Article

Contact Toxicity, Feeding Reduction, and Repellency of Essential Oils From Three Plants From the Ginger Family (Zingiberaceae) and Their Major Components Against Sitophilus zeamais and Tribolium castaneum

Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Rd., Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2M9, Canada.
Journal of Economic Entomology (Impact Factor: 1.61). 08/2011; 104(4):1445-54. DOI: 10.1603/EC11050
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The essential oils from rhizomes of Alpinia conchigera Griff, Zingiber zerumbet Smitt, Curcuma zedoaria (Berg.) Roscoe; their major compounds (camphene, camphor, 1,8-cineole, alpha-humulene, isoborneol, alpha-pinene, beta-pinene and terpinen-4-ol); and synthetic essential oils comprised of mixtures of major pure compounds in the same ratios as the extracted essential oils were tested for contact, feeding reduction, and repellency against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) adults. Via topical applications, the three extracted oils had similar toxicity against S. zeamais (LD50 fiducial limits: 18-24 microg oil/mg insect). T. castaneum had similar sensitivity to all three oils (35-58 microg/mg), and it was less sensitive than S. zeamais. The LD50 values of synthetic A. conchigera and synthetic Z. zerumbet oils were similar to those of their corresponding extracted essential oils. The synthetic C. zedoaria oils showed lower contact toxicity than the extracted C. zedoaria oils to both insects. Sitophilus zeamais and T. castaneum were sensitive to terpinen-4-ol and isoborneol in contact toxicity tests. In antifeedant tests, the three extracted oils were able to decrease the consumption of flour disks, especially Z. zerumbet oils, whereas both insect species could feed on the flour disks treated with three synthetic essential oils. Only terpinen-4-ol deterred feeding in both insects. In repellency tests, A. conchigera oils at highest concentration repelled S. zeamais and T. castaneum. None of the synthetic essential oils repelled S. zeamais (315 microl/cm2) and T. castaneum (31 microl/cm2) Only terpinen-4-ol showed repellent activity against both insects.

4 Followers
 · 
261 Views
  • Source
    African journal of agricultural research 01/2013; 8(11):978-983.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review summarises information on compounds of plant origin and plant products as feeding inhibitors for stored product insects. More than 200 compounds (mostly sesquiterpenes) and over 160 plant extracts have been tested to date. Indeed, we did not consider substances stimulating olfactory receptors (repellents) or compounds just toxic to insects. The main scope of the review is to enable best choice for the most active, as well as biorationally suitable substances, for evolving further rational experiments in future. Feeding inhibitors may be used along with food or sex attractants in biorational control of the stored food pests. However, each semiochem-ical should be submitted to a formal registration process before its use in practice.
    Phytochemistry Reviews 12/2012; 11(4):543-566. DOI:10.1007/s11101-013-9273-9
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this research was to evaluate the fumigant activity of essential oils obtained from aerial parts of three Lamiaceae plants [Mentha longifolia L. subsp. typhoides (Brig.) Harley, Dorystoechas hastata Boiss. & Heldr. ex Bentham (endemic), and Origanum minutiflorum O. Schwarz et. H. Davis (endemic)] which naturally grow in Antalya region on 10-15 days old (2nd or 3rd instar) nymphs of German cockroach (Blattella germanica L.) at different concentrations ranging from 25 to 500 µl/L. GC- MS analysis revealed the presence of 1,8-cineole (25.9%), borneol (18.98%) and camphor (16.93%) in D. hastata, car-vacrol (97.93%) in O. minutiflorum, as well as cis-piperitone epoxide (53.25%) and piperitenone oxide (31.46%) in M. longifolia subsp. typhoides. When all essential oils were compared on the basis of fumigant toxicity, D. hastata essential oil is a more statistically significant fumigant than the other two essential oils at 100, 200 and 300 µl/L levels. There is no significant difference found at these concentrations between M. longifolia and O. minutiflorum essential oils. Moreover, at application levels of 400 and 500 µl/L, the most toxic essential oil was also from D. hastata, followed by those of M. longifolia and O. minutiflorum, respectively.
    Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 06/2012; 21(6):1571-1577.

Preview

Download
19 Downloads
Available from