Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinomas; Analysis of a Large Database

Department of Pathology.
Clinical Medicine: Pathology 03/2008; 1:43-7.
Source: PubMed


Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (combined tumor) has been described as either a variant of hepatoma or a variant of cholangiocarcinoma. Prior studies evaluated fewer than 50 patients with combined tumors, precluding multivariate analyses. Posited was the notion that analysis of a large database would yield more definite answers.
This study used SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute) to analyze 282 combined tumors, 2,035 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and 19,336 hepatomas between the years 1973-2003. Multinomial logit regression calculated point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) for relative risk (rr). Cox regression calculated point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) for hazard ratios (ĥ).
Men less often had cholangiocarcinomas than they had combined tumors (rr = 0.63, c.i. = 0.49-0.81). Hepatomas less often than combined tumors presented with distant spread (rr = 0.56, c.i. = 0.43-0.72). Men (rr = 1.50, c.i. = 1.17-1.93) and patients with a known Asian or Pacific birthplace (rr = 2.36, c.i. = 1.56-3.56) more often had hepatomas than they had combined tumors. Among patients not known to have an Asian/Pacific birthplace, a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (ĥ = 0.72, c.i. = 0.63-0.82) or hepatoma (ĥ = 0.75, c.i. = 0.66-0.86) provided a better prognosis than did a diagnosis of combined tumor.
Combined tumors differ from hepatomas and cholangiocarcinomas in terms of distribution and survival patterns in the population; they should be considered neither cholangiocarcinomas nor hepatomas.

4 Reads
  • Source

    World Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2012; 18(34):4751. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i34.4751 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer comprising histopathological features of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Because of its rarity and controversial diagnostic criteria, it continues to be poorly understood with a lack of well-delineated treatment options for recurrent or metastatic disease. We report a case of cHCC-CC in a 31-year-old woman with no risk factors for HCC or CC with recurrent pulmonary metastasis treated with systemic chemotherapy.
    Gastrointestinal cancer research: GCR 11/2012; 5(6):199-202.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objectives: Although transplantation has demonstrated survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is limited data to support or refute transplantation for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC). We hypothesized that cHCC-CC patients had poorer overall survival (OS) than HCC patients after liver transplantation. Methods: Patients with localized HCC and cHCC-CC treated with surgical resection or transplant were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database (1973-2007). Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine survival. Results: We identified 3,378 (1,447 [43%] transplant, 1,931 [57%] resection) patients with HCC, and 54 (19 [35%] transplant, 35 [65%] resection) patients with cHCC-CC. Patients undergoing resection of HCC and cHCC-CC had similar 3-year OS (55% vs. 46%, P = 0.4). Three-year OS of patients undergoing transplant was significantly greater for HCC (78%) than for cHCC-CC (48%, P = 0.01). In adjusted models, patients transplanted for cHCC-CC had higher hazard of death compared to HCC patients (HR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.1, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Transplantation for localized cHCC-CC confers a survival benefit similar to liver resection for cHCC-CC, but inferior to transplantation for HCC. With survival data that mimics historic reports of transplant for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, this study questions the benefit of transplantation for patients with cHCC-CC.
    Journal of Surgical Oncology 05/2013; 107(6). DOI:10.1002/jso.23289 · 3.24 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications


4 Reads
Available from