Article

The Relationship Between Somatic Symptoms, Health Anxiety, and Outcome in Medical Out-Patients

School of Community Based Medicine, The University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
The Psychiatric clinics of North America (Impact Factor: 1.87). 09/2011; 34(3):545-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.05.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The author and colleagues tested cut point scores on measures of total somatic symptoms and health anxiety of new medical out-patients, to determine whether they predicted health status and number of medical consultations. High-scoring participants had significantly more impaired health status and medical consultations. High scores were associated with dissatisfaction with the doctor's explanation of their symptoms. Whether symptoms were medically explained or not made little difference to these results; anxiety and depression were not found to have effect. The author and colleagues found support for the combination of somatic symptoms and health anxiety as proposed in DSM-V complex somatic symptom disorder.

0 Followers
 · 
76 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Somatic symptom burden and health anxiety demonstrate overlapping clinical characteristics but their relationship in the general population is unclear. This study examined the association between these dimensions after adjustment for confounders and their respective correlation with outcome measures.MethodsA randomly selected population-based sample of 3014 respondents aged 15–65 was interviewed by telephone using a structured questionnaire that included the 15-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), Whiteley-7, Kessler-6, Sheehan Disability Scale, socio-demographic variables and items regarding health care utilization. Respondents who scored 10 or above on PHQ-15 and 4 or above on Whiteley-5 were regarded as having high somatic symptom burden and high health anxiety respectively.ResultsSomatic symptom burden and health anxiety are moderately correlated after adjustment for confounders (p < .001). Both have important effects on psychological distress, functional impairment and health care utilization independent of each other (ps < .001). A considerable number of respondents (5.7%) reported both high somatic symptom burden and high health anxiety and this group showed the greatest general psychological distress, functional impairment and health care utilization.Conclusion This study demonstrates the close association of somatic symptom burden and health anxiety but also their independent association with psychological distress, functional impairment and health care utilization. The findings support the concept of the DSM-5 category of somatic symptom disorder, but also demonstrate that individuals with high somatic symptom burden or high health anxiety alone may merit separate diagnoses. More sophisticated studies of the relationship between somatic symptom burden and health anxiety are needed.
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 11/2014; 78(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.012 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The new DSM-5 Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) emphasizes the importance of psychological processes related to somatic symptoms in patients with somatoform disorders. To address this, the Somatic Symptoms Experiences Questionnaire (SSEQ), the first self-report scale that assesses a broad range of psychological and interactional characteristics relevant to patients with a somatoform disorder or SSD, was developed. This prospective study was conducted to validate the SSEQ. The 15-item SSEQ was administered along with a battery of self-report questionnaires to psychosomatic inpatients. Patients were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV to confirm a somatoform, depressive, or anxiety disorder. Confirmatory factor analyses, tests of internal consistency and tests of validity were performed. Patients (n=262) with a mean age of 43.4years, 60.3% women, were included in the analyses. The previously observed four-factor model was replicated and internal consistency was good (Cronbach's α=.90). Patients with a somatoform disorder had significantly higher scores on the SSEQ (t=4.24, p<.001) than patients with a depressive/anxiety disorder. Construct validity was shown by high correlations with other instruments measuring related constructs. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that the questionnaire predicted health-related quality of life. Sensitivity to change was shown by significantly higher effect sizes of the SSEQ change scores for improved patients than for patients without improvement. The SSEQ appears to be a reliable, valid, and efficient instrument to assess a broad range of psychological and interactional features related to the experience of somatic symptoms. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 03/2015; 78(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.004 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The DSM-5 revision of the health anxiety classification (i.e., hypochondriasis) highlights deficiencies in the present DSM taxonomy and the need to consider an alternative. Health anxiety is a clinical syndrome that has been and remains difficult to classify in the DSM system. We argue that the current DSM-5 proposal that splits this syndrome between two diagnoses, somatic symptom disorder (SSD) and illness anxiety disorder (IAD), has significant limitations. We anticipate that SSD will problematically increase comorbidity because criteria for this syndrome feature nonspecific symptoms that overlap with depressive and anxiety disorders. Further, the proposed IAD criteria are overly restrictive and not likely to capture the heterogeneous presentation of individuals with anxiety about their health. We propose an alternative organization that will increase the clinical utility and construct validity of many DSM-IV-TR, Axis I disorders, including health anxiety. This taxonomy, proposed by Goldberg, Krueger, Andrews and Hobbs, is based on the shared etiology of syndromes called emotional disorders. The emotional disorders include health anxiety, other somatoform, unipolar depressive, and anxiety disorders, all of which share the risk factor of negative emotionality/neuroticism (NE/N). We propose a research agenda to support this alternative taxonomy.
    Current Psychiatry Reviews 01/2014; 10(1). DOI:10.2174/1573400509666131119010129