"I'm Supposed to Be In Charge": Self-Advocates' Perspectives on Their Self-Determination Support Needs

Bureau of Autism Services, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, USA.
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Impact Factor: 1.13). 10/2011; 49(5):327-40. DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-49.5.327
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this qualitative interview study, we explored the perceptions of adults with intellectual disability regarding interpersonal or social supports needed to express their own self-determination. Specifically, 10 adults, all members of a self-advocacy group, were asked to discuss their understanding of the term self-determination and ways in which support staff have either supported or inhibited their self-determination. Ten themes characterizing supportive and impeding staff actions were identified. The need for greater exploration of environmental and social influences on self-determination is emphasized.

14 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This paper presents findings from a qualitative research project on an English self-advocacy organization. In light of recent political and economic developments that have threatened the sustainability of a number of self-advocacy groups for people with intellectual disability, I seek to explore how one particular organization managed to survive and grow. In particular, the paper explores themes of management, leadership, and user control, linking these to external perceptions about self-advocacy organizations. The organization in my study developed an "interdependent" governance model based on key organizational roles for nondisabled advisors and self-advocates, which proved popular with external funders. Despite the organization's notable achievements, its success raises questions for the wider self-advocacy movement, notably how leadership capacity can be developed among self-advocates.
    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 12/2013; 51(6):470-81. DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-51.6.470 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines Brantlinger and colleagues' longitudinal case study Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility [Brantlinger, E.A., S.M. Klein, and S.L. Guskin. 1994. Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility. New York: Teachers College Press]. I describe how this piece resonated with me as a mother of a boy considered to have significant disabilities and how it informed my practice as an emerging qualitative researcher. I explore the relationship between this form of methodology and the ‘subjects’ agency referring to my own research and others in the humanities. Brantlinger's work here is historical in its documentation of the experience of a teenager with a label of autism who has not been supported in developing conventional communication and who becomes pregnant and has a child. It is illustrative of the unique contributions she made towards understanding the complexities of daily life for families with children with disabilities. Two decades have passed since this study was published and yet the methodology and lessons learned remain important to informing those of us who value the humanity of people with significant disabilities and respect their sense of agency. Finally, the possible implications for the activist researcher, such as Brantlinger, are discussed.
    International Journal of Inclusive Education 12/2013; 17(12). DOI:10.1080/13603116.2013.781237 · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accessible SummaryPeople who get paid to support people with intellectual disabilities need to understand what is important to people with intellectual disabilities and how to help them get what they want. We asked people with intellectual disabilities and people paid to support them about what is important to people with disabilities and how people with disabilities can get what they want. We learned that: The people with intellectual disabilities whom we talked to knew what they wanted. The support people that we talked to had a hard time figuring out what people with intellectual disabilities wanted and how they could help them get what they wanted. The support people that we talked to said that some of the rules at their jobs made it hard to help people with intellectual disabilities to do what they wanted. Nearly everyone we talked to said that it was important to support people with intellectual disabilities in a caring way. SummaryThis study from the south-western United States investigated the perceptions of persons with intellectual disability receiving support and of persons providing support regarding the autonomy of people with intellectual disability. The participants included 10 people with intellectual disability and 10 support workers. Through interviews, this qualitative investigation examined issues related to autonomy in support services. Analysis of participant interviews revealed that support workers and people with intellectual disability faced challenges that restricted the promotion of the autonomy of people with intellectual disability. Both groups of participants noted that support workers had to care about their work with individuals with intellectual disability to effectively promote their autonomy.
    British Journal of Learning Disabilities 02/2014; 43(1). DOI:10.1111/bld.12084 · 0.26 Impact Factor
Show more