Article

The effect of smoking cessation counselling in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Impact Factor: 3.86). 08/2011; 118(12):1422-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03065.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pregnant smokers are often prescribed counselling as part of multicomponent cessation interventions. However, the isolated effect of counselling in this population remains unclear, and individual randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are inconclusive.
To conduct a meta-analysis of RCTs examining counselling in pregnant smokers.
We searched the CDC Tobacco Information and Prevention, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO databases for RCTs evaluating smoking cessation counselling.
We included RCTs conducted in pregnant women in which the effect of counselling could be isolated and those that reported biochemically validated abstinence at 6 or 12 months after the target quit date.
Overall estimates were derived using random effects meta-analysis models.
Our search identified eight RCTs (n = 3290 women), all of which examined abstinence at 6 months. The proportion of women that remained abstinent at the end of follow up was modest, ranging from 4 to 24% among those randomised to counselling and from 2 to 21% among control women. The absolute difference in abstinence reached a maximum of only 4%. Summary estimates are inconclusive because of wide confidence intervals, albeit with little evidence to suggest that counselling is efficacious at promoting abstinence (odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.40). There was no evidence to suggest that efficacy differed by counselling type.
Available data from RCTs examining the isolated effect of smoking cessation counselling in pregnant women are limited but sufficient to rule out large treatment effects. Future RCTs should examine pharmacological therapies in this population.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michèle Tremblay, Jun 27, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
113 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews the diagnosis and management of the most common respiratory conditions complicating pregnancy--asthma and influenza. We also review strategies for smoking cessation in pregnancy as, in addition to exacerbating all other pulmonary conditions, smoking is the most modifiable risk factor for poor pregnancy outcome. Moreover, the obstetrician frequently encounters each of these conditions in the ambulatory setting. A thorough knowledge of the normal pregnancy-induced physiological respiratory changes combined with a comprehensive understanding of how to manage these conditions, will provide the obstetrician with the armamentarium needed to optimize health outcomes for mothers and their fetuses.
    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 09/2012; 55(3):798-809. DOI:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31825cfd17 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Every year, 1·1 million babies die from prematurity, and many survivors are disabled. Worldwide, 15 million babies are born preterm (<37 weeks' gestation), with two decades of increasing rates in almost all countries with reliable data. The understanding of drivers and potential benefit of preventive interventions for preterm births is poor. We examined trends and estimate the potential reduction in preterm births for countries with very high human development index (VHHDI) if present evidence-based interventions were widely implemented. This analysis is to inform a rate reduction target for Born Too Soon. METHODS: Countries were assessed for inclusion based on availability and quality of preterm prevalence data (2000-10), and trend analyses with projections undertaken. We analysed drivers of rate increases in the USA, 1989-2004. For 39 countries with VHHDI with more than 10 000 births, we did country-by-country analyses based on target population, incremental coverage increase, and intervention efficacy. We estimated cost savings on the basis of reported costs for preterm care in the USA adjusted using World Bank purchasing power parity. FINDINGS: From 2010, even if all countries with VHHDI achieved annual preterm birth rate reductions of the best performers for 1990-2010 (Estonia and Croatia), 2000-10 (Sweden and Netherlands), or 2005-10 (Lithuania, Estonia), rates would experience a relative reduction of less than 5% by 2015 on average across the 39 countries. Our analysis of preterm birth rise 1989-2004 in USA suggests half the change is unexplained, but important drivers include non-medically indicated labour induction and caesarean delivery and assisted reproductive technologies. For all 39 countries with VHHDI, five interventions modelling at high coverage predicted a 5% relative reduction of preterm birth rate from 9·59% to 9·07% of livebirths: smoking cessation (0·01 rate reduction), decreasing multiple embryo transfers during assisted reproductive technologies (0·06), cervical cerclage (0·15), progesterone supplementation (0·01), and reduction of non-medically indicated labour induction or caesarean delivery (0·29). These findings translate to roughly 58 000 preterm births averted and total annual economic cost savings of about US$3 billion. INTERPRETATION: We recommend a conservative target of a relative reduction in preterm birth rates of 5% by 2015. Our findings highlight the urgent need for research into underlying mechanisms of preterm births, and development of innovative interventions. Furthermore, the highest preterm birth rates occur in low-income settings where the causes of prematurity might differ and have simpler solutions such as birth spacing and treatment of infections in pregnancy than in high-income countries. Urgent focus on these settings is also crucial to reduce preterm births worldwide. FUNDING: March of Dimes, USA, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and National Institutes of Health, USA.
    The Lancet 11/2012; 381(9862). DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X · 45.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: In all, 10% to 20% of all pregnant women smoke despite intentions to quit. Smoking cessation drugs such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion are recommended for pregnant women. Our observation that developmental exposure to nicotine adversely affects metabolic and reproductive outcomes in rats has raised concerns about NRT's safety during pregnancy. Conversely, the effect of bupropion has not been reported.Objective: The goal of this study was to examine the effect of fetal and neonatal exposure to bupropion on postnatal metabolic and reproductive outcomes.Methods: Dams (N = 5/group) were exposed to saline or bupropion (5 or 10 mg/kg per d) for 2 weeks prior to mating until weaning. We assessed weight, adiposity, and glucose homeostasis in all offspring until 26 weeks of age. Onset of puberty, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes in the female offspring were also assessed.Results: Fetal and neonatal exposure to bupropion did not cause metabolic derangement in the offspring despite a significant decrease in birth weight in the offspring of dams treated with 10/mg/kg per d bupropion (5.9 ± 0.2 g vs control 6.7 ± 0.2 g; P = .02). Moreover, with the exception of accelerated pubertal onset in F1 and F2 offspring, bupropion administration to pregnant dams had no impact on fertility or pregnancy outcomes for either the dam or the female offspring.Conclusion: Fetal and neonatal exposure to the smoking cessation drug bupropion, unlike NRT, does not appear to adversely affect metabolic outcomes or the fertility of the female offspring. However, bupropion does appear to alter pubertal onset through an as yet unknown mechanism.
    Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) 02/2013; 20(10). DOI:10.1177/1933719113477493 · 2.18 Impact Factor