The geriatric assessment

Methodist Charlton Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75237, USA.
American family physician (Impact Factor: 1.82). 01/2011; 83(1):48-56.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The geriatric assessment is a multidimensional, multidisciplinary assessment designed to evaluate an older person's functional ability, physical health, cognition and mental health, and socioenvironmental circumstances. It is usually initiated when the physician identifies a potential problem. Specific elements of physical health that are evaluated include nutrition, vision, hearing, fecal and urinary continence, and balance. The geriatric assessment aids in the diagnosis of medical conditions; development of treatment and follow-up plans; coordination of management of care; and evaluation of long-term care needs and optimal placement. The geriatric assessment differs from a standard medical evaluation by including nonmedical domains; by emphasizing functional capacity and quality of life; and, often, by incorporating a multidisciplinary team. It usually yields a more complete and relevant list of medical problems, functional problems, and psychosocial issues. Well-validated tools and survey instruments for evaluating activities of daily living, hearing, fecal and urinary continence, balance, and cognition are an important part of the geriatric assessment. Because of the demands of a busy clinical practice, most geriatric assessments tend to be less comprehensive and more problem-directed. When multiple concerns are presented, the use of a "rolling" assessment over several visits should be considered. Academy of Family Physicians.

1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Despite the evidence of age-related changes, olfactory evaluation is not a common practice in gerontological assessments (Elsawy and Higgins 2011) and the utility of selfreported olfactory function has been questioned. The prevalence of self-reported olfactory dysfunction shows age-related increases, yet is lower than the measured prevalence (Wysocki and Gilbert 1989; Hoffman et al. 1998). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 2011-14 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey chemosensory protocol asks adults to self-rate their orthonasal (via nostrils) and retronasal (via mouth) smell abilities for subsequent odor identification testing. From data collected with a similar protocol, we aimed to identify a self-reported olfactory index that showed the best sensitivity (correctly identifying dysfunction) and specificity (correctly indentifying normosmia) with measured olfaction. In home-based testing, 121 independent-living older women (age 73±7 years) reported their olfactory function by interviewer-administered survey. Olfactory function was measured orthonasally via composite (odor threshold, identification task) or identification task alone. Only 16 % of women self-rated "below average" smell function. More women perceived loss of smell (38 %) or flavor (30 %) with aging. The rate of measured dysfunction was 30 % by composite (threshold and identification) and 21.5 % by identification task, the latter misclassifying some mild dysfunction as normosmia. An index of self-rated smell function and perceived loss yielded the most favorable sensitivity (65 %) and specificity (77 %) to measured function. Self-rated olfaction showed better agreement with severe measured dysfunction; mild dysfunction was less noticed. Self-reported indices that query about current and perceived changes in smell and flavor with aging showed better sensitivity estimates than those previously reported. Specificity was somewhat lower-some older adults may correctly perceive loss unidentified in a single assessment, or have a retronasal impairment that was undetected by an orthonasal measure. Our findings should inform self-rated measures that screen for severe olfactory dysfunction in clinical/community settings where testing is not routine.
    Chemosensory Perception 12/2014; 7(3-4):108-116. DOI:10.1007/s12078-014-9170-7 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As the population continues to age, there will be a concomitant increase in the need for surgical intervention for a variety of disease processes for this group of patients. To date, surgical decision-making is overly subjective, and preoperative risk assessment tools are imprecise, lacking an ability to fully predict an elderly patient’s physiologic reserve to withstand the intended insult of surgery. Frailty is an emerging concept that incorporates multiple functional, cognitive, and physiologic measurements to better grasp a patient’s reserve. The preoperative measurement of frailty may offer an improved risk assessment tool to predict for adverse peri-operative outcomes, especially in the elderly population.
    06/2013; 2(2). DOI:10.1007/s13670-013-0038-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing evidence in managing polypharmacy in the growing elderly population with a higher prevalence of multiple chronic disease is the basis for this paper. Poor adherence, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and inappropriate medication challenge the prescriptions of health care providers in this group of patients. Risk factors, the prevalence of polypharmacy, and the impact on health issues will be shown by analyzing the recent literature. Based on intervention trials, several tools in polypharmacy have emerged as practical guides for clinical practice or for the geriatric ward to solve this problem. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and national lists of potentially inappropriate medication used in clinical practice are presented, including Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to the Right Treatment (START), Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), and Assess, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Adherence, Development, Emergence, Minimization, Interdisciplinarity, Alertness (ACADEMIA).
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 07/2012; 45(6):468-72. DOI:10.1007/s00391-012-0362-y · 1.02 Impact Factor
Show more