Math fluency is etiologically distinct from untimed math performance, decoding fluency, and untimed reading performance: evidence from a twin study.

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Journal of learning disabilities (Impact Factor: 1.77). 09/2011; 45(4):371-81. DOI: 10.1177/0022219411407926
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors examined whether math fluency was independent from untimed math and from reading using 314 pairs of school-aged twins drawn from the Western Reserve Reading and Math Projects. Twins were assessed through a 90-min home visit at approximately age 10 and were reassessed in their homes approximately 1 year later. Results suggested that the shared environment and genetics influenced the covariance among math fluency, untimed math measures, and reading measures. However, roughly two thirds of the variance in math fluency was independent from untimed math measures and reading, including reading fluency. The majority of this independent variance was the result of genetic factors that were longitudinally stable across two measurement occasions. These results suggest that math fluency, although related to other math measures, may also be a genetically distinct dimension of mathematics performance.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the last 20 years, longitudinal studies have demonstrated that it is important to attend to the stability of mathematical performance over time as a facet of dyscalculia, that the manifestation of mathematics difficulties changes with development, and that individual differences in cognitive profiles and learning trajectories observed in children with mathematics difficulties implicate differences between dyscalculic and non-dyscalculic subgroups. Intra-individual differences over time, and external factors related to children's learning environments, also contribute to performance trajectories; moreover, these factors may explain the inconsistent performance profiles observed among many students whose difficulty with mathematics emerges later or diminishes over time. Longitudinal studies on DD are also an important tool to elucidate why some children are more responsive to mathematics intervention than others.
    Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 06/2013; 2(2):65–73.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Working memory has been consistently associated with mathematics achievement, although the etiology of these relations remains poorly understood. The present study examined the genetic and environmental underpinnings of math story problem solving, timed calculation, and untimed calculation alongside working memory components in 12-year-old monozygotic (n = 105) and same-sex dizygotic (n = 143) twin pairs. Results indicated significant phenotypic correlation between each working memory component and all mathematics outcomes (r = 0.18–0.33). Additive genetic influences shared between the visuo-spatial sketchpad and mathematics achievement were significant, accounting for roughly 89% of the observed correlation. In addition, genetic covariance was found between the phonological loop and math story problem solving. In contrast, despite there being a significant observed relationship between phonological loop and timed and untimed calculations, there was no significant genetic or environmental covariance between the phonological loop and timed or untimed calculation skills. Further analyses indicated that genetic overlap between the visuo-spatial sketchpad and math story problem solving and math fluency was distinct from general genetic factors, whereas g, phonological loop, and mathematics shared generalist genes. Thus, although each working memory component was related to mathematics, the etiology of their relationships may be distinct.
    Intelligence 11/2014; 47:54–62. · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We explored the etiology of individual differences in reading development from post-kindergarten to post-4(th) grade by analyzing data from 487 twin pairs tested in Colorado. Data from three reading measures and one spelling measure were fit to biometric latent growth curve models, allowing us to extend previous behavioral genetic studies of the etiology of early reading development at specific time points. We found primarily genetic influences on individual differences at post-1(st) grade for all measures. Genetic influences on variance in growth rates were also found, with evidence of small, nonsignificant, shared environmental influences for two measures. We discuss our results, including their implications for educational policy.
    Scientific Studies of Reading 09/2013; 17(5):350-368. · 1.86 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014