Article

Emergency Treatment of Deliberate Self-harm

Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Archives of general psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.75). 09/2011; 69(1):80-8. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although concern exists over the quality of emergency mental health services, little is known about the mental health care of adults who are admitted to emergency departments for deliberately harming themselves and then discharged to the community.
To describe the predictors of emergency department discharge, the emergency mental health assessments, and the follow-up outpatient mental health care of adult Medicaid beneficiaries treated for deliberate self-harm.
A retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis.
National Medicaid claims data supplemented with county-level sociodemographic variables and Medicaid state policy survey data.
Adults aged 21 to 64 years who were treated in emergency departments for 7355 episodes of deliberate self-harm, focusing on those who were discharged to the community (4595 episodes).
Rates and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) of discharge to the community, mental health assessments in the emergency department, and outpatient mental health visits during the 30 days following the emergency department visit.
Most patients (62.5%) were discharged to the community. Emergency department discharge was directly related to younger patient age (21-31 years vs 45-64 years) (ARR, 1.18 [99% confidence interval {CI}, 1.10-1.25]) and self-harm by cutting (ARR, 1.18 [99% CI, 1.12-1.24]) and inversely related to poisoning (ARR, 0.84 [99% CI, 0.80-0.89]) and recent psychiatric hospitalization (ARR, 0.74 [99% CI, 0.67-0.81]). Approximately one-half of discharged patients (47.5%) received a mental health assessment in the emergency department, and a similar percentage of discharged patients (52.4%) received a follow-up outpatient mental health visit within 30 days. Follow-up mental health care was directly related to recent outpatient mental health care (ARR, 2.30 [99% CI, 2.11-2.50]) and treatment in a state with Medicaid coverage of mental health clinic services (ARR, 1.13 [99% CI, 1.05-1.22]) and inversely related to African American (ARR, 0.86 [99% CI, 0.75-0.96]) and Hispanic (ARR, 0.86 [99% CI, 0.75-0.99]) race/ethnicity.
Most adult Medicaid beneficiaries who present for emergency care for deliberate self-harm are discharged to the community, and many do not receive emergency mental health assessments or follow-up outpatient mental health care.

0 Followers
 · 
97 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suicide is an important public health problem. Although there have been advances in our knowledge of suicide, gaps remain in knowledge about suicide risk factors and prevention. Here, we discuss research pathways that have the potential to rapidly advance knowledge in suicide risk assessment and reduction of suicide deaths over the next decade. We provide a concise overview of the methodologic approaches that have the capacity to rapidly increase knowledge and change practice, which have been successful in past work in psychiatry and other areas of medicine. We suggest three specific pathways to advance knowledge of suicide risk factors and prevention. First, analysis of large-scale epidemiologic surveys and administrative data sets can advance the understanding of suicide. Second, given the low base rate of suicide, there is a need for networks/consortia of investigators in the field of suicide prevention. Such consortia have the capacity to analyze existing epidemiologic data sets, create multi-site cohort studies of high-risk groups to increase knowledge of biological and other risk factors, and create a platform for multi-site clinical trials. Third, partnerships with policymakers and researchers would facilitate careful scientific evaluation of policies and programs aimed at reducing suicide. Suicide intervention policies are often multifaceted, expensive, and rarely evaluated. Using quasi-experimental methods or sophisticated analytic strategies such as propensity score-matching techniques, the impact of large-scale interventions on suicide can be evaluated. Furthermore, such partnerships between policymakers and researchers can lead to the design and support of prospective RCTs (e.g., cluster randomized trials, stepped wedge designs, waiting list designs) in high-risk groups (e.g., people with a history of suicide attempts, multi-axial comorbidity, and offspring of people who have died by suicide). These research pathways could lead to rapid knowledge uptake between communities and have the strong potential to reduce suicide.
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine 09/2014; 47(3):S257–S263. DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.05.041 · 4.28 Impact Factor
  • Depression and Anxiety 11/2014; DOI:10.1002/da.22320 · 4.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Suicide continues to be a world-wide problem. For every suicide there are many more suicide attempts and acts of deliberate self-harm. The Emergency Department (ED) of the public hospital is at the forefront of an increasing presentation rate of patients in the acute phase of mental illness or suicide risk, requiring specialised mental health risk assessment. Little is known of mental health patient views about their experience in the ED, yet consumer views are seen as an important factor in measuring the quality of psychiatric assessment and treatment. This paper sets out to examine consumer experiences of psychiatric assessment in the ED. Twenty participants, assessed in one of three public hospital EDs in Melbourne, Australia, following a suicide or deliberate self-harm (DSH) attempt, completed an anonymous online mixed method questionnaire. Participants reported an overall improvement in mood and expressed a positive view of the quality of service from the ED psychiatric team. Most helpful to participants was being listened to, not feeling judged, and having time to talk. What they found unhelpful was the lack of a private area for assessment, feeling ‘labelled’, and at times a lack of individual focus. What became apparent during this study was the difficulty in recruiting participants. A more direct-approach design to encouraging consumers to participate may increase response rates, however, privacy and power dynamics would pose an ethical challenge. Even though participation rate was low, the preliminary message from these ED consumers is still useful in formulating the beginnings of an important conversation with this group.
    International journal of medical sciences 02/2015; 3(1). · 1.55 Impact Factor