The Effect of Herbal Extract (EstroG-100) on Pre-, Peri- and Post-Menopausal Women: A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
Shady Canyon Medical Group, 16300 Sand Canyon, Suite 909, Irvine, CA 92618, USA. Phytotherapy Research
(Impact Factor: 2.66).
04/2012; 26(4):510-6. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.3597
This clinical research study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a new herbal product, EstroG-100, containing a mixture of standardized extracts of Cynanchum wilfordii, Phlomis umbrosa and Angelica gigas, on menopausal symptoms. This randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed for 12 weeks with 64 pre-, peri- and postmenopausal White Hispanic, White non-Hispanic and African American women who were randomly allocated to either the EstroG-100 group (n = 31) or the placebo group (n = 3). Primary end-points were the mean change in scores of the Kupperman menopause index (KMI) that evaluates 11 symptoms, and the mean change in scores of vaginal dryness. The mean KMI score was significantly reduced in the EstroG-100 group from 29.5 ± 7.4 at baseline to 11.3 ± 5.8 (p < 0.01) compared with change of the placebo group (29.2 ± 6.6 at baseline vs 23.7 ± 7.7 at week 12). The constituting symptoms of vasomotor, paresthesia, insomnia, nervousness, melancholia, vertigo, fatigue and rheumatic pain were significantly improved in the EstroG-100 group in comparison with the placebo group (p < 0.05). Statistically significant improvement in vaginal dryness in the EstroG-100 group was also observed compared with that of the placebo group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, EstroG-100 significantly improved the menopausal symptoms of pre-, peri- and post-menopausal women without weight gain or any serious side effects.
Figures in this publication
Available from: Lan Kluwe
- "± 5.33 16 weeks Jia-Wey Shiau-Yau San (JWSYS), powder, 4 g, tid/day No Premelle 1 # /day 郑 Zheng et al., 2009  CHM: 30 (0) TCM package: 35 (0) Placebo: 20 (0) CHM: 51.40 ± 2.57 TCM package: 51.17 ± 2.82 Placebo: 50.65 ± 2.32 4, 8, 12 weeks Gengnianle Granule, 10 g, bid/day Yes TCM package 韦 Wei and Luo, 2007  60 (0)/30 (0) 40–55 3 months Qianjinbayin 3 g bid/day No Premarin 0.625 mg/day + Medroxyprogesterone 6 mg/day (15th–28th day) Qu et al., 2009  21 (0)/26 (0) 48.7 ± 8.1/50.4 ± 9.3 12 weeks Gengnianle decoction 200 mL/day No Tibolone 2.5 mg/day Chang et al., 2012  31 (2)/33 (1) 53.2 ± 5.7/54.1 ± 5.9 6, 12 weeks EstroG-100, 1 # bid/day Yes No Kim et al., 2012  36 (5)/36 (4) 52.98 ± 3.04/55.01 ± 3.67 12 weeks Red ginseng capsule 1 g tid/day Yes No Hsu et al., 2011  25 (0)/25 (0) 51.92 ± 2.97/53.08 "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluates 23 (9 Chinese and 14 non-Chinese) randomized controlled trials for efficacy and side effects of Chinese herbal medicine on menopausal symptoms. Menopause was diagnosed according to western medicine criteria in all studies while seven Chinese studies and one non-Chinese study further stratified the participants using traditional Chinese medical diagnosis "Zheng differentiation." Efficacy was reported by all 9 Chinese and 9/14 non-Chinese papers. Side effects and adverse events were generally mild and infrequent. Only ten severe adverse events were reported, two with possible association with the therapy. CHM did not increase the endometrial thickness, a common side effect of hormone therapy. None of the studies investigated long-term side effects. Critical analysis revealed that (1) high-quality studies on efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine for menopausal syndrome are rare and have the drawback of lacking traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis (Zheng-differentiation). (2) Chinese herbal medicine may be effective for at least some menopausal symptoms while side effects are likely less than hormone therapy. (3) All these findings need to be confirmed in further well-designed comprehensive studies meeting the standard of evidence-based medicine and including Zheng-differentiation of traditional Chinese medicine.
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 01/2012; 2012:568106. DOI:10.1155/2012/568106 · 1.88 Impact Factor
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology: official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 01/2015; 114(3). DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2014.12.010 · 2.60 Impact Factor
Available from: PubMed Central
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The ethanol extract of Angelica gigas Nakai (AGN) root has promising anti-cancer and other bioactivities in rodent models. It is currently believed that the pyranocoumarin isomers decursin (D) and decursinol angelate (DA) contribute to these activities. We and others have documented that D and DA were rapidly converted to decursinol (DOH) in rodents. However, our in vitro metabolism studies suggested that D and DA might be metabolized differently in humans. To test this hypothesis and address a key question for human translatability of animal model studies of D and DA or AGN extract, we conducted a single oral dose human pharmacokinetic study of D and DA delivered through an AGN-based dietary supplement Cogni.Q (purchased from Quality of Life Labs, Purchase, NY) in twenty healthy subjects, i.e., 10 men and 10 women, each consuming 119 mg D and 77 mg DA from 4 vegicaps. Analyses of plasma samples using UHPLC-MS/MS showed mean time to peak concentration (Tmax) of 2.1, 2.4 and 3.3 h and mean peak concentration (Cmax) of 5.3, 48.1 and 2,480 nmol/L for D, DA and DOH, respectively. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) for D and DA was similar (17.4 and 19.3 h) and each was much longer than that of DOH (7.4 h). The mean area under the curve (AUC0-48h) for D, DA and DOH was estimated as 37, 335 and 27,579 h∙nmol/L, respectively. Gender-wise, men absorbed the parent compounds faster and took shorter time to reach DOH peak concentration. The human data supported an extensive conversion of D and DA to DOH, even though they metabolized DA slightly slower than rodents. Therefore, the data generated in rodent models concerning anti-cancer efficacy, safety, tissue distribution and pharmacodynamic biomarkers will likely be relevant for human translation.
PLoS ONE 02/2015; 10(2):e0114992. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0114992 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.