Article

Survival of patients with small cell carcinoma of the prostate during 1973-2003: a population-based study

Divisions of Urology Biostatistics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
BJU International (Impact Factor: 3.13). 08/2011; 109(6):824-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10523.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the survival of patients with primary small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate and assess prognostic factors based on a large population sample.
A total of 241 cases of SCC of the prostate were reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 1973 to 2003 of which 191 cases were included in our study. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for estimating survival, and Cox proportional hazard regression modelling to evaluate prognostic variables.
The overall age-adjusted incidence rate was 0.278 per 1,000,000 (95% confidence interval, 0.239-0.323). In all, 60.5% presented as metastatic disease compared with 39.5% who presented as local/regional disease (P= 0.012). The 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months observed survival rates were 47.9%, 27.5%, 19%, 17% and 14.3% respectively. On univariate analyses, age <60, concomitant low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, absence of metastasis, prostatectomy and radiation therapy were favourable prognostic factors. In multivariate regression modelling, age, pathology and stage were strong predictors of survival.
Using the SEER database, we present the largest study describing the epidemiology of primary SCC of the prostate. We found age, concomitant low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, and stage of the disease to be the strongest predictors of survival for patients with prostatic SCC. Future studies evaluating a broader range of clinical and molecular markers are needed to refine the prognostic model of this relatively rare disease.

0 Followers
 · 
118 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) marks a structural and functional feature of certain cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa), whereby the malignant tissue contains a significant proportion of cells displaying neuronal, endocrine, or mixed features. NED cells produce, and can secrete, a cocktail of mediators commonly encountered in the nervous system, which may stimulate and coordinate cancer growth. In PCa, NED appears during advanced stages, subsequent to treatment, and accompanies treatment resistance and poor prognosis. However, the term " neuroendocrine " in this context is intrinsically vague. This article seeks to provide a framework on which a unified view of NED might emerge. First, we review the mutually beneficial interplay between PCa and neural structures, mainly supported by cell biology experiments and neurological conditions. Next, we address the correlations between PCa and neural functions, as described in the literature. Based upon the integration of clinical and basic observations, we suggest that it is legitimate to seek for true neural differentiation, or neuromimicry, in cancer progression, most notably in PCa cells exhibiting what is commonly described as NED.
    Frontiers in Oncology 03/2015; 5(37). DOI:10.3389/fonc.2015.00037
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Small-cell carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive cancer whose rarity has prevented the development of a consensus management approach. The objective of the current study was to determine the treatment patterns and evaluate factors affecting overall survival for patients with localized small-cell carcinoma of the prostate.Methods:After querying the National Cancer Database, we identified all patients diagnosed with localized small-cell carcinoma of the prostate between 1998 and 2011 (n=287). Using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses, we assessed the effect of treatment and clinical stage on overall survival.Results:Treatments included radiation therapy in 46% (n=131), chemotherapy in 38% (n=107), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 22% (n=63) and radical prostatectomy in 13% (n=38). Median overall survival was 14.8 months. Upon multivariate analysis, local therapy (radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy) was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.38, P<0.001). Advanced clinical stage predicted worse survival among all men (cT3: HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.27-6.32, P=0.011; cT4: HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.50-7.07, P=0.003) and men who received local therapy (cT3: HR 4.67, 95% CI 1.41-15.44, P=0.012; cT4: HR 4.01, 95% CI 1.14-14.08, P=0.03) but not among men who received no local therapy (cT3: HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.51-5.27, P=0.4; cT4: HR 2.35, 95% CI 0.74-7.48, P=0.15). Age, receipt of chemotherapy and ADT, and clinical stage T2 disease (compared with T1) did not predict survival.Conclusion:Men with localized small-cell carcinoma of the prostate have a poor overall survival. Local therapy may represent a suitable and underused modality for select patients.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease advance online publication, 15 July 2014; doi:10.1038/pcan.2014.26.
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 07/2014; DOI:10.1038/pcan.2014.26 · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is an aggressive variant of prostate cancer that commonly arises in later stages of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) The detection of NEPC has clinical implications as these patients are often treated with platinum chemotherapy rather than with androgen receptor targeted therapies. The poor molecular characterization of NEPC accounts in part for the lack of disease specific therapeutics. Several mechanisms are involved in NE differentiation, including inflammation and autophagy, and may actually represent future therapeutic targets for advanced NEPC patients. Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests a potential role of circulating tumor cells in the early diagnosis and treatment of NEPC. Here we summarize the recent findings on NEPC pathogenesis and we discuss the ongoing clinical trials and future perspectives for the treatment of NEPC patients. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer 11/2014; 1846(2):630-637. DOI:10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.10.008 · 7.58 Impact Factor