 · 0.35 Impact Factor
Show more