Frequency of fetal heart rate categories and short-term neonatal outcome.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.8). 09/2011; 118(4):803-8. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f1b50
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate the time spent in each fetal heart rate category during labor and during the last 2 hours before delivery in term singleton pregnancy and to estimate the relationship between the time spent in each category and short-term neonatal outcomes.
This study reviewed fetal heart rate data and newborn outcomes of women in term labor in 10 hospitals over 28 months. Fetal heart rate characteristics were assessed by labor and delivery nurses, and categories were assigned by computer using definitions from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The duration of time in each category was calculated and correlated with newborn outcome.
Forty-eight thousand four hundred forty-four patients were identified. Considering all of labor, category I was present 77.9% of the time, category II was present 22.1% of the time, and category III was present 0.004% of the time. In the last 2 hours before delivery, category I decreased to 60.9% of the duration, category II increased to 39.1%, and category III increased to 0.006%. Newborns of women whose last 2 hours were exclusively category I did well; only 0.6% had 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7, and 0.2% had low Apgar scores with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. When more than 75% of the last 2 hours was category II, low 5-minute Apgar score increased to 1.3% of patients, and low 5-minute Apgar score with NICU admission increased to 0.7% (both P<.001).
Category I and category II fetal heart rate patterns are common in labor, and category III patterns are rare. Increasing time in category II in the last 2 hours of labor is associated with increased short-term newborn morbidity.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New evidence regarding normal parameters of labor progress for healthy women has the potential to minimize risk of cesarean birth and thereby enhance current and future maternal well-being if clinicians apply the research findings to obstetric practice. The economic and reproductive health consequences of the increasing cesarean birth rate in the United States are considerable; therefore, action on this issue by all stakeholders is necessary. Review and integration of the recent recommendations for labor management from experts convened by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine are required to make maternity care in the United States as safe as possible.
    The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing 28(2):108-116. · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of electronic fetal heart rate abnormalities in the identification of neonates with encephalopathy treated with whole-body hypothermia.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 09/2014; 124(3):507-513. · 4.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Original interpretations of fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns equated FHR decelerations with 'fetal distress', requiring expeditious delivery. This simplistic interpretation is still implied in our clinical guidelines despite 40 years of increasing understanding of the behaviour and regulation of the fetal cardiovascular system during labour. The physiological basis of FHR responses and adaptations to oxygen deprivation is de-emphasised, whilst generations of obstetricians and midwives are trained to focus on, and classify, the morphological appearances of decelerations into descriptive categories, with no attempt to understand how the fetus defends itself and compensates for intrapartum hypoxic ischaemic insults, or the patterns that suggest progressive loss of compensation. Consequently, there is a lack of confidence, marked variation in FHR interpretation, defensive practices, unnecessary operative interventions, and a failure to recognise abnormal FHR patterns, resulting in adverse outcomes and expensive litigation.
    BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 06/2014; · 3.76 Impact Factor


Available from