Article

Hospital-wide mortality as a quality metric: conceptual and methodological challenges.

Center for Quality and Safety and Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
American Journal of Medical Quality (impact factor: 1.64). 09/2011; 27(2):112-23. DOI:10.1177/1062860611412358
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hospital-wide mortality rates are used as a measure of overall hospital quality. However, their parsimony and apparent simplicity belie significant conceptual and methodological concerns. For many diagnoses included in hospital-wide mortality, the association between short-term mortality and quality of care is not well established. Furthermore, compared with condition-specific or procedure-specific mortality, hospital-wide mortality rates pose greater methodological challenges (ie, eligibility and exclusion criteria, risk adjustment, statistical techniques for aggregating across diagnoses, usability). Many of these result from substantial interprovider heterogeneity in diagnosis frequency, sample sizes, and patient severity. Hospital-wide mortality is problematic as a quality metric for public reporting, although hospitals may elect to use such measures for other purposes. Potential alternative approaches include multidimensional composite metrics or mortality measurement limited to selected conditions and procedures for which the link between hospital mortality and quality is clear, legitimate exclusions are uncommon, and sample sizes, end points, and risk adjustment are adequate.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views
  • Article: Trends in Canadian hospital standardised mortality ratios and palliative care coding 2004-2010: a retrospective database analysis.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR), anchored at an average score of 100, is a controversial macromeasure of hospital quality. The measure may be dependent on differences in patient coding, particularly since cases labelled as palliative are typically excluded. To determine whether palliative coding in Canada has changed since the 2007 national introduction of publicly released HSMRs, and how such changes may have affected results. Retrospective database analysis. Inpatients in Canadian hospitals from April 2004 to March 2010. 12 593 329 hospital discharges recorded in the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database from April 2004 to March 2010. Crude mortality and palliative care coding rates. HSMRs calculated with the same methodology as CIHI. A derived hospital standardised palliative ratio (HSPR) adjusted to a baseline average of 100 in 2004-2005. Recalculated HSMRs that included palliative cases under varying scenarios. Crude mortality and palliative care coding rates have been increasing over time (p<0.001), in keeping with the nation's advancing overall morbidity. HSMRs in 2008-2010 were significantly lower than in 2004-2006 by 8.55 points (p<0.001). The corresponding HSPR rises dramatically between these two time periods by 48.83 points (p<0.001). Under various HSMR scenarios that included palliative cases, the HSMR would have at most decreased by 6.35 points, and may have even increased slightly. Inability to calculate a definitively comparable HSMR that include palliative cases and to account for closely timed changes in national palliative care coding guidelines. Palliative coding rates in Canadian hospitals have increased dramatically since the public release of HSMR results. This change may have partially contributed to the observed national decline in HSMR.
    BMJ open. 01/2012; 2(6).

Keywords

apparent simplicity belie significant conceptual
 
exclusion criteria
 
greater methodological challenges
 
hospital mortality
 
hospital quality
 
Hospital-wide mortality
 
Hospital-wide mortality rates
 
legitimate exclusions
 
mortality measurement limited
 
multidimensional composite metrics
 
patient severity
 
Potential alternative approaches
 
procedure-specific mortality
 
procedures
 
purposes
 
risk adjustment
 
sample sizes
 
short-term mortality
 
statistical techniques
 
substantial interprovider heterogeneity