Article

Math Fluency Is Etiologically Distinct From Untimed Math Performance, Decoding Fluency, and Untimed Reading Performance: Evidence From a Twin Study

Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Journal of Learning Disabilities (Impact Factor: 1.9). 09/2011; 45(4):371-81. DOI: 10.1177/0022219411407926
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors examined whether math fluency was independent from untimed math and from reading using 314 pairs of school-aged twins drawn from the Western Reserve Reading and Math Projects. Twins were assessed through a 90-min home visit at approximately age 10 and were reassessed in their homes approximately 1 year later. Results suggested that the shared environment and genetics influenced the covariance among math fluency, untimed math measures, and reading measures. However, roughly two thirds of the variance in math fluency was independent from untimed math measures and reading, including reading fluency. The majority of this independent variance was the result of genetic factors that were longitudinally stable across two measurement occasions. These results suggest that math fluency, although related to other math measures, may also be a genetically distinct dimension of mathematics performance.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sara Hart, Sep 02, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
123 Views
 · 
58 Downloads
  • Source
    • "The heritability of dyslexia and reading ability is high (60–70%) from a young age onwards (Hawke, Wadsworth, & Defries, 2006; Kovas et al., 2013). The heritability might be higher for timed compared to untimed tasks (Petrill et al., 2012). The current study was conducted in a large Dutch twin-family sample. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reading is the processing of written language. Family resemblance for reading (dis)ability might be due to transmission of a genetic liability or due to family environment, including cultural transmission from parents to offspring. Familial-risk studies exploring neurobehavioral precursors for dyslexia and twin studies can only speak to some of these issues, but a combined twin-family study can resolve the nature of the transmitted risk. Word-reading fluency scores of 1100 participants from 431 families (with twins, siblings and their parents) were analyzed to estimate genetic and environmental sources of variance, and to test the presence of assortative mating and cultural transmission. Results show that variation in reading ability is mainly caused by additive and non-additive genetic factors (64%). The substantial assortative mating (rfather-mother=0.38) has scientific and clinical implications. We conclude that parents and offspring tend to resemble each other for genetic reasons, and not due to cultural transmission. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Brain and Language 08/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.008 · 3.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Extending Castronovo and Göbel [1] and Mundy and Gilmore [3], we examined the relationship between children’s numerical magnitude processing skills and their mathematics performance by means of two different types of mathematics achievement tests (timed vs. untimed). This was done because both types of tests are assumed to measure genetically different aspects of math performance [27]. In line with previous studies [3], [4], [13], [15], we observed associations between children’s magnitude comparison skills and their timed and untimed mathematics performance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The ability to map between non-symbolic numerical magnitudes and Arabic numerals has been put forward as a key factor in children's mathematical development. This mapping ability has been mainly examined indirectly by looking at children's performance on a symbolic magnitude comparison task. The present study investigated mapping in a more direct way by using a task in which children had to choose which of two choice quantities (Arabic digits or dot arrays) matched the target quantity (dot array or Arabic digit), thereby focusing on small quantities ranging from 1 to 9. We aimed to determine the development of mapping over time and its relation to mathematics achievement. Participants were 36 first graders (M = 6 years 8 months) and 46 third graders (M = 8 years 8 months) who all completed mapping tasks, symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude comparison tasks and standardized timed and untimed tests of mathematics achievement. Findings revealed that children are able to map between non-symbolic and symbolic representations and that this mapping ability develops over time. Moreover, we found that children's mapping ability is related to timed and untimed measures of mathematics achievement, over and above the variance accounted for by their numerical magnitude comparison skills.
    PLoS ONE 04/2014; 9(4):e93565. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093565 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "ension . The heritability estimates of performance on large - scale tests of reading and numeracy are moderate and consistent with the estimates obtained from studies conducted in the United Kingdom and the United States ( Harlaar , Dale , & Plomin , 2007 ; Harlaar , Hayiou - Thomas , & Plomin , 2005 ; Hart et al . , 2013 ; Oliver et al . , 2004 ; Petrill et al . , 2012 ) . The heritability estimates of the literacy skills are also in line with larger studies , with a lower estimate for vocabulary than for comprehension and word reading ( Harlaar et al . , 2010 ) . Moreover , the estimates of this subsample of Australian students who provided information on their large - scale test results were very cl"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Each year, all Australian students in grades 3, 5, 7 and 9 sit nationwide large-scale tests in literacy and numeracy which have their validity frequently questioned. We compared the performance of grade 3 twins on these large-scale reading tests with their performance on three individually administered literacy tests in comprehension, word reading and vocabulary within a genetically sensitive design. Comprehension, word reading and vocabulary accounted for a substantial amount of the variance in school reading tests. Performance on large-scale reading tests and individually administered tests was moderately to substantially heritable and the same genes contributed to performance in both types of test. These results confirm that large-scale school reading tests measure, at least in part, the literacy skills assessed by individual tests that are frequently considered to be the ‘gold-standard’ in testing. Also, as could be expected, the individually administered literacy tests were more closely related to performance on large-scale reading tests than to performance on large-scale school numeracy tests.
    Australian Journal of Education 03/2014; 59(1):5-21. DOI:10.1177/0004944114563775 · 0.47 Impact Factor
Show more