"I'm Supposed to Be In Charge": Self-Advocates' Perspectives on Their Self-Determination Support Needs

Bureau of Autism Services, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, USA.
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Impact Factor: 1.13). 10/2011; 49(5):327-40. DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-49.5.327
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this qualitative interview study, we explored the perceptions of adults with intellectual disability regarding interpersonal or social supports needed to express their own self-determination. Specifically, 10 adults, all members of a self-advocacy group, were asked to discuss their understanding of the term self-determination and ways in which support staff have either supported or inhibited their self-determination. Ten themes characterizing supportive and impeding staff actions were identified. The need for greater exploration of environmental and social influences on self-determination is emphasized.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This paper presents findings from a qualitative research project on an English self-advocacy organization. In light of recent political and economic developments that have threatened the sustainability of a number of self-advocacy groups for people with intellectual disability, I seek to explore how one particular organization managed to survive and grow. In particular, the paper explores themes of management, leadership, and user control, linking these to external perceptions about self-advocacy organizations. The organization in my study developed an "interdependent" governance model based on key organizational roles for nondisabled advisors and self-advocates, which proved popular with external funders. Despite the organization's notable achievements, its success raises questions for the wider self-advocacy movement, notably how leadership capacity can be developed among self-advocates.
    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 12/2013; 51(6):470-81. DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-51.6.470 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines Brantlinger and colleagues' longitudinal case study Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility [Brantlinger, E.A., S.M. Klein, and S.L. Guskin. 1994. Fighting for Darla; Challenges for family care and professional responsibility. New York: Teachers College Press]. I describe how this piece resonated with me as a mother of a boy considered to have significant disabilities and how it informed my practice as an emerging qualitative researcher. I explore the relationship between this form of methodology and the ‘subjects’ agency referring to my own research and others in the humanities. Brantlinger's work here is historical in its documentation of the experience of a teenager with a label of autism who has not been supported in developing conventional communication and who becomes pregnant and has a child. It is illustrative of the unique contributions she made towards understanding the complexities of daily life for families with children with disabilities. Two decades have passed since this study was published and yet the methodology and lessons learned remain important to informing those of us who value the humanity of people with significant disabilities and respect their sense of agency. Finally, the possible implications for the activist researcher, such as Brantlinger, are discussed.
    International Journal of Inclusive Education 12/2013; 17(12). DOI:10.1080/13603116.2013.781237 · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Women with intellectual disabilities often experience limitations to their autonomy, despite the enactment of international treaties, such as “UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities” and “Active ageing: A policy framework”. Specific Aims. This paper examines the sense of autonomy experienced by 55 older women with intellectual disabilities from New South Wales (Australia) and Czech Republic (Europe). The aim was to identify factors both limiting and contributing to a sense of autonomy held by older-aged women with intellectual disabilities. Method. The women were recruited via support groups, employment agencies for persons with disabilities, day centres, sheltered workshops, self-advocacy groups and non-governmental organizations. The participating women were interviewed and the conducted interviews were analysed following a grounded theory approach. Findings. The study identified two factors with potential to limit autonomy of women with intellectual disabilities: (1) intra-individual factors (e.g., health issues), and (2) environmental factors (e.g., living arrangements, managing finances). Drawing on responses from women, the authors propose factors that may have a potential to strengthen autonomy of these women. Discussion. The implications for research and practice are highlighted, with a special focus on the need for families and service providers to be aware of ways to support autonomy of older women with intellectual disabilities.
    Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 02/2015; 12(1). DOI:10.1111/jppi.12097 · 0.97 Impact Factor