Seek and Ye Shall Find: Consumer Search for Objective Health Care Cost and Quality Information

University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
American Journal of Medical Quality (Impact Factor: 1.78). 09/2011; 26(6):433-40. DOI: 10.1177/1062860611400898
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Significant investments have been made in developing and disseminating health care provider cost and quality information on the Internet with the expectation that stronger consumer engagement will lead consumers to seek providers who deliver high-quality, low-cost care. However, prior research shows that the awareness and use of such information is low. This study investigates how the information search process may contribute to explaining this result. The analysis reveals that the Web sites most likely to be found by consumers are owned by private companies and provide information based on anecdotal patient experiences. Web sites less likely to be found have government or community-based ownership, are based on administrative data, and contain a mixture of quality, cost, and patient experience information. Searches for information on hospitals reveal more cost and quality information based on administrative data, whereas searches that focus on clinics or physicians are more likely to produce information based on patient narratives.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : As indicators of clinician quality proliferate, public reports increasingly include multiple metrics. This approach provides more complete performance information than did earlier reports but may challenge consumers' ability to understand and use complicated reports. : To assess the effects of report complexity on consumers' understanding and use of patient experience measures derived from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. : In an Internet-based experiment, participants were asked to compare information on physician quality and choose a primary care doctor. Participants were randomly assigned to choice sets of varied complexity (CAHPS alone vs. CAHPS with other measures) and number of doctors. Participants completed surveys before and after this choice task. : A total of 555 US residents, aged 25-64, who had Internet access through computer were recruited from an existing online panel. : Recall seeing CAHPS measures; use of CAHPS measures for making choices; ratings of ease of use, usefulness and trustworthiness of CAHPS ratings; concerns about usefulness and trustworthiness. : Participants presented with CAHPS information and other performance indicators relied less on CAHPS than did those presented with CAHPS information only, although they considered CAHPS information as valuable as did other respondents. Participants presented with smaller choice sets also judged CAHPS information as less easy to use when accompanied by other metrics than when it was presented alone.
    Medical care 11/2012; 50 Suppl(11):S56-64. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826c84e1 · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For patients to be engaged, they will need meaningful and comparable information about the quality and cost of health care. We conducted a literature review and key-informant interviews, reviewed selected online reporting tools, and found that quality and cost reporting fell into two categories. One emphasizes public reporting of information, supported by philanthropic or government institutions that aim to improve provider quality and efficiency. The other is characterized by proprietary websites that aim to provide personalized, integrated information on cost and quality to support consumers' decision making on providers and services. What consumers seem to want is quality data at the physician level and cost data that reflect their personal out-of-pocket exposure. These needs will be acute under the coverage expansions inherent in the Affordable Care Act. State and federal policy thus should support all-payer claims databases, standards for electronic health records to facilitate sharing of quality data, and a unified approach to presenting information that prioritizes consumers' needs.
    Health Affairs 02/2013; 32(2):328-37. DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1077 · 4.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Significant investments have been made to provide comparative healthcare quality information (CQI) to the public, but whether these efforts are increasing awareness of CQI is unknown. To provide regional estimates of change in awareness of CQI among the chronically ill population residing in 14 geographic regions of the United States between 2008 and 2012. Additionally, to examine its correlation with the changes in the availability of quality reports. Data from 2 waves (2008 and 2012) of a random-digit dial survey of 11,896 adults with chronic illness. Regression-adjusted change in the percentage of respondents aware of physician and hospital CQI, and Pearson correlations between regional change in awareness of CQI and regional change in availability of quality reports. While the number of reports on both hospital quality and physician quality increased between 2008 and 2012, there was significant change in awareness of only physician CQI (12.8% to 16.2%, regression-adjusted change of 3.7 percentage points; P < .05). No significant correlation was found between the change in awareness of CQI and the change in availability of hospital quality reports or physician quality reports. Awareness of physician CQI among the chronically ill increased modestly between 2008 and 2012, but no significant increase in awareness of hospital quality was observed. As efforts to report CQI accelerate, more attention to approaches to dissemination may be warranted in order to increase awareness in the chronically ill population.
    The American journal of managed care 03/2015; 21(3):236-44. · 2.17 Impact Factor