Article

Response to regulatory stringency: the case of antipsychotic medication use in nursing homes.

Department of Economics and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Health Economics (Impact Factor: 2.14). 09/2011; 21(8):977-93. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1775
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper studies the impact of regulatory stringency, as measured by the statewide deficiency citation rate over the past year, on the quality of care provided in a national sample of nursing homes from 2000 to 2005. The quality measure used is the proportion of residents who are using antipsychotic medication. Although the changing case-mix of nursing home residents accounts for some of the increase in the use of antipsychotics, we find that the use of antipsychotics by nursing homes is responsive to state regulatory enforcement in a manner consistent with the multitasking incentive problem. Specifically, the effect of the regulations is dependent on the degree of complementarity between the regulatory deficiency and the use of antipsychotics.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
166 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To assess whether reductions in physical restraint use associated with quality reporting may have had the unintended consequence of increasing antipsychotic use in nursing home (NH) residents with severe cognitive impairment. DesignRetrospective analysis of NH clinical assessment data from 1999 to 2008 comparing NHs subject to public reporting of physical restraints with nonreporting NHs. SettingMedicare- and Medicaid-certified NHs in the United States. ParticipantsObservations (N = 3.9 million) on 809,645 residents with severe cognitive impairment in 4,258 NHs in six states. InterventionPublic reporting of physical restraint use rates. MeasurementsUse of physical restraints and antipsychotic medications. ResultsPhysical restraint use declined significantly from 1999 to 2008 in NH residents with severe cognitive impairment. The decline was larger in NHs that were subject to reporting of restraints than in those that were not (–8.3 vs –3.3 percentage points, P < .001). Correspondingly, antipsychotic use in the same residents increased more in NHs that were subject to public reporting (4.5 vs 2.9 percentage points, P < .001). Approximately 36% of the increase in antipsychotic use may be attributable to public reporting of physical restraints. Conclusion This analysis suggests that public reporting of physical restraint use had the unintended consequence of increasing use of antipsychotics in NH residents with severe cognitive impairment.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 03/2014; DOI:10.1111/jgs.12711 · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper by Kleijer and colleagues (2014) in this issue of International Psychogeriatrics describes factors that may influence antipsychotic drug (APD) prescribing rates in nursing homes in several countries. The authors conclude that the large variability is only partly explained by differences in resident characteristics, and that it is associated with certain facility characteristics such as bed size and urban/rural location. They also identify the likelihood that differences in physician prescribing patterns or facility prescribing culture may influence APD prescribing rates, as has been found in previous studies (Briesacher et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2010).
    International Psychogeriatrics 03/2014; 26(3):361-2. DOI:10.1017/S1041610213002597 · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of the Study: To examine how Medicaid capital reimbursement policy is associated with nursing homes (NHs) having high proportions of private rooms and small households. Through a 2009/2010 NH national survey, we identified NHs having small households and high proportions of private rooms (≥76%). A survey of state Medicaid officials and policy document review provided 2009 policy data. Facility- and county-level covariates were from Online Survey, Certification and Reporting, the Area Resource File, and aggregated resident assessment data (minimum data set). The policy of interest was the presence of traditional versus fair rental capital reimbursement policy. Average Medicaid per diem rates and the presence of NH pay-for-performance (p4p) reimbursement were also examined. A total of 1,665 NHs in 40 states were included. Multivariate logistic regression analyses (with clustering on states) were used. In multivariate models, Medicaid capital reimbursement policy was not significantly associated with either outcome. However, there was a significantly greater likelihood of NHs having many private rooms when states had higher Medicaid rates (per $10 increment; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.13; 95% CI 1.049, 1.228), and in states with versus without p4p (AOR 1.78; 95% CI 1.045, 3.036). Also, in states with p4p NHs had a greater likelihood of having small households (AOR 1.78; 95% CI 1.045, 3.0636). Higher NH Medicaid rates and reimbursement incentives may contribute to a higher presence of 2 important environmental artifacts of culture change-an abundance of private rooms and small households. However, longitudinal research examining policy change is needed to establish the cause and effect of the associations observed.
    The Gerontologist 02/2014; 54(Suppl_1):S76-S86. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnt141 · 2.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
44 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014