What's wrong with correlative experiments?

Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Nature Cell Biology (Impact Factor: 19.68). 09/2011; 13(9):1011. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2325
Source: PubMed


Here, we make a case for multivariate measurements in cell biology with minimal perturbation. We discuss how correlative data can identify cause-effect relationships in cellular pathways with potentially greater accuracy than conventional perturbation studies.

1 Follower
7 Reads
  • Source
    • "The extension of correlative analyses to delineate causal influence marks a significant advance. As noted in a recent commentary, the majority of analyses in cell biology are correlative, with the analysis of causation remaining infrequent [15]. This is particularly true at a systemic level where complex patterns of inter-feature causation are considered. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heterogeneous and dynamic single cell migration behaviours arise from a complex multi-scale signalling network comprising both molecular components and macromolecular modules, among which cell-matrix adhesions and F-actin directly mediate migration. To date, the global wiring architecture characterizing this network remains poorly defined. It is also unclear whether such a wiring pattern may be stable and generalizable to different conditions, or plastic and context dependent. Here, synchronous imaging-based quantification of migration system organization, represented by 87 morphological and dynamic macromolecular module features, and migration system behaviour, i.e., migration speed, facilitated Granger causality analysis. We thereby leveraged natural cellular heterogeneity to begin mapping the directionally specific causal wiring between organizational and behavioural features of the cell migration system. This represents an important advance on commonly used correlative analyses that do not resolve causal directionality. We identified organizational features such as adhesion stability and adhesion F-actin content that, as anticipated, causally influenced cell migration speed. Strikingly, we also found that cell speed can exert causal influence over organizational features, including cell shape and adhesion complex location, thus revealing causality in directions contradictory to previous expectations. Importantly, by comparing unperturbed and signalling-modulated cells, we provide proof-of-principle that causal interaction patterns are in fact plastic and context dependent, rather than stable and generalizable.
    PLoS ONE 02/2014; 9(2):e90593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0090593 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Rigorous correlation analyses of cell images will certainly help [Vilela and Danuser, 2011] but may not be enough by itself. We believe that the combination of quantitative image analysis with modeling and controlled perturbations of the signaling molecules, such as by photoactivation [Ghosh et al., 2004; Wu et al., 2009] promises to reveal many clues on these interdependencies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A characteristic feature of motile cells as they undergo a change in motile behavior is the development of fluctuating exploratory motions of the leading edge, driven by actin polymerization. We review quantitative models of these protrusion and retraction phenomena. Theoretical studies have been motivated by advances in experimental and computational methods that allow controlled perturbations, single molecule imaging, and analysis of spatiotemporal correlations in microscopic images. To explain oscillations and waves of the leading edge, most theoretical models propose nonlinear interactions and feedback mechanisms among different components of the actin cytoskeleton system. These mechanisms include curvature-sensing membrane proteins, myosin contraction, and autocatalytic biochemical reaction kinetics. We discuss how the combination of experimental studies with modeling promises to quantify the relative importance of these biochemical and biophysical processes at the leading edge and to evaluate their generality across cell types and extracellular environments.
    Cytoskeleton 04/2012; 69(4):195-206. DOI:10.1002/cm.21017 · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cellular signal transduction occurs in complex and redundant interaction networks, which are best understood by simultaneously monitoring the activation dynamics of multiple components. Recent advances in biosensor technology have made it possible to visualize and quantify the activation of multiple network nodes in the same living cell. The precision and scope of this approach has been greatly extended by novel computational approaches (referred to as computational multiplexing) that can reveal relationships between network nodes imaged in separate cells.
    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 11/2011; 12(11):749-56. DOI:10.1038/nrm3212 · 37.81 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications