Article

Malignancies associated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in registries and prospective observational studies: a systemic reiew and meta-analysis

Hôpital Bicêtre, Institut Pour la Santé et Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U 1012, Université Paris-Sud 11, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Annals of the rheumatic diseases (Impact Factor: 10.38). 09/2011; 70(11):1895-904. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.149419
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This project was undertaken to assess the risk of malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in clinical practice, as recorded in prospective, observational studies.
The authors undertook comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and American College of Rheumatology, European League against Rheumatism and British Society for Rheumatology conference abstracts according to a prespecified protocol.
The searches identified 2039 full-text papers and 1979 conference abstracts, of which 21 full texts and eight abstracts met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate for the risk of all-site malignancy from seven studies was 0.95 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.05). Two studies reported there was no evidence that longer exposure to TNFi agents increased the risk of malignancy. In patients with previous malignancies there was a higher risk of a new/recurring malignancy. This risk was not increased further by exposure to TNFi, although CI were wide. Results from four studies showed that patients treated with TNFi have a significantly increased risk of developing a non-melanoma skin cancer (1.45, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.76). In addition, patients are at an increased risk of developing melanoma, as the pooled estimate from two studies was 1.79 (95% CI 0.92 to 2.67). The pooled estimate for the risk of lymphoma was 1.11 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.51).
This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that TNFi treatments do not increase the risk of malignancy, particularly lymphoma. However, they do appear to increase the risk of skin cancer, including melanoma.

1 Follower
 · 
138 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Ausgangspunkt der neuen S1-Leitlinie waren die 2010 erschienenen EULAR Recommendations zum Management der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA), die nach umfangreichen systematischen Literaturrecherchen (SLR) evidenzbasiert erstellt worden sind. Die SLR wurde für die deutschen Empfehlungen aktualisiert und wird in ihrer Methodik vorgestellt. Methodik Die SLR wurde für den Zeitraum von Januar 2009 bis Ende August 2011 durchgeführt. Es wurden alle kontrollierten Studien eingeschlossen, die die krankheitsmodifizierende Therapie der RA hinsichtlich ihrer Wirksamkeit auf Klinik, Funktion und Struktur untersucht haben. Ergebnisse Von 6869 gesichteten Arbeiten wurden 138 Artikel und 56 Abstracts für die Erstellung der Leitlinie berücksichtigt. Auf einem Konsensustreffen wurden die Ergebnisse der SLR vorgestellt. Auf dieser Grundlage formulierte das Expertengremium modifizierte Empfehlungen und verabschiedete diese mittels Konsensus. Schlussfolgerungen Mithilfe der aktualisierten SLR konnten wesentliche neue Daten im Entscheidungsprozess für die neue S1-Leitlinie zur medikamentösen Therapie der RA berücksichtigt werden.
    Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie 09/2012; 71(7). DOI:10.1007/s00393-012-1048-y · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • Gut 12/2011; 61(4):476-83. DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301133 · 13.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fusion proteins directed towards soluble targets make an important contribution to the treatment of disease. The purpose of this review was to correlate the clinical and preclinical data on the 14 currently approved mAbs and fusion proteins targeted to soluble targets. The principal sources used to gather data were: the peer reviewed Literature; European Medicines Agency 'Scientific Discussions' and United States Food and Drug Administration 'Pharmacology/Toxicology Reviews' and package inserts (United States Prescribing Information). Data on the following approved biopharmaceuticals were included: adalimumab, anakinra, bevacizumab, canakinumab, certolizumab pegol, denosumab, eculizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, omalizumab, ranibizumab, rilonacept and ustekinumab. Some related biopharmaceuticals in late-stage development were also included for comparison. Good concordance with human pharmacodynamics was found for both non-human primates (NHPs) receiving the human biopharmaceutical and mice receiving rodent homologues (surrogates). In contrast, there was limited concordance for human adverse effects in genetically deficient mice, mice receiving surrogates or NHPs receiving the human pharmaceutical. In summary, the results of this survey show that although both mice and NHPs have good predictive value for human pharmacodynamics, neither species have good predictive value for human adverse effects. No evidence that NHPs have superior predictive value was found.
    British Journal of Pharmacology 12/2011; 166(3):806-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01812.x · 4.99 Impact Factor
Show more