Sexual Well-Being Among Survivors of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Oncology Nursing Forum (Impact Factor: 2.79). 09/2011; 38(5):E351-9. DOI: 10.1188/11.ONF.E351-E359
Source: PubMed


To describe sexual well-being among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors.
Descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional study.
NHL survivors identified via the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program.
222 NHL survivors two- to five-years postdiagnosis.
Data were collected via mailed questionnaire. Multivariate models were used to examine sexual well-being.
Three indices of sexual well-being were examined in relation to sociodemographic and medical variables: participation in sexual activity, satisfaction with sex life, and sexual function.
Most NHL survivors were participating in sexual activity; however, more than half were dissatisfied with their sex life. A substantial minority "usually or always" experienced problems with sexual function. Associations between study variables and outcomes differed across indices of sexual well-being and by gender; older age was associated with decreased participation, decreased satisfaction, and impaired sexual function for men as well as with decreased participation for women. Poorer physical functioning was associated with decreased participation for men and women as well as poorer sexual function for women. Finally, poorer mental functioning was associated with less satisfaction and poorer sexual function for men and women; shorter times since diagnosis were associated with poorer sexual function for women.
Most NHL survivors were sexually active, but many reported difficulties with satisfaction and function. Sexual well-being is a multifaceted construct that requires continued attention throughout survivorship.
Oncology nurses are in an excellent position to ensure that survivors' sexual concerns are addressed. Survivorship care plans may help to facilitate communication about survivors' sexual well-being.

6 Reads
  • Source
    • "Such research has focused almost exclusively on either men or women, and on cancers that directly affect reproductive or sexual sites of the body (for an exception see Hordern & Street 2007a), including breast (Ussher et al. 2013a), gynaecological (Stead et al. 2003), prostate and testicular cancers (Danile & Haddow 2011; Jankowska 2012). However, there is increasing evidence that both men and women across a range of cancer types report changes to their sexuality post cancer (Perz et al. 2014), including lung (Lindau et al. 2011), lymphatic (Jonker-Pool et al. 2004; Jarden et al. 2012), colon (van der Horst-Schrivers et al. 2009), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Beckjord et al. 2011), head and neck (Low et al. 2009), and colorectal cancer (Beck 2009). Despite this, health professionals have been reported to be less likely to discuss sexual changes with individuals or couples experiencing a non-sexual cancer (Ussher et al. 2013c). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changes to sexuality can be one of the most difficult aspects of life following cancer. This study examines the experience of discussing sexuality post cancer with health care professionals (HCPs), from the perspective of women and men with cancer (PWC), and their partners (PPWC), across a range of cancer types. A total of 657 PWC (535 women, 122 men) and 148 PPWC (87 women, 61 men) completed a survey containing closed and open-ended items, analysed by analysis of variance and thematic analysis. Discussions about sexuality with a HCP were more likely to be reported by men (68%) compared to women PWC (43%), and by women (47%) compared to men PPWC (28%), as well as by those with a sexual or reproductive cancer. Men PWC and women PPWC were most likely to want to discuss sexuality with a HCP, with men PWC and PPWC reporting highest levels of satisfaction with such discussions. Open-ended responses revealed dissatisfaction with the unwillingness of HCPs to discuss sexuality, unhappiness with the nature of such discussion, and positive accounts of discussions about sexuality with HCPs. These findings lend support to the notion that people with cancer and their partners may have unmet sexual information and support needs.
    European Journal of Cancer Care 08/2014; 2. DOI:10.1111/ecc.12216 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose/Objectives: To present findings on the impact of diagnosis and treatment on sexuality for those diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy. Research Approach: A qualitative design based on a series of open-ended interviews and one focus group. Setting: Queensland, Australia. Participants: 50 participants representing the major hematologic diagnostic groups. Methodologic Approach: Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and then coded and thematically analyzed for the research. Findings: The impact of the disease and treatment on sexuality ranged from participants experiencing no problems or having a brief impact that passes over time, to those who reported serious problems that significantly affected their life satisfaction. Some concerns were raised about the taboo nature of sexuality and the lack of discussion on the topic. Conclusions: The findings contradict prior research that all patients with cancer will experience an impact on their sexuality by diagnosis and treatment. The current study indicates that a small subgroup of individuals diagnosed with hematologic malignancies are acutely distressed about issues regarding sexuality and require follow-up. Interpretation: Individuals diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy may have difficulties with their sexuality and will, therefore, require follow-up or assistance. A subset of individuals will require understanding, support, and, for some, referral to follow-up with a specialist. As major obstacles still exist for patients accessing appropriate professional support and advice on sexuality, oncology nursing can provide leadership in this area.
    Oncology Nursing Forum 11/2012; 39(6):595-600. DOI:10.1188/12.ONF.595-600 · 2.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors' willingness to discuss health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) problems with their follow-up care physician. Willingness to discuss HRQOL problems (physical, daily, emotional, social, and sexual functioning) was examined among 374 NHL survivors, 2 to 5 years postdiagnosis. Survivors were asked if they would bring up HRQOL problems with their physician and indicate reasons why not. Logistic regression models examined the association of patient sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, follow-up care variables, and current HRQOL scores with willingness to discuss HRQOL problems. Overall, 94%, 82%, 76%, 43%, and 49% of survivors would initiate discussions of physical, daily, emotional, social, and sexual functioning, respectively. Survivors who indicated their physician "always" spent enough time with them or rated their care as "excellent" were more willing to discuss HRQOL problems (P < .05). Survivors reporting poorer physical health were less willing to discuss their daily functioning problems (P < .001). Men were more willing to discuss sexual problems than women (P < .001). One in three survivors cited "nothing can be done" as a reason for not discussing daily functioning problems, and at least one in four cited "this was not their doctor's job" and a preference to "talk to another clinician" as reasons for not discussing emotional, social, and sexual functioning. NHL survivors' willingness to raise HRQOL problems with their physician varied by HRQOL domain. For some domains, even when survivors were experiencing problems, they may not discuss them. To deliver cancer care for the whole patient, interventions that facilitate survivor-clinician communication about survivors' HRQOL are needed.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 09/2013; 31(31). DOI:10.1200/JCO.2012.47.6705 · 18.43 Impact Factor
Show more


6 Reads
Available from