Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescents

Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3806, USA.
Developmental Science (Impact Factor: 3.89). 09/2011; 14(5):1119-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01061.x
Source: PubMed


Studies of brain development suggest that the increase in risk taking observed during adolescence may be due to insufficient prefrontal executive function compared to a more rapidly developing subcortical motivation system. We examined executive function as assessed by working memory ability in a community sample of youth (n = 387, ages 10 to 12 at baseline) in three annual assessments to determine its relation to two forms of impulsivity (sensation seeking and acting without thinking) and a wide range of risk and externalizing behavior. Using structural equation modeling, we tested a model in which differential activation of the dorsal and ventral striatum produces imbalance in the function of these brain regions. For youth high in sensation seeking, both regions were predicted to develop with age. However, for youth high in the tendency to act without thinking, the ventral striatum was expected to dominate. The model predicted that working memory ability would exhibit (1) early weakness in youth high in acting without thinking but (2) growing strength in those high in sensation seeking. In addition, it predicted that (3) acting without thinking would be more strongly related to risk and externalizing behavior than sensation seeking. Finally, it predicted that (4) controlling for acting without thinking, sensation seeking would predict later increases in risky and externalizing behavior. All four of these predictions were confirmed. The results indicate that the rise in sensation seeking that occurs during adolescence is not accompanied by a deficit in executive function and therefore requires different intervention strategies from those for youth whose impulsivity is characterized by early signs of acting without thinking.

Download full-text


Available from: Laura Betancourt,
  • Source
    • "Physical and mental health is affected by a complex interplay of individual and social factors at personal , family , community , and national levels ( Viner et al . , 2012 ), as well as by individual differences in cognitive abilities ( e . g . , Romer et al . , 2011 ) , attachment history ( Bowlby , 1988 ) , and personality traits . As we are discussing throughout this paper , all these factors undergo dramatic modifications during adolescence that tend to slow down and stabilize as the individual becomes an adult—better yet , that adultness begins when these factors begin to slow down and stabiliz"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are several reasons why adolescence is interesting. It is in this phase that an individual finds herself fully facing the external world: basically equipped with the kind of social cognition that s/he has acquired at home, at school and through the media during childhood, s/he has now to meet a host of other, diverse views of what " reasonable, " " appropriate, " or " expected " courses of thought and emotions are, in the wild with friends and peers, romantic or sexual partners, teachers and employers, and the society at large. Furthermore, she is also expected, both at home and in the external world, to have a wholly new degree of control over such courses. While the idea that the development of social cognition still progresses after infancy (and possibly throughout the life span) is clearly gaining consensus in the field, the literature building on it is still scarce. One of the reasons for this probably is that most tests used to study it focus on its basic component, namely theory of mind, and have been mostly devised for us with children; therefore, they are not suitable to deal with the hugely increasing complexity of social and mental life during adolescence and adulthood. Starting from a review of the literature available, we will argue that the development of social cognition should be viewed as a largely yet-to-be-understood mix of biological and cultural factors. While it is widely agreed upon that the very initial manifestations of social life in the newborn are largely driven by an innate engine with which all humans are equally endowed, it is also evident that each culture, and each individual within it, develops specific adult versions of social cognition.
    Frontiers in Psychology 09/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01011 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Teenage is a significant period of brain development and behavioural maturation during which the corresponding changes in neuroplasticity places the adolescent brain at a particular risk to environmental factors such as drug exposure; using cannabis in this period increases the future risk of using other illicit drugs later in life, a phenomenon known as the gateway hypothesis [22]. However, it is also worth noting that a general increase in exploratory and social behaviours is also characteristic of this ontogenetic period [26] [27] [29], and not all individuals will be lead to abuse or to the intake of other addictive substances. And, although there are other factors that might lead to early cannabis use, such as cultural or familiar background, it is suggested that there is a genetical vulnerability [2] [22] [1] [9] with reward-system based personality traits being their most powerful predictors [20] [24] [8] [17] [5] [13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies analysing personality and cannabis use in adult samples suggest that cannabis users show significant higher levels of impulsivity, sensation seeking and schizotypy. However, there are few studies exploring this relationship in adolescence using psychobiological models of personality. Given the relevance of identifying individual differences that lead adolescents to early cannabis use to prevent future health problems, the present study aimed to explore the relationship between age, sex, personality and early cannabis use using a psychobiological model of personality in a sample of 415 students (51.8% boys) from 12 to 18 years. Chi(2) tests showed significant higher prevalence of cannabis use in boys and in the group aged 15-18 years. Multiple analysis of variance showed significant higher scores in psychoticism, sensation seeking and in all its subscales in cannabis users group, while an interaction with age was found for extraversion and neuroticism: cannabis users scored higher than non-users in the youngest group (12-14 years) but lower in the oldest group in both dimensions. Finally, regression analysis showed that narrower traits of sensation seeking (experience seeking and disinhibition) were the most associated to early cannabis use. Results are discussed in terms of early cannabis users' personality profiles and in terms of the self-medication theory. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
    European Psychiatry 03/2015; 30(4). DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.02.008 · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Adolescence represents a critical period for brain development. Age-related changes include alterations in sensitivity to salient stimuli, addressed by neurodevelopmental models to enhanced frontal, subcortical-limbic, and striatal activation, a pattern associated with the rise of impulsivity (IMP) and deficits in inhibitory control (IC; Romer et al., 2009), marking the risk for psychopathology and maladaptive behaviors. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Adolescence represents a critical period for brain development, addressed by neurodevelopmental models to frontal, subcortical-limbic, and striatal activation, a pattern associated with rise of impulsivity and deficits in inhibitory control. The present study aimed at studying the association between self-report measures of impulsivity and inhibitory control with executive function in adolescents, employing structural equation modeling. Method. Tests were administered to 434 high school students. Acting without thinking was measured through the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale and the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory, reward sensitivity through the Behavioral Activation System, and sensation seeking through the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personali- ty Questionnaire. Inhibitory control was assessed through the Behavioral Inhibition System. The performance at the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task indicated executive function. Three models were specified using Sample Covariance Matrix, and the estimated parameters using Maximum Likelihood. Results. In the final model, impulsivity and inhibitory control predicted executive function, but sensation seeking did not. The fit of the model to data was excellent. Conclusions. The hypothesis that inhibitory control and impulsivity are predictors of executive function was supported. Our results appear informative of the validity of self-report measures to examine the relation between impulsivity traits rather than others to regulatory function of cognition and behavior.
    Advances in Cognitive Psychology 05/2014; 10(2):32-8. DOI:10.5709/acp-0154-5 · 1.65 Impact Factor
Show more