Article

Bone tissue engineering bioreactors: a role in the clinic?

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews (Impact Factor: 4.64). 09/2011; 18(1):62-75. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0209
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tissue engineered bone grafts have the potential to be used to treat large bone defects due to congenital abnormalities, cancer resections, or traumatic incidents. Recent studies have shown that perfusion bioreactors can be used to generate grafts of clinically relevant sizes and shapes. Despite these scientific and technological successes, there is uncertainty regarding the translational utility of bioreactor-based approaches due to the perceived high costs associated with these procedures. In fact, experiences over the past two decades have demonstrated that the widespread application of cell-based therapies is heavily dependent on the commercial viability. In this article, we directly address the question of whether bioreactors used to create bone grafts have the potential to be implemented in clinical approaches to bone repair and regeneration. We provide a brief review of tissue engineering approaches to bone repair, clinical trials that have employed cell-based methods, and advances in bioreactor technologies over the past two decades. These analyses are combined to provide a perspective on what is missing from the scientific literature that would enable an objective baseline for weighing the benefit of extended in vitro cultivation of cells into functional bone grafts against the cost of additional cultivation. In our estimation, the cost of bioreactor-based bone grafts may range from $10,000 to $15,000, placing it within the range of other widely used cell-based therapies. Therefore, in situations where a clear advantage can be established for engineered grafts comprising patient-specific, autologous cells, engineered bone grafts may be a clinically feasible option.

1 Bookmark
 · 
165 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Orthopedic injuries are common and a source of much misery and economic stress. Several relevant tissues, such as cartilage, meniscus, and intra-articular ligaments, do not heal. And even bone, which normally regenerates spontaneously, can fail to mend. The regeneration of orthopedic tissues requires 4 key components: cells, morphogenetic signals, scaffolds, and an appropriate mechanical environment. Although differentiated cells from the tissue in question can be used, most cellular research focuses on the use of mesenchymal stem cells. These can be retrieved from many different tissues, and one unresolved question is the degree to which the origin of the cells matters. Embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells are also under investigation. Morphogenetic signals are most frequently supplied by individual recombinant growth factors or native mixtures provided by, for example, platelet-rich plasma; mesenchymal stem cells are also a rich source of trophic factors. Obstacles to the sustained delivery of individual growth factors can be addressed by gene transfer or smart scaffolds, but we still lack detailed, necessary information on which delivery profiles are needed. Scaffolds may be based on natural products, synthetic materials, or devitalized extracellular matrix. Strategies to combine these components to regenerate tissue can follow traditional tissue engineering practices, but these are costly, cumbersome, and not well suited to treating large numbers of individuals. More expeditious approaches make full use of intrinsic biological processes in vivo to avoid the need for ex vivo expansion of autologous cells and multiple procedures. Clinical translation remains a bottleneck.
    Mayo Clinic Proceedings 11/2013; 88(11):1323-39. · 5.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are potent osteogenic molecules that are used for bone repair in delivery systems and in regenerative medicine. We studied the responses of murine MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts to doses of recombinant human (rh)BMP-9 with and without foetal bovine serum (FBS). rhBMP-2 was used as a control since it is currently approved by the FDA for bone application. We analysed the major cell signalling pathways and the expression of osteogenic markers. Without FBS, BMP-9 had similar effect on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts differentiation in comparison to BMP-2. In contrast, FBS reduced the EC50 of BMP-9 4- to 6-fold, as determined by osterix gene expression and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, while it had no influence on EC50 of BMP-2. As suggested by MAPK inhibitor assays, FBS could induce an intracellular signalling environment that favours the cell response to BMP-9 by inhibiting ERK1/2 activation and increasing p38 phosphorylation. Finally, IGF-2 (100 ng/mL) could mimic the effect of FBS on BMP-9 cell response in terms of MAPK signalling and ALP activity. Thus, the action of BMP-9 on preosteoblast differentiation can be greatly improved by IGF-2. This finding may well be critical for developing optimal growth factor delivery systems and bone tissue engineering strategies.
    Tissue Engineering Part A 03/2014; · 4.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of multifactorial design of experiments (DoE) in tissue engineering bioprocess development will contribute to the robust manufacturing of tissue engineered constructs by linking their quality characteristics to bioprocess operating parameters. In this work, perfusion bioreactors were used for the in vitro culture and osteogenic differentiation of human periosteum-derived cells (hPDCs) seeded on three-dimensional titanium (Ti) alloy scaffolds. A CaP-supplemented medium was used to induce differentiation of the cultured hPDCs. A two-level, three-factor fractional factorial design was employed to evaluate a range of bioreactor operating conditions by changing the levels of the following parameters: flow rate (0.5–2 mL/min), cell culture duration (7–21 days) and cell seeding density (1.5 × 10^3–3 × 10^3 cells/cm2). This approach allowed for evaluating the individual impact of the aforementioned process parameters upon a range of genes that are related to the osteogenic lineage, such as collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, osterix, osteopontin and osteocalcin. Furthermore, by overlaying gene-specific response surfaces, an integrated operating process space was highlighted within which predetermined values of the six genes of interest (i.e., gene signature) could be minimally met over the course of the bioreactor culture time.
    Processes. 08/2014; 2(3):639-657.