Evaluation of an Algorithm for Detecting Visual Field Defects Due to Chiasmal and Postchiasmal Lesions: The Neurological Hemifield Test

Glaucoma Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science (Impact Factor: 3.4). 09/2011; 52(11):7959-65. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7868
Source: PubMed


To develop an automated neurologic hemifield test (NHT) to detect visual field loss caused by chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions.
Visual field locations from 24-2 pattern automated visual fields were grouped into two symmetric regions with 16 points on either side of the vertical meridian. A scoring system similar to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) was used to calculate point scores using the pattern deviation values from the right and left regions. The cross-vertical difference in the sum of these values was the NHT score. The NHT was evaluated using visual fields from subjects with known neurologic disease, subjects with glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects (92 pairs of eyes each). The NHT score was calculated for each eye. Four masked reviewers scored all pairs of visual fields with regard to the likelihood of neurologic and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Both NHT score and expert field ratings were compared with clinical diagnosis by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
The NHT effectively discriminated neurologic fields from those of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.94). The NHT score correlated well with clinician grading (Pearson correlation estimates, 0.74-0.78). Even when field defects were subtle, the NHT had some ability to discriminate neurologic from nonneurologic fields (AUC 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79).
The NHT distinguished neurologic field defects from those of glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, rivaling the performance of subspecialist clinicians. Its implementation may help identify unsuspected neurologic disease.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael V Boland, Oct 09, 2015
1 Follower
34 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to investigate the diagnostic ability of the neurologic hemifield test (NHT) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements to detect chiasmal compression. Thirty-seven patients with chiasmal compression, 35 patients with glaucoma, and 30 patients with glaucoma suspect were enrolled. The NHT score was established from a 30-2 visual field pattern deviation probability plot. Each test point value was calculated for a number that was inversely proportional to its pattern deviation probability. The NHT score was the absolute value of the difference in the sum of the point scores for two symmetrical regions of 16 points on either side of the vertical meridian. RNFL thickness was scored from 0 to 10 according to the pattern of RNFL loss and probability of abnormality. Solely present nasal or temporal RNFL defects were scored high, and exclusively appearing superior or nasal RNFL defects were scored low. The differences in the NHT and RNFL scores among the three groups were compared. Diagnostic ability was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The NHT and RNFL scores were significantly higher in patients with chiasmal compression than in patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect. The area under the ROC curve (AROC) was 0.734 of the NHT score and 0.613 of the RNFL score. When AROC was calculated using the NHT and RNFL scores concurrently, AROC was increased to 0.807. The NHT score and RNFL score have diagnostic ability to detect chiasmal compression, and simultaneous assessment of NHT and RNFL scores improves the diagnostic power.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 07/2012; 53(9):5410-5. DOI:10.1167/iovs.12-9905 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While glaucoma is the most common cause of optic disc cupping, it can also be seen in a number of congenital and acquired optic neuropathies. It behooves both glaucoma and neuro-ophthalmic specialists to be able to differentiate glaucoma from neurological conditions, which give a similar ophthalmoscopic appearance to the optic disc. This review is a combination of the authors' clinical experience from tertiary glaucoma and neuro-ophthalmology referral centers, combined with a literature review using PubMed. Even for experienced observers, differentiation between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous cupping can be difficult. In the majority of cases, this distinction can be made following a careful clinical examination combined with a variety of imaging techniques. Possible mechanisms, which lead to changes in optic disc morphology, are reviewed. Differentiating glaucomatous from nonglaucomatous optic disc cupping can be a formidable challenge for the clinician. Examination of the patient combined with imaging of the retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc topography provides a basis to resolve this clinical conundrum.
    Journal of neuro-ophthalmology: the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society 12/2013; 33(4):377-389. DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000080 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To improve the neurological hemifield test (NHT) using visual field data from both eyes to detect and classify visual field loss caused by chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions. Methods: Visual field and clinical data for 633 patients were divided into a training set (474 cases) and a validation set (159 cases). Each set had equal numbers of neurological, glaucoma, or glaucoma suspect cases, matched for age and for mean deviation between neurological and glaucoma cases. NHT scores as previously described and a new NHT laterality score were calculated. The ability of these scores to distinguish neurological from other fields was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Three machine classifier algorithms were also evaluated: decision tree, random forest, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). We also evaluated the ability of NHT to identify the type of neurological field defect (homonymous or bitemporal). Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the maximum NHT score was 0.92 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 0.97). Using NHT laterality scores from each eye combined with the sum of NHT scores, the AUC improved to 0.93 (CI: 0.88, 0.98). The largest AUC for machine learning algorithms was for the LASSO method (0.96, CI: 0.92, 0.99). The NHT scores identified the type of neurological defect in 96% (158/164) of patients. Conclusions: The new NHT distinguished neurological field defects from those of glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, providing accurate categorization of defect type. Its implementation may identify unsuspected neurological disease in clinical visual field testing.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 01/2014; 55(2). DOI:10.1167/iovs.13-13702 · 3.40 Impact Factor